You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Improve DoubleNearPredFormat output on bad epsilons
DoubleNearPredFormat will happily accept epsilon values (abs_error) that
are so small that they are meaningless. This turns EXPECT_NEAR into a
complicated and non-obvious version of EXPECT_EQ.
This change modifies DoubleNearPredFormat) so that when there is a
failure it calculates the smallest meaningful epsilon value, given the
input values, and then prints a message which explains what happened.
If a true equality test is wanted either pass a literal 0.0 as abs_error
or use EXPECT_EQ. If a check for being almost equal is wanted consider
using EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ which, contrary to its name, verifies that the
two numbers are *almost* equal (within four ULPs).
With this change the flaky test mentioned in crbug.com/786046 gives this
output:
The difference between 4.2934311416234112e+18 and 4.2934311416234107e+18 is 512, where
4.2934311416234112e+18 evaluates to 4.2934311416234112e+18,
4.2934311416234107e+18 evaluates to 4.2934311416234107e+18.
The abs_error parameter 1.0 evaluates to 1 which is smaller than the minimum distance between doubles for numbers of this magnitude which is 512, thus making this EXPECT_NEAR check equivalent to EXPECT_EQUAL. Consider using EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ instead.
Tested:
I confirmed that this change detects the bad epsilon value that caused
crbug.com/786046 in Chromium and added a test for the desired output.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 332946880
0 commit comments