Skip to content

Images that are included into instructions via {artifact.<name>} syntax should allow a underlying LLM for image processing/interpeting. #4674

Closed

Description

@Manomenu

🔴 Required Information

Is your feature request related to a specific problem?

I'm always frustrated when I have to manually handle putting artifacts back to Content to enable underlying LLM image processing.

Describe the Solution You'd Like

It would be nice to be able to just add image to content via including in a LLMAgent instuction {artifact.<image_name} and it would be correctly processed.

Impact on your work

Just better user experience.

Willingness to contribute

Yes, but others can implement it too.


🟡 Recommended Information

Describe Alternatives You've Considered

N/A

Proposed API / Implementation

N/A

Additional Context

N/A

Activity

  1. added
    core[Component] This issue is related to the core interface and implementation
    on Mar 2, 2026
  2. added theissue type on Mar 2, 2026
  3. klateefa commented on Mar 4, 2026

    @klateefa

    @Manomenu Thanks for opening this issue!
    We’d like to understand the expectation more clearly.Could you provide a bit more detail?This will help us assist you better
    Thanks.

  4. self-assigned this
    on Mar 4, 2026
  5. added
    request clarification[Status] The maintainer need clarification or more information from the author
    on Mar 4, 2026
  6. Manomenu commented on Mar 11, 2026

    @Manomenu
    Author

    @klateefa Users have to provide prompts for newly created Agents and I noticed that it is possible to inject artifact content by {artifact.} syntax, right?

    Also noticed, that if user tries to inject image stored as artifact a underyling model isn't able to process that image. It only works if image is attached as separate content part kinda manually. (i tested it on qwen3-vl)

    It would be just much much more convenient if image attaching was that easy as I described.

  7. added
    needs review[Status] The PR/issue is awaiting review from the maintainer
    and removed
    request clarification[Status] The maintainer need clarification or more information from the author
    on Jul 10, 2026
  8. DeanChensj commented on Oct 14, 2026

    @DeanChensj
    Collaborator

    Hi @Manomenu, thank you for reporting this issue!

    This has been resolved by PR #7391 and merged into the main branch in commit cd5814e.

    We are closing this issue as resolved. If you find that the issue persists on the latest ADK release or if this was closed in error, please feel free to reopen it or leave a comment! Thank you again for your contribution.

  9. github-actions commented on Oct 14, 2026

    @github-actions

    Are you satisfied with the resolution of your issue?
    Yes
    No

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

core[Component] This issue is related to the core interface and implementationneeds review[Status] The PR/issue is awaiting review from the maintainer

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions