[Storage] Update download requester pays sample#2466
[Storage] Update download requester pays sample#2466frankyn merged 4 commits intogoogleapis:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Found an issue in my PR. Fixing now. |
|
PTAL, thank you. |
jabubake
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Frank, can you also update
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-java/blob/master/google-cloud-examples/src/main/java/com/google/cloud/examples/storage/snippets/StorageSnippets.java#L1103 to use BucketField.BILLING to retrieve the Requester-Pays status ? Please merge after a google-cloud-java release, so that these updates are available in the release package.
| import java.net.URL; | ||
| import java.nio.ByteBuffer; | ||
| import java.nio.file.Path; | ||
| import java.nio.file.Paths; |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign. Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g.
|
|
Signed it! |
|
CLAs look good, thanks! |
|
Thanks for your help @jabubake. I have updated the sample. PTAL. |
|
LGTM : might want to hold on merge/ doc update till a |
|
Thanks Jisha! Do you know when the next release will be out? |
|
Thanks @vam-google! I want to verify that the library was released and it should now contain the latest changes made for this PR to be able to merge. Is this the current state? |
|
I think the release was completed 2 days ago. @neozwu please confirm. But in general I don't see any reasons to not push this change. |
|
You are good to go on merge. See /releases for this repository |
|
Thank you @vam-google and @jabubake! |
This PR is to update the download sample for requester pays. It also fixes a object type mismatch in the commented section.
@jabubake if I missed something on updating another requester pays sample with the recent fixes please let me know and I'll resolve the issues.