Skip to content

Comments

For storage bit images, we still need to prime their data by copying#1728

Merged
qining merged 1 commit intogoogle:masterfrom
qining:fallback-storage-image
Mar 9, 2018
Merged

For storage bit images, we still need to prime their data by copying#1728
qining merged 1 commit intogoogle:masterfrom
qining:fallback-storage-image

Conversation

@qining
Copy link
Contributor

@qining qining commented Mar 7, 2018

The fallback mode should only be dropped when the feature is implemented

@qining qining requested a review from AWoloszyn March 7, 2018 17:43
Copy link
Contributor

@AWoloszyn AWoloszyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would just check the windows build first.

@qining qining force-pushed the fallback-storage-image branch 2 times, most recently from ffc05eb to 71d9d78 Compare March 8, 2018 15:31
The fallback mode should only be dropped when the feature is implemented
@qining qining force-pushed the fallback-storage-image branch from 71d9d78 to 514de6b Compare March 8, 2018 21:23
qining added a commit to qining/gapid that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
For D24 format with either X8 or S8 channel, the depth element size is
different for copying through buffer and storing in the image. We need
to manually strip the MSB byte when processing the data if the data is
retrieved through buffer image copy.

sits on top of google#1728
qining added a commit to qining/gapid that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
For D24 format with either X8 or S8 channel, the depth element size is
different for copying through buffer and storing in the image. We need
to manually strip the MSB byte when processing the data if the data is
retrieved through buffer image copy.

sits on top of google#1728
@qining qining merged commit a729b0c into google:master Mar 9, 2018
qining added a commit to qining/gapid that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2018
For D24 format with either X8 or S8 channel, the depth element size is
different for copying through buffer and storing in the image. We need
to manually strip the MSB byte when processing the data if the data is
retrieved through buffer image copy.

sits on top of google#1728
@qining qining deleted the fallback-storage-image branch October 23, 2018 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants