feat(geo): add support for geography#397
feat(geo): add support for geography#397steffnay merged 14 commits intogoogleapis:masterfrom steffnay:add-geo
Conversation
…d to be touched. tests totally failing
|
It looks like the lint task is being a bit faily. You could try running > @google-cloud/[email protected] posttest /tmpfs/src/github/nodejs-bigquery
> npm run check
> @google-cloud/[email protected] check /tmpfs/src/github/nodejs-bigquery
> gts check
/tmpfs/src/github/nodejs-bigquery/system-test/bigquery.ts
Lines: 1309-1321
table = dataset.table(generateName('table'));
return table.create({
schema: [
- 'date:DATE',
- 'datetime:DATETIME',
- 'time:TIME',
- 'timestamp:TIMESTAMP',
- 'numeric:NUMERIC',
- 'geography:GEOGRAPHY'
+ 'date:DATE', 'datetime:DATETIME', 'time:TIME', 'timestamp:TIMESTAMP',
+ 'numeric:NUMERIC', 'geography:GEOGRAPHY'
].join(', '),
});
});
clang-format reported errors... run `gts fix` to address. |
|
We should add some tests to the SQL Parameter system-tests. |
JustinBeckwith
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, assuming callmehiphop signs off
callmehiphop
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, I think all we're missing are some tests. We should make sure that we can
- use Geography as a SQL Parameter
- unit test that
GEOGRAPHYreturns aGeographyobject.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #397 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.45% 99.46% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 550 556 +6
Branches 76 76
==========================================
+ Hits 547 553 +6
Misses 2 2
Partials 1 1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
JustinBeckwith
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM assuming no new skipped tests are added
|
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
@JustinBeckwith @jkwlui can one of you please defeat the cursed cla 🤖 megaboss? |
|
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
🎉 |
Trying to locate which portions of code need to be touched. tests totally failing!
Just seeking feedback on how this should actually be done.