Skip to content

base: ovmf: Increase ScratchMemory buffer for openssl#1575

Merged
ldts merged 1 commit intofoundriesio:mainfrom
ldts:ovmf
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

base: ovmf: Increase ScratchMemory buffer for openssl#1575
ldts merged 1 commit intofoundriesio:mainfrom
ldts:ovmf

Conversation

@ldts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ldts ldts commented Feb 5, 2025

No description provided.

@ldts ldts requested a review from a team February 5, 2025 13:38
@ldts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ldts commented Feb 5, 2025

Not applying this upstreamed fix resolved during the LmP UEFI provisioning development - tianocore/edk2#6394 - causes OVMF to run out of memory if EDK2 uses OpenSSL 3.x to enroll the provisioning certificates.

@ldts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ldts commented Feb 5, 2025

so just a mirror of 3e9393a


[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/efitools.git

Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/6394]
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The upstream status should be Backport as the path is already merged

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, did just replicate the EDK2 so we should then just change both?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

right, so we can update the both to be Backport.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ricardosalveti ricardosalveti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ldts ldts merged commit 8b8de4a into foundriesio:main Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants