prop: copy initial values and store as pointers internally#310
Merged
prop: copy initial values and store as pointers internally#310
Conversation
Without using pointers internally, accepting structs using Store wouldn't work properly. This requires making a copy of the initial values (which were documented already as "initial" values, but were indeed just reused by the existing code). But using them directly was anyway not possible since access not going through Get or GetMust could have led to race conditions anyway. Fixes #298.
guelfey
force-pushed
the
fix/prop_pointers
branch
from
43289f1 to
e230c8c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Without using pointers internally, accepting structs using Store
wouldn't work properly. This requires making a copy of the initial
values (which were documented already as "initial" values, but were
indeed just reused by the existing code). But using them directly was
anyway not possible since access not going through Get or GetMust could
have led to race conditions anyway.
Fixes #298.