Fix deprecated API usage in ToolsLocator by breskeby · Pull Request #786 · google/protobuf-gradle-plugin

breskeby · 2025-09-03T14:24:04Z

Gradle 9.1 deprecates declaring dependencies using multi-string notation.
Instead single-string notation should be used instead.

See https://docs.gradle.org/9.1.0-rc-2/userguide/upgrading_version_9.html#dependency_multi_string_notation for details.

This fixes the ToolLocator by using the prefered single-string notation now

google-cla · 2025-09-03T14:24:10Z

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Gradle 9.1 deprecates declaring dependencies using multi-string notation. Instead single-string notation should be used instead.

Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged.

breskeby · 2025-09-18T14:56:40Z

thanks for merging. are there any plans to run another release of this plugin that contains this PR anytime soon?

Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged.

* WIP gradle 9.0 update * Fix build integration tests * Avoid usage of archives configuration * Reference PR build for protobuf plugin Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged.

* WIP gradle 9.0 update * Fix build integration tests * Avoid usage of archives configuration * Reference PR build for protobuf plugin Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged. (cherry picked from commit 71be643) # Conflicts: # x-pack/plugin/otel-data/build.gradle

* WIP gradle 9.0 update * Fix build integration tests * Avoid usage of archives configuration * Reference PR build for protobuf plugin Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged. (cherry picked from commit 71be643) # Conflicts: # build-tools-internal/src/main/resources/minimumGradleVersion # x-pack/plugin/otel-data/build.gradle

* Update Gradle wrapper to 9.1.0 (#132970) * WIP gradle 9.0 update * Fix build integration tests * Avoid usage of archives configuration * Reference PR build for protobuf plugin Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged. (cherry picked from commit 71be643) # Conflicts: # build-tools-internal/src/main/resources/minimumGradleVersion # x-pack/plugin/otel-data/build.gradle * Delete config.js

* Update Gradle wrapper to 9.1.0 (#132970) * WIP gradle 9.0 update * Fix build integration tests * Avoid usage of archives configuration * Reference PR build for protobuf plugin Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged. (cherry picked from commit 71be643) # Conflicts: # x-pack/plugin/otel-data/build.gradle * Delete config.js

andrross · 2025-09-22T22:38:28Z

@ejona86 I'm also interested in getting this fix into a release to avoid warnings when using Gradle 9.1. Is another release planned? I'm happy to help if there's anything I can do to help with the release.

liutikas · 2025-09-22T23:10:09Z

@ejona86 could we release a new version of the plugin that has this fix?

danishnawab · 2025-10-14T15:14:25Z

Would appreciate a new release containing this change.

Can you please offer some transparency into when that might be?

wjglerum · 2025-10-27T10:07:18Z

Same here, any news on a new release?

danishnawab · 2025-11-13T13:41:50Z

@ejona86 any chance to get an ETA here?

jjohannes · 2025-11-14T16:27:31Z

A new release to remove the deprecation warning with current Gradle versions would be highly appreciated.

Declaring dependencies using multi-string notation has been deprecated. This will fail with an error in Gradle 10. Please use single-string notation instead: "com.google.protobuf:protoc::osx-aarch_64@exe".

nillpoe · 2025-12-09T07:44:44Z

Same here, eagerly waiting for the release

autonomousapps · 2025-12-11T17:37:00Z

Also chiming in to say that my team would love a release. Is it... hard to release a new version?

marcphilipp · 2025-12-15T08:49:22Z

We would also love to see this released. Is there anything anyone can do to help?

…0947) This is a followup of #132970 after google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 has been merged. It removes the dependency on a deleted snapshot build of the protobuf-gradle-plugin and updates to the official 0.9.6 release. The changes eliminate the temporary workaround that was needed for Java 9.1 compatibility. Changes: - Updated to official `protobuf-gradle-plugin` version 0.9.6 - Removed buildscript block with JitPack repository and snapshot dependency

…stic#140947) This is a followup of elastic#132970 after google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 has been merged. It removes the dependency on a deleted snapshot build of the protobuf-gradle-plugin and updates to the official 0.9.6 release. The changes eliminate the temporary workaround that was needed for Java 9.1 compatibility. Changes: - Updated to official `protobuf-gradle-plugin` version 0.9.6 - Removed buildscript block with JitPack repository and snapshot dependency (cherry picked from commit d27f55f)

…0947) (#140985) This is a followup of #132970 after google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 has been merged. It removes the dependency on a deleted snapshot build of the protobuf-gradle-plugin and updates to the official 0.9.6 release. The changes eliminate the temporary workaround that was needed for Java 9.1 compatibility. Changes: - Updated to official `protobuf-gradle-plugin` version 0.9.6 - Removed buildscript block with JitPack repository and snapshot dependency (cherry picked from commit d27f55f) Co-authored-by: Federico Ressi <[email protected]>

…0947) (#140983) This is a followup of #132970 after google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 has been merged. It removes the dependency on a deleted snapshot build of the protobuf-gradle-plugin and updates to the official 0.9.6 release. The changes eliminate the temporary workaround that was needed for Java 9.1 compatibility. Changes: - Updated to official `protobuf-gradle-plugin` version 0.9.6 - Removed buildscript block with JitPack repository and snapshot dependency (cherry picked from commit d27f55f) Co-authored-by: Federico Ressi <[email protected]>

…stic#140947) This is a followup of elastic#132970 after google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 has been merged. It removes the dependency on a deleted snapshot build of the protobuf-gradle-plugin and updates to the official 0.9.6 release. The changes eliminate the temporary workaround that was needed for Java 9.1 compatibility. Changes: - Updated to official `protobuf-gradle-plugin` version 0.9.6 - Removed buildscript block with JitPack repository and snapshot dependency

* Update Gradle wrapper to 9.1.0 (#132970) * WIP gradle 9.0 update * Fix build integration tests * Avoid usage of archives configuration * Reference PR build for protobuf plugin Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged. (cherry picked from commit 163c627163b61a1e2f37a217f854593638b3b9c8) # Conflicts: # build-tools-internal/src/main/resources/minimumGradleVersion # x-pack/plugin/otel-data/build.gradle * Delete config.js

breskeby force-pushed the fix-91-incompatibility branch 3 times, most recently from 7c412ae to 2726fcf Compare September 3, 2025 14:48

Fix deprecated API usage in ToolsLocator

d66789b

Gradle 9.1 deprecates declaring dependencies using multi-string notation. Instead single-string notation should be used instead.

breskeby force-pushed the fix-91-incompatibility branch from 2726fcf to d66789b Compare September 3, 2025 14:51

breskeby added a commit to breskeby/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025

Reference PR build for protobuf plugin

28d9704

Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged.

eskatos approved these changes Sep 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

ejona86 approved these changes Sep 9, 2025

View reviewed changes

ejona86 merged commit 894f2d2 into google:master Sep 9, 2025
11 checks passed

breskeby added a commit to breskeby/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025

Reference PR build for protobuf plugin

df57012

Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged.

breskeby added a commit to breskeby/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025

Reference PR build for protobuf plugin

9630654

Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged.

breskeby added a commit to breskeby/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025

Reference PR build for protobuf plugin

d9eb894

Temporary fix until the PR against the protobuf plugin at google/protobuf-gradle-plugin#786 is merged.

ejona86 mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2025

Compatibility with Gradle 9 #775

Closed

sergeykad mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2025

Gradle 10 compatibility issue #791

Closed

fressi-elastic mentioned this pull request Jan 20, 2026

It stops using deleted snapshot of google/protobuf-gradle-plugin elastic/elasticsearch#140947

Merged

timocov mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2026

Locator dependency being created with invalid version value if it is not specified #798

Open

jjohannes mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2026

fix: empty versions are represented by "" and not by "null" #802

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Fix deprecated API usage in ToolsLocator#786

Fix deprecated API usage in ToolsLocator#786
ejona86 merged 1 commit into
google:masterfrom
breskeby:fix-91-incompatibility

breskeby commented Sep 3, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

google-cla Bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

breskeby commented Sep 18, 2025

Uh oh!

andrross commented Sep 22, 2025

Uh oh!

liutikas commented Sep 22, 2025

Uh oh!

danishnawab commented Oct 14, 2025

Uh oh!

wjglerum commented Oct 27, 2025

Uh oh!

danishnawab commented Nov 13, 2025

Uh oh!

jjohannes commented Nov 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

nillpoe commented Dec 9, 2025

Uh oh!

autonomousapps commented Dec 11, 2025

Uh oh!

marcphilipp commented Dec 15, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

11 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

breskeby commented Sep 3, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

google-cla Bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

breskeby commented Sep 18, 2025

Uh oh!

andrross commented Sep 22, 2025

Uh oh!

liutikas commented Sep 22, 2025

Uh oh!

danishnawab commented Oct 14, 2025

Uh oh!

wjglerum commented Oct 27, 2025

Uh oh!

danishnawab commented Nov 13, 2025

Uh oh!

jjohannes commented Nov 14, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

nillpoe commented Dec 9, 2025

Uh oh!

autonomousapps commented Dec 11, 2025

Uh oh!

marcphilipp commented Dec 15, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

11 participants

breskeby commented Sep 3, 2025 •

edited

Loading

jjohannes commented Nov 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading