Skip to content

Switch from Paperclip to Active Storage (WIP)#434

Closed
manno wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
active-storage
Closed

Switch from Paperclip to Active Storage (WIP)#434
manno wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
active-storage

Conversation

@manno
Copy link
Member

@manno manno commented Oct 3, 2018

  • Test DB and asset dir migration, can we migrate to public/sytem instead of storage?
  • Source code uses active storage instead
  • Paperclip is removed from source
  • Document how to update existing installations
  • Eager loading where required
  • Validations (wait for Rails 6.0?)
  • Schedule export works
  • Default avatar instead of nil

This should fix:

Relates to:

@manno
Copy link
Member Author

manno commented Mar 17, 2019

@manno
Copy link
Member Author

manno commented Jun 25, 2019

manno added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2020
Ideally frab would have switched to activestorage.
This should get rid of warnings for now.

#434
manno added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2020
Ideally frab would have switched to activestorage.
This should get rid of warnings for now.

#434
manno added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2020
Ideally frab would have switched to activestorage.
This should get rid of warnings for now.

#434
manno added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2020
Ideally frab would have switched to activestorage.
This should get rid of warnings for now.

#434
@saerdnaer saerdnaer marked this pull request as draft January 7, 2021 19:38
@manno
Copy link
Member Author

manno commented Oct 20, 2021

Closing this, as https://github.com/kreeti/kt-paperclip is maintained and provides compatibility.

@manno manno closed this Oct 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant