arch: refactor LLM_TENSOR_NAMES #18051
Merged
+1,897
−2,284
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
while working on #18042 , I want to add a new arch GLM4V which is mostly the same as GLM4, but use M-RoPE instead of normal RoPE.
However, I feel like sometimes it can be quite too redundant to duplicate the list of tensors and cgraph (for cgraph, we can reuse the same file, but switch rope type using
template)This PR propose a new way to organize model tensors naming, bring it more aligned with the
convert_hf_to_gguf.pyscript, while also allow multiple models to reuse the same mapping.TODO in a follow-up PR: also update the mapping in
convert_hf_to_gguf.pyto allow models to reuse the same mappingsThis PR was mostly generated using this script: https://gist.github.com/ngxson/a20411de6bc66a84a4d354b254bfe4da
Before
After