The cv is the "coefficient of variation" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_variation), which is a dimensionless number (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensionless_quantity).

So the time unit should either be removed, or it should be empty. Currently, it contains "ns", which is definitely wrong.

The cv is the "coefficient of variation" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_variation), which is a dimensionless number (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensionless_quantity).

Yep, i know that, i added it.

So the time unit should either be removed, or it should be empty. Currently, it contains "ns", which is definitely wrong.

I'm sorry, this is not productive. I'm telling you it is there intentionally, and you ignored that comment.
Perhaps i would recommend to, instead of saying what should be done, to say what you believe goes wrong
with the things they are now.

I'm telling you it is there intentionally, and you ignored that comment.

I'm sorry. Would you mind sharing why the time unit for the cv is intentionally "ns" even though it is a dimensionless quantity?

Also note that the console output does not contain a time unit for the cv. Is the console output intentionally inconsistent with the json output?

I'm telling you it is there intentionally, and you ignored that comment.

I'm sorry. Would you mind sharing why the time unit for the cv is intentionally "ns" even though it is a dimensionless quantity?

tool/compare.py (namely partition_benchmarks() in tools/gbench/report.py)
requires time_unit to be present to correctly distinguish the repetitions of the same benchmark.

Also note that the console output does not contain a time unit for the cv. Is the console output intentionally inconsistent with the json output?

time_unit does not mean "the dimension/unit of the whatever we happened to cram into
the 'real_time'/`cpu_time' fields" (i mean, cv is clearly not time :)).
We don't have a field that is intentionally designed to supply such information.
I'm guessing that is what you were looking for?

Ok, apparently i forgot. There is aggregate_unit = percentage field for aggregates.

tool/compare.py (namely partition_benchmarks() in tools/gbench/report.py) requires time_unit to be present to correctly distinguish the repetitions of the same benchmark.

It works just fine, though, if I set the time_unit to the empty string instead of removing it.

I have reverted the JSON change for now, though I'm not yet really convinced yet that there isn't a better option.

time_unit does not mean "the dimension/unit of the whatever we happened to cram into the 'real_time'/`cpu_time' fields"

This is very surprising (and begs the question what it does mean then). In particular, given that there is a field with the identical name time_unit in the Run struct in benchmark.h, and two similarly named fields real_accumulated_time and cpu_accumulated_time, and that there is a function with the comment Return a value representing the real time per iteration in the unit specified by 'time_unit'.

It would be really helpful if such non-obvious and non-intuitive design choices could be documented somewhere.

the plan of record is: don't add new functionality because we should instead rely on the JSON output and have a separate tool to create the CSV from JSON.

this got stuck behind an aborted effort to have a v2 that had some deeper API changes. i don't have a strong opinion on whether we should continue to try to deprecate the CSV output or not, tbh. while it's here and in use, we should at least make sure it's correct though.