Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Yeah on second thought, it may be a bit naive to let the public decide how urgent their issue is. I think we should still have the label available, but assigned by the team instead. But it does make sense to split by subsystems. Happy to hear others thoughts, but if you can make a PR with your proposal you have my support at least. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the feedback. I'll think deeper on what's the best way to split the issue into appropriate categories. Will make a PR later when it's more clear for me. I also agree to keep these labels, but only use by collaborators. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When creating new issues, the high severity and critical severity labels seem to be misused very often.
This is some of my ideas to improve the situation:
inference quality,crash,gpu-relatedIssue related to llama-cliIssue related to llama-serverIssue related to specific modelsIssue related to core libraryOther issuesWhat do you think about this @mofosyne ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions