Skip to content

python-multipart: initial integration#8398

Closed
manunio wants to merge 3 commits into
google:masterfrom
manunio:python-multipart
Closed

python-multipart: initial integration#8398
manunio wants to merge 3 commits into
google:masterfrom
manunio:python-multipart

Conversation

@manunio

@manunio manunio commented Sep 2, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi, python-multipart is a streaming multipart parser for Python.
It has 2 million+ monthly downloads as per pypistats, and is being used by projects like fastapi, starlette.

@manunio

manunio commented Sep 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @jonathanmetzman please review this pr.

@manunio

manunio commented Sep 12, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @Navidem please review this pr :)

@jonathanmetzman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Has upstream agreed to this?

@manunio

manunio commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Has upstream agreed to this?

@jonathanmetzman There's no response yet.

@jonathanmetzman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Has upstream agreed to this?

@jonathanmetzman There's no response yet.

We don't accept projects unless upstream agrees

@manunio

manunio commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Has upstream agreed to this?

@jonathanmetzman There's no response yet.

We don't accept projects unless upstream agrees

@jonathanmetzman thanks for the review, can you please clear doubt of mine. I can see pr #8347 with no response being merged. Whats the difference here? Just curious thanks.

@jonathanmetzman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Has upstream agreed to this?

@jonathanmetzman There's no response yet.

We don't accept projects unless upstream agrees

@jonathanmetzman thanks for the review, can you please clear doubt of mine. I can see pr #8347 with no response being merged. Whats the difference here? Just curious thanks.

These are our contractors and we treat these projects differently.

@manunio

manunio commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

These are our contractors and we treat these projects differently.

@jonathanmetzman a previous pr: #8279 of mine was merged same way, that's why it was creating confusion for me.

@jonathanmetzman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I probably shouldn't have merged it because there's no one upstream to accept bug reports, but there's a linked issue where upstream agreed to the integration. Here there is nothing

@manunio

manunio commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I probably shouldn't have merged it because there's no one upstream to accept bug reports, but there's a linked issue where upstream agreed to the integration. Here there is nothing

Yes, that was because maintainer agreed a day or two later. and thanks for clearing my doubts I'll keep this in mind for my contributions :)

@jonathanmetzman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I probably shouldn't have merged it because there's no one upstream to accept bug reports, but there's a linked issue where upstream agreed to the integration. Here there is nothing

Yes, that was because maintainer agreed a day or two later. and thanks for clearing my doubts I'll keep this in mind for my contributions :)

Yeah youre right, their agreement was later. I shouldn't have merged it but it ended up being OK.

@manunio manunio marked this pull request as draft September 21, 2022 16:39
@manunio manunio closed this Jan 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants