Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 24, 2026. It is now read-only.

fix: split connection pool based on credential#2388

Merged
GaoleMeng merged 2 commits intogoogleapis:mainfrom
GaoleMeng:main
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

fix: split connection pool based on credential#2388
GaoleMeng merged 2 commits intogoogleapis:mainfrom
GaoleMeng:main

Conversation

@GaoleMeng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> ☕️

If you write sample code, please follow the samples format.

@GaoleMeng GaoleMeng requested review from a team and Linchin January 31, 2024 00:19
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: m Pull request size is medium. api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. labels Jan 31, 2024
}
this.location = location;
CredentialsProvider credentialsProvider = client.getSettings().getCredentialsProvider();
log.warning("The credentials gotten is " + credentialsProvider.getCredentials());
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we printing this out?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wrong debug log, removed

ConnectionPoolKey.create(location),
ConnectionPoolKey.create(
location,
credentialsProvider != null ? credentialsProvider.getCredentials() : null),
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we use a hash for the key instead? I am wondering if there could be a security concern here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed to use hash

@GaoleMeng GaoleMeng force-pushed the main branch 4 times, most recently from 09fa9f4 to 8d661a9 Compare February 1, 2024 01:57
@GaoleMeng GaoleMeng added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Feb 1, 2024
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Feb 1, 2024
@GaoleMeng GaoleMeng force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 7dc6243 to a8c01ed Compare February 2, 2024 01:19
@GaoleMeng GaoleMeng requested a review from a team February 2, 2024 01:19
@GaoleMeng GaoleMeng force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from c03fe54 to fb34006 Compare February 2, 2024 01:37
@GaoleMeng GaoleMeng added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Feb 2, 2024
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Feb 2, 2024
@GaoleMeng GaoleMeng merged commit 08bc846 into googleapis:main Feb 2, 2024
zhumin8 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
…-config (#2679)

These dependencies were added in #2388 with hardcoded versions.
We prefer getting these versions from sdk-platform-java-config (includes both auth and gax versions).

auth is included in dependencyManagement here in gapic-generator-java-bom, which is part of first-party-dependencies, and eventually included via sdk-platform-java-config.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. size: m Pull request size is medium.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants