Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

java: optimize partition key#1125

Merged
pongad merged 1 commit intogoogleapis:masterfrom
pongad:partition-key
Mar 21, 2017
Merged

java: optimize partition key#1125
pongad merged 1 commit intogoogleapis:masterfrom
pongad:partition-key

Conversation

@pongad
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pongad pongad commented Mar 21, 2017

@codecov-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-io commented Mar 21, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1125 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1125   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     84.83%   84.83%           
  Complexity     3633     3633           
=========================================
  Files           368      368           
  Lines         14460    14460           
  Branches       1661     1661           
=========================================
  Hits          12267    12267           
  Misses         1748     1748           
  Partials        445      445
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...pi/codegen/viewmodel/BatchingPartitionKeyView.java 100% <ø> (ø) 2 <0> (ø) ⬇️
...e/api/codegen/transformer/BatchingTransformer.java 100% <ø> (ø) 16 <0> (ø) ⬇️
.../transformer/java/JavaGapicSurfaceTransformer.java 98.79% <100%> (ø) 43 <0> (ø) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update db3db26...a1c836e. Read the comment docs.

@pongad pongad merged commit 4d79dcc into googleapis:master Mar 21, 2017
@pongad pongad deleted the partition-key branch March 21, 2017 22:31
garrettjonesgoogle added a commit to garrettjonesgoogle/toolkit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants