Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 4, 2026. It is now read-only.

refactor(typescript): enable noImplicitAny#553

Merged
schmidt-sebastian merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
mrschmidt-noimplicitany
Feb 25, 2019
Merged

refactor(typescript): enable noImplicitAny#553
schmidt-sebastian merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
mrschmidt-noimplicitany

Conversation

@schmidt-sebastian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@schmidt-sebastian schmidt-sebastian commented Feb 22, 2019

This removes no-implicit-any from the SDK.

Fixes: #525

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Feb 22, 2019
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Feb 22, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #553 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 97.87%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #553      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.85%   95.86%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1932     1933       +1     
  Branches      168      168              
==========================================
+ Hits         1852     1853       +1     
  Misses         57       57              
  Partials       23       23
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dev/src/field-value.ts 93.75% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/types.ts 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/logger.ts 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/geo-point.ts 91.66% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/document-change.ts 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/path.ts 97.61% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/timestamp.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/watch.ts 99.04% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/write-batch.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/serializer.ts 96.59% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
... and 4 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b1f6c75...8f92627. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Feb 22, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #553 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 98.07%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #553      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.85%   95.85%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1932     1931       -1     
  Branches      168      168              
==========================================
- Hits         1852     1851       -1     
  Misses         57       57              
  Partials       23       23
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dev/src/field-value.ts 93.75% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/types.ts 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/logger.ts 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/geo-point.ts 91.66% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/document-change.ts 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/path.ts 97.61% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/timestamp.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/watch.ts 99.04% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/write-batch.ts 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
dev/src/serializer.ts 96.51% <100%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
... and 4 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8b5d087...ea2ddfa. Read the comment docs.

@schmidt-sebastian schmidt-sebastian changed the title WIP: No implicit any No implicit any Feb 25, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mikelehen mikelehen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment thread dev/src/index.ts Outdated
* document was read.
* @param encoding 'json' to indicate the format of `document` and `readTime`.
* @returns The QueryDocumentSnapshot with the document's data.
*/
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hrm. Duplicating all the docs for each overload like this seems a bit verbose and likely to get out-of-sync over time. Was there a particular motivation? I don't feel strongly, so feel free to leave as-is.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was mostly intended to get IntelliJ to stop warning me about missing docs for some of the arguments (since the overloads use different argument names). Since I wasn't 100% convinced of this when I did it, I removed this part of the changes. I did keep the overloads though.

@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith changed the title No implicit any refactor(typescript): enable noImplicitAny Feb 25, 2019
@schmidt-sebastian schmidt-sebastian merged commit 257abb9 into master Feb 25, 2019
@schmidt-sebastian schmidt-sebastian deleted the mrschmidt-noimplicitany branch February 25, 2019 21:44
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants