Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 11, 2026. It is now read-only.

feat: support apiEndpoint override - #501

Merged
JustinBeckwith merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
apiendpoint
Jun 3, 2019
Merged

JustinBeckwith merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
apiendpoint

Conversation

@JustinBeckwith

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith commented May 31, 2019 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is going to pass the property onto the underlying gapic generated layer, so no real work is needed :)

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label May 31, 2019
@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 31, 2019 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #501 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #501   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.21%   97.21%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         431      431           
  Branches       55       55           
=======================================
  Hits          419      419           
  Partials       12       12
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.ts 95.43% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a99351e...fe5a8b6. Read the comment docs.

Comment thread package.json
"devDependencies": {
"@google-cloud/bigquery": "^4.0.0",
"@google-cloud/nodejs-repo-tools": "^3.0.0",
"@google-cloud/nodejs-repo-tools": "^3.3.0",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there's an open PR for the repo-metadata.json, at which point we can just get rid of this dependency all together.

@bcoe bcoe left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. A thought, it might be nice to stand up a proxy internally that we could use to write integration tests for the new apiEndpoint functionality; it would be nice to see the setting chained all the way through.

We could at least test manually once all these are setup by running a local proxy.

@JustinBeckwith

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

+1 to that - for now I'm just getting the plumbing hooked up

@JustinBeckwith
JustinBeckwith merged commit f701358 into master Jun 3, 2019
@stephenplusplus
stephenplusplus deleted the apiendpoint branch June 3, 2019 17:20
@stephenplusplus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

image

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants