Deprecate meta-xilinx - Remove the LmP direct support#1553
Merged
angolini merged 1 commit intofoundriesio:mainfrom Jan 16, 2025
Merged
Deprecate meta-xilinx - Remove the LmP direct support#1553angolini merged 1 commit intofoundriesio:mainfrom
angolini merged 1 commit intofoundriesio:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
|
Should we drop in a big commit and move the current logic to a meta-partner layer? I know we want to remove it from this layer, but we will have to add it all over again once we bring the latest bsp in a partner layer. |
Contributor
|
I think we can keep these removal commits and mimic them when we add these back to a partner layer. |
Member
|
The only issue is that most changes should later be applied at the same time, unless we break the removal into several commits (per logical blocks). I personally prefer with a big single commit, but fine with either way. |
Member
|
some more pieces to drop: |
Member
|
And also meta-lmp-bsp/dynamic-layers/xilinx-tools |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks José, I haven't realized |
Contributor
Author
|
I prefer a huge commit, so I'm going to squash everything |
8ff4123 to
b6a3894
Compare
The plan is to include it as a partner layer, this way we can better handle versioning. Searching (find and grep) for the following keywords: * kv260 * zynqmp * uz3eg * versal * vck190 * kria * ultrazed * xlnx Signed-off-by: Daiane Angolini <[email protected]>
b6a3894 to
d8c9769
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
updated |
angolini
added a commit
to angolini/meta-lmp
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2025
Since [1] the Xilinx BSP is removed from meta-lmp. At that time the keywords "uz" and "k26" were missing from the search, so these files were missed during the removal. This commit removes them. [1] foundriesio#1553 Signed-off-by: Daiane Angolini <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2025
Since [1] the Xilinx BSP is removed from meta-lmp. At that time the keywords "uz" and "k26" were missing from the search, so these files were missed during the removal. This commit removes them. [1] #1553 Signed-off-by: Daiane Angolini <[email protected]>
mike-scott
pushed a commit
to mike-scott/meta-lmp
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2025
Since [1] the Xilinx BSP is removed from meta-lmp. At that time the keywords "uz" and "k26" were missing from the search, so these files were missed during the removal. This commit removes them. [1] foundriesio#1553 Signed-off-by: Daiane Angolini <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The plan is to have the support added as an partner layer, this way we can easier handle versioning.
This patch was created basically searching (find and grep) for the following keywords:
I personally prefer one huge commit, please let me know what would be the best way to cluster the changes.
I tested by trying to build the removed images, but this is not good enough. So any idea on how to better test it, please let me know