Imx6q caam clk#4
Closed
ldts wants to merge 2 commits intolinux-v5.8.yfrom
Closed
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <[email protected]>
Since the TEE will be using the CAAM, set the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag on these clocks to prevent the kernel from gating them. Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2020
commit 2d9a2c5 upstream. Before v4.15 commit 75492a5 ("s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()"), we intentionally only passed zfcp_adapter as context argument to zfcp_fsf_request_timeout_handler(). Since we only trigger adapter recovery, it was unnecessary to sync against races between timeout and (late) completion. Likewise, we only passed zfcp_erp_action as context argument to zfcp_erp_timeout_handler(). Since we only wakeup an ERP action, it was unnecessary to sync against races between timeout and (late) completion. Meanwhile the timeout handlers get timer_list as context argument and do a timer-specific container-of to zfcp_fsf_req which can have been freed. Fix it by making sure that any request timeout handlers, that might just have started before del_timer(), are completed by using del_timer_sync() instead. This ensures the request free happens afterwards. Space time diagram of potential use-after-free: Basic idea is to have 2 or more pending requests whose timeouts run out at almost the same time. req 1 timeout ERP thread req 2 timeout ---------------- ---------------- --------------------------------------- zfcp_fsf_request_timeout_handler fsf_req = from_timer(fsf_req, t, timer) adapter = fsf_req->adapter zfcp_qdio_siosl(adapter) zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen(adapter,...) zfcp_erp_strategy ... zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all list_for_each_entry_safe zfcp_fsf_req_complete 1 del_timer 1 zfcp_fsf_req_free 1 zfcp_fsf_req_complete 2 zfcp_fsf_request_timeout_handler del_timer 2 fsf_req = from_timer(fsf_req, t, timer) zfcp_fsf_req_free 2 adapter = fsf_req->adapter ^^^^^^^ already freed Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 75492a5 ("s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()") Cc: <[email protected]> #4.15+ Suggested-by: Julian Wiedmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Julian Wiedmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2020
[ Upstream commit b0f3b87 ] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565 PID: 257 TASK: ecdd0000 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "init" #0 [<c0b420ec>] (__schedule) from [<c0b423c8>] #1 [<c0b423c8>] (schedule) from [<c0b459d4>] #2 [<c0b459d4>] (rwsem_down_read_failed) from [<c0b44fa0>] #3 [<c0b44fa0>] (down_read) from [<c044233c>] #4 [<c044233c>] (f2fs_truncate_blocks) from [<c0442890>] #5 [<c0442890>] (f2fs_truncate) from [<c044d408>] #6 [<c044d408>] (f2fs_evict_inode) from [<c030be18>] #7 [<c030be18>] (evict) from [<c030a558>] #8 [<c030a558>] (iput) from [<c047c600>] #9 [<c047c600>] (f2fs_sync_node_pages) from [<c0465414>] #10 [<c0465414>] (f2fs_write_checkpoint) from [<c04575f4>] #11 [<c04575f4>] (f2fs_sync_fs) from [<c0441918>] #12 [<c0441918>] (f2fs_do_sync_file) from [<c0441098>] #13 [<c0441098>] (f2fs_sync_file) from [<c0323fa0>] #14 [<c0323fa0>] (vfs_fsync_range) from [<c0324294>] #15 [<c0324294>] (do_fsync) from [<c0324014>] #16 [<c0324014>] (sys_fsync) from [<c0108bc0>] This can be caused by flush_dirty_inode() in f2fs_sync_node_pages() where iput() requires f2fs_lock_op() again resulting in livelock. Reported-by: Zhiguo Niu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2020
commit 2d9a2c5 upstream. Before v4.15 commit 75492a5 ("s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()"), we intentionally only passed zfcp_adapter as context argument to zfcp_fsf_request_timeout_handler(). Since we only trigger adapter recovery, it was unnecessary to sync against races between timeout and (late) completion. Likewise, we only passed zfcp_erp_action as context argument to zfcp_erp_timeout_handler(). Since we only wakeup an ERP action, it was unnecessary to sync against races between timeout and (late) completion. Meanwhile the timeout handlers get timer_list as context argument and do a timer-specific container-of to zfcp_fsf_req which can have been freed. Fix it by making sure that any request timeout handlers, that might just have started before del_timer(), are completed by using del_timer_sync() instead. This ensures the request free happens afterwards. Space time diagram of potential use-after-free: Basic idea is to have 2 or more pending requests whose timeouts run out at almost the same time. req 1 timeout ERP thread req 2 timeout ---------------- ---------------- --------------------------------------- zfcp_fsf_request_timeout_handler fsf_req = from_timer(fsf_req, t, timer) adapter = fsf_req->adapter zfcp_qdio_siosl(adapter) zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen(adapter,...) zfcp_erp_strategy ... zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all list_for_each_entry_safe zfcp_fsf_req_complete 1 del_timer 1 zfcp_fsf_req_free 1 zfcp_fsf_req_complete 2 zfcp_fsf_request_timeout_handler del_timer 2 fsf_req = from_timer(fsf_req, t, timer) zfcp_fsf_req_free 2 adapter = fsf_req->adapter ^^^^^^^ already freed Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 75492a5 ("s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()") Cc: <[email protected]> #4.15+ Suggested-by: Julian Wiedmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Julian Wiedmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2020
commit e89c4a9 upstream. I got the following lockdep splat while testing: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/229626 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff828513f0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 but task is already holding lock: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #7 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #6 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480 commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #5 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #4 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 perf_read+0x141/0x2c0 vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150 perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900 _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130 cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60 smp_init+0x26/0x71 kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258 kernel_init+0xa/0x103 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->scrub_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by btrfs/229626: #0: ffff88bfe8bb86e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0xbd/0x630 #1: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 229626 Comm: btrfs Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 ? start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xca/0x160 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because we're allocating the scrub workqueues under the scrub and device list mutex, which brings in a whole host of other dependencies. Because the work queue allocation is done with GFP_KERNEL, it can trigger reclaim, which can lead to a transaction commit, which in turns needs the device_list_mutex, it can lead to a deadlock. A different problem for which this fix is a solution. Fix this by moving the actual allocation outside of the scrub lock, and then only take the lock once we're ready to actually assign them to the fs_info. We'll now have to cleanup the workqueues in a few more places, so I've added a helper to do the refcount dance to safely free the workqueues. CC: [email protected] # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2020
commit e89c4a9 upstream. I got the following lockdep splat while testing: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/229626 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff828513f0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 but task is already holding lock: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #7 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #6 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480 commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #5 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #4 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 perf_read+0x141/0x2c0 vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150 perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900 _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130 cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60 smp_init+0x26/0x71 kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258 kernel_init+0xa/0x103 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->scrub_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by btrfs/229626: #0: ffff88bfe8bb86e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0xbd/0x630 #1: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 229626 Comm: btrfs Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 ? start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xca/0x160 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because we're allocating the scrub workqueues under the scrub and device list mutex, which brings in a whole host of other dependencies. Because the work queue allocation is done with GFP_KERNEL, it can trigger reclaim, which can lead to a transaction commit, which in turns needs the device_list_mutex, it can lead to a deadlock. A different problem for which this fix is a solution. Fix this by moving the actual allocation outside of the scrub lock, and then only take the lock once we're ready to actually assign them to the fs_info. We'll now have to cleanup the workqueues in a few more places, so I've added a helper to do the refcount dance to safely free the workqueues. CC: [email protected] # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
[ Upstream commit 8a39e8c ] When compiling with DEBUG=1 on Fedora 32 I'm getting crash for 'perf test signal': Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () #1 0x00000000004d62e9 in test_function () at tests/bp_signal.c:61 #2 0x00000000004d689a in test__bp_signal (test=0xa8e280 <generic_ ... #3 0x00000000004b7d49 in run_test (test=0xa8e280 <generic_tests+1 ... #4 0x00000000004b7e7f in test_and_print (t=0xa8e280 <generic_test ... #5 0x00000000004b8927 in __cmd_test (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdce0, ... ... It's caused by the symbol __test_function being in the ".bss" section: $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [28] .bss NOBITS 0000000000c356a0 008346a0 00000000000511f8 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 32 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 0000000000c68548 B __test_function I guess most of the time we're just lucky the inline asm ended up in the ".text" section, so making it specific explicit with push and pop section clauses. $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [13] .text PROGBITS 0000000000431240 00031240 0000000000306faa 0000000000000000 AX 0 0 16 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 00000000004d62c8 T __test_function Committer testing: $ readelf -wi ~/bin/perf | grep producer -m1 <c> DW_AT_producer : (indirect string, offset: 0x254a): GNU C99 10.2.1 20200723 (Red Hat 10.2.1-1) -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -ggdb3 -std=gnu99 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fstack-protector-all ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ $ Before: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : FAILED! $ After: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : Ok $ Fixes: 8fd34e1 ("perf test: Improve bp_signal") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Petlan <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
[ Upstream commit 22fe5a2 ] The aliases were never released causing the following leaks: Indirect leak of 1224 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7feefb830628 in malloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x107628) #1 0x56332c8f1b62 in __perf_pmu__new_alias util/pmu.c:322 #2 0x56332c8f401f in pmu_add_cpu_aliases_map util/pmu.c:778 #3 0x56332c792ce9 in __test__pmu_event_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:295 #4 0x56332c792ce9 in test_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:367 #5 0x56332c76a09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #6 0x56332c76a09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #7 0x56332c76ce69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695 #8 0x56332c76ce69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #9 0x56332c7d2214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #10 0x56332c6701a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #11 0x56332c6701a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #12 0x56332c6701a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #13 0x7feefb359cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: 956a783 ("perf test: Test pmu-events aliases") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
[ Upstream commit b12eea5 ] The evsel->unit borrows a pointer of pmu event or alias instead of owns a string. But tool event (duration_time) passes a result of strdup() caused a leak. It was found by ASAN during metric test: Direct leak of 210 byte(s) in 70 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fe366fca0b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5) #1 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in add_event_tool util/parse-events.c:414 #2 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in parse_events_add_tool util/parse-events.c:1414 #3 0x559fbbd8474d in parse_events_parse util/parse-events.y:439 #4 0x559fbbcc95da in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:2096 #5 0x559fbbcc95da in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2141 #6 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:406 #7 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:393 #8 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_cpu tests/pmu-events.c:415 #9 0x559fbbc28555 in test_parsing tests/pmu-events.c:498 #10 0x559fbbc0109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #11 0x559fbbc0109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #12 0x559fbbc03e69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695 #13 0x559fbbc03e69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #14 0x559fbbc691f4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #15 0x559fbbb071a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #16 0x559fbbb071a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #17 0x559fbbb071a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #18 0x7fe366b68cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: f0fbb11 ("perf stat: Implement duration_time as a proper event") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
[ Upstream commit d26383d ] The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 #8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
[ Upstream commit 8a39e8c ] When compiling with DEBUG=1 on Fedora 32 I'm getting crash for 'perf test signal': Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () #1 0x00000000004d62e9 in test_function () at tests/bp_signal.c:61 #2 0x00000000004d689a in test__bp_signal (test=0xa8e280 <generic_ ... #3 0x00000000004b7d49 in run_test (test=0xa8e280 <generic_tests+1 ... #4 0x00000000004b7e7f in test_and_print (t=0xa8e280 <generic_test ... #5 0x00000000004b8927 in __cmd_test (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdce0, ... ... It's caused by the symbol __test_function being in the ".bss" section: $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [28] .bss NOBITS 0000000000c356a0 008346a0 00000000000511f8 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 32 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 0000000000c68548 B __test_function I guess most of the time we're just lucky the inline asm ended up in the ".text" section, so making it specific explicit with push and pop section clauses. $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [13] .text PROGBITS 0000000000431240 00031240 0000000000306faa 0000000000000000 AX 0 0 16 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 00000000004d62c8 T __test_function Committer testing: $ readelf -wi ~/bin/perf | grep producer -m1 <c> DW_AT_producer : (indirect string, offset: 0x254a): GNU C99 10.2.1 20200723 (Red Hat 10.2.1-1) -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -ggdb3 -std=gnu99 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fstack-protector-all ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ $ Before: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : FAILED! $ After: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : Ok $ Fixes: 8fd34e1 ("perf test: Improve bp_signal") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Petlan <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
[ Upstream commit b12eea5 ] The evsel->unit borrows a pointer of pmu event or alias instead of owns a string. But tool event (duration_time) passes a result of strdup() caused a leak. It was found by ASAN during metric test: Direct leak of 210 byte(s) in 70 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fe366fca0b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5) #1 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in add_event_tool util/parse-events.c:414 #2 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in parse_events_add_tool util/parse-events.c:1414 #3 0x559fbbd8474d in parse_events_parse util/parse-events.y:439 #4 0x559fbbcc95da in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:2096 #5 0x559fbbcc95da in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2141 #6 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:406 #7 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:393 #8 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_cpu tests/pmu-events.c:415 #9 0x559fbbc28555 in test_parsing tests/pmu-events.c:498 #10 0x559fbbc0109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #11 0x559fbbc0109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #12 0x559fbbc03e69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695 #13 0x559fbbc03e69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #14 0x559fbbc691f4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #15 0x559fbbb071a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #16 0x559fbbb071a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #17 0x559fbbb071a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #18 0x7fe366b68cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: f0fbb11 ("perf stat: Implement duration_time as a proper event") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
[ Upstream commit d26383d ] The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 #8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2020
[ Upstream commit 266150c ] Realloc of size zero is a free not an error, avoid this causing a double free. Caught by clang's address sanitizer: ==2634==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: attempting double-free on 0x6020000015f0 in thread T0: #0 0x5649659297fd in free llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:123:3 #1 0x5649659e9251 in __zfree tools/lib/zalloc.c:13:2 #2 0x564965c0f92c in mem2node__exit tools/perf/util/mem2node.c:114:2 #3 0x564965a08b4c in perf_c2c__report tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c:2867:2 #4 0x564965a0616a in cmd_c2c tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c:2989:10 #5 0x564965944348 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:312:11 #6 0x564965943235 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:364:8 #7 0x5649659440c4 in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:408:2 #8 0x564965942e41 in main tools/perf/perf.c:538:3 0x6020000015f0 is located 0 bytes inside of 1-byte region [0x6020000015f0,0x6020000015f1) freed by thread T0 here: #0 0x564965929da3 in realloc third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:164:3 #1 0x564965c0f55e in mem2node__init tools/perf/util/mem2node.c:97:16 #2 0x564965a08956 in perf_c2c__report tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c:2803:8 #3 0x564965a0616a in cmd_c2c tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c:2989:10 #4 0x564965944348 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:312:11 #5 0x564965943235 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:364:8 #6 0x5649659440c4 in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:408:2 #7 0x564965942e41 in main tools/perf/perf.c:538:3 previously allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x564965929c42 in calloc third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154:3 #1 0x5649659e9220 in zalloc tools/lib/zalloc.c:8:9 #2 0x564965c0f32d in mem2node__init tools/perf/util/mem2node.c:61:12 #3 0x564965a08956 in perf_c2c__report tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c:2803:8 #4 0x564965a0616a in cmd_c2c tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c:2989:10 #5 0x564965944348 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:312:11 #6 0x564965943235 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:364:8 #7 0x5649659440c4 in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:408:2 #8 0x564965942e41 in main tools/perf/perf.c:538:3 v2: add a WARN_ON_ONCE when the free condition arises. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2020
[ Upstream commit a466c85 ] When closing and freeing the source device we could end up doing our final blkdev_put() on the bdev, which will grab the bd_mutex. As such we want to be holding as few locks as possible, so move this call outside of the dev_replace->lock_finishing_cancel_unmount lock. Since we're modifying the fs_devices we need to make sure we're holding the uuid_mutex here, so take that as well. There's a report from syzbot probably hitting one of the cases where the bd_mutex and device_list_mutex are taken in the wrong order, however it's not with device replace, like this patch fixes. As there's no reproducer available so far, we can't verify the fix. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=84a0634dc5d21d488419 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.0/6878 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88804c17d780 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x281/0xf90 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5255 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2f3/0x700 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2109 __btrfs_end_transaction+0xf5/0x690 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:916 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3807 [inline] find_free_extent+0x23b7/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline] wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294 -> #3 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x234/0x470 fs/super.c:1672 sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1690 [inline] start_transaction+0xbe7/0x1170 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:624 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3789 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25e1/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline] wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294 -> #2 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x60e/0xac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3041 wb_shutdown+0x180/0x220 mm/backing-dev.c:355 bdi_unregister+0x174/0x590 mm/backing-dev.c:872 del_gendisk+0x820/0xa10 block/genhd.c:933 loop_remove drivers/block/loop.c:2192 [inline] loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2291 [inline] loop_control_ioctl+0x3b1/0x480 drivers/block/loop.c:2257 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 lo_open+0x19/0xd0 drivers/block/loop.c:1893 __blkdev_get+0x759/0x1aa0 fs/block_dev.c:1507 blkdev_get fs/block_dev.c:1639 [inline] blkdev_open+0x227/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1753 do_dentry_open+0x4b9/0x11b0 fs/open.c:817 do_open fs/namei.c:3251 [inline] path_openat+0x1b9a/0x2730 fs/namei.c:3368 do_filp_open+0x17e/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3395 do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1168 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1184 [inline] __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1192 [inline] __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1188 [inline] __x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1188 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline] btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline] btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline] close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161 close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline] btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179 close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149 generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464 kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108 btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265 deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &bdev->bd_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by syz-executor.0/6878: #0: ffff88809070c0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#70){++++}-{3:3}, at: deactivate_super+0xa5/0xd0 fs/super.c:365 #1: ffffffff8a5b37a8 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_close_devices+0x23/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1178 #2: ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 6878 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118 check_noncircular+0x324/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1827 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline] btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline] btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline] close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161 close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline] btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179 close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149 generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464 kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108 btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265 deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x460027 RSP: 002b:00007fff59216328 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000076035 RCX: 0000000000460027 RDX: 0000000000403188 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fff592163d0 RBP: 0000000000000333 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000b R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff59217460 R13: 0000000002df2a60 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff59217460 Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> [ add syzbot reference ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit 6617dfd ] Commit 4fc427e ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index") tried to fix the issue where seq_file pos is not increased if a NULL element is returned with seq_ops->next(). See bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 The commit effectively does: - increase pos for all seq_ops->start() - increase pos for all seq_ops->next() For ipv6_route, increasing pos for all seq_ops->next() is correct. But increasing pos for seq_ops->start() is not correct since pos is used to determine how many items to skip during seq_ops->start(): iter->skip = *pos; seq_ops->start() just fetches the *current* pos item. The item can be skipped only after seq_ops->show() which essentially is the beginning of seq_ops->next(). For example, I have 7 ipv6 route entries, root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next dd if=/proc/net/ipv6_route bs=4096 00000000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000400 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000003 00000000 80200001 lo fe800000000000002050e3fffebd3be8 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001 eth0 ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000004 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 0+1 records in 0+1 records out 1050 bytes (1.0 kB, 1.0 KiB) copied, 0.00707908 s, 148 kB/s root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next In the above, I specify buffer size 4096, so all records can be returned to user space with a single trip to the kernel. If I use buffer size 128, since each record size is 149, internally kernel seq_read() will read 149 into its internal buffer and return the data to user space in two read() syscalls. Then user read() syscall will trigger next seq_ops->start(). Since the current implementation increased pos even for seq_ops->start(), it will skip record #2, #4 and #6, assuming the first record is #1. root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next dd if=/proc/net/ipv6_route bs=128 00000000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000400 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo fe800000000000002050e3fffebd3be8 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 4+1 records in 4+1 records out 600 bytes copied, 0.00127758 s, 470 kB/s To fix the problem, create a fake pos pointer so seq_ops->start() won't actually increase seq_file pos. With this fix, the above `dd` command with `bs=128` will show correct result. Fixes: 4fc427e ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index") Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Vasily Averin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vasily Averin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit 71a174b ] b6da31b "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit e5e179a ] At memory hot-remove time we can retrieve an LMB's nid from its corresponding memory_block. There is no need to store the nid in multiple locations. Note that lmb_to_memblock() uses find_memory_block() to get the corresponding memory_block. As find_memory_block() runs in sub-linear time this approach is negligibly slower than what we do at present. In exchange for this lookup at hot-remove time we no longer need to call memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() during drmem_init() for each LMB. On powerpc, memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() is a linear search, so this spares us an O(n^2) initialization during boot. On systems with many LMBs that initialization overhead is palpable and disruptive. For example, on a box with 249854 LMBs we're seeing drmem_init() take upwards of 30 seconds to complete: [ 53.721639] drmem: initializing drmem v2 [ 80.604346] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#65 stuck for 23s! [swapper/0:1] [ 80.604377] Modules linked in: [ 80.604389] CPU: 65 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2+ #4 [ 80.604397] NIP: c0000000000a4980 LR: c0000000000a4940 CTR: 0000000000000000 [ 80.604407] REGS: c0002dbff8493830 TRAP: 0901 Not tainted (5.6.0-rc2+) [ 80.604412] MSR: 8000000002009033 <SF,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 44000248 XER: 0000000d [ 80.604431] CFAR: c0000000000a4a38 IRQMASK: 0 [ 80.604431] GPR00: c0000000000a4940 c0002dbff8493ac0 c000000001904400 c0003cfffffede30 [ 80.604431] GPR04: 0000000000000000 c000000000f4095a 000000000000002f 0000000010000000 [ 80.604431] GPR08: c0000bf7ecdb7fb8 c0000bf7ecc2d3c8 0000000000000008 c00c0002fdfb2001 [ 80.604431] GPR12: 0000000000000000 c00000001e8ec200 [ 80.604477] NIP [c0000000000a4980] hot_add_scn_to_nid+0xa0/0x3e0 [ 80.604486] LR [c0000000000a4940] hot_add_scn_to_nid+0x60/0x3e0 [ 80.604492] Call Trace: [ 80.604498] [c0002dbff8493ac0] [c0000000000a4940] hot_add_scn_to_nid+0x60/0x3e0 (unreliable) [ 80.604509] [c0002dbff8493b20] [c000000000087c10] memory_add_physaddr_to_nid+0x20/0x60 [ 80.604521] [c0002dbff8493b40] [c0000000010d4880] drmem_init+0x25c/0x2f0 [ 80.604530] [c0002dbff8493c10] [c000000000010154] do_one_initcall+0x64/0x2c0 [ 80.604540] [c0002dbff8493ce0] [c0000000010c4aa0] kernel_init_freeable+0x2d8/0x3a0 [ 80.604550] [c0002dbff8493db0] [c000000000010824] kernel_init+0x2c/0x148 [ 80.604560] [c0002dbff8493e20] [c00000000000b648] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74 [ 80.604567] Instruction dump: [ 80.604574] 392918e8 e9490000 e90a000a e92a0000 80ea000c 1d080018 3908ffe8 7d094214 [ 80.604586] 7fa94040 419d00dc e9490010 714a0088 <2faa0008> 409e00ac e9490000 7fbe5040 [ 89.047390] drmem: 249854 LMB(s) With a patched kernel on the same machine we're no longer seeing the soft lockup. drmem_init() now completes in negligible time, even when the LMB count is large. Fixes: b2d3b5e ("powerpc/pseries: Track LMB nid instead of using device tree") Signed-off-by: Scott Cheloha <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2020
…vents [ Upstream commit bef69bd ] It was reported that 'perf stat' crashed when using with armv8_pmu (CPU) events with the task mode. As 'perf stat' uses an empty cpu map for task mode but armv8_pmu has its own cpu mask, it has confused which map it should use when accessing file descriptors and this causes segfaults: (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000603fc8 in perf_evsel__close_fd_cpu (evsel=<optimized out>, cpu=<optimized out>) at evsel.c:122 #1 perf_evsel__close_cpu (evsel=evsel@entry=0x716e950, cpu=7) at evsel.c:156 #2 0x00000000004d4718 in evlist__close (evlist=0x70a7cb0) at util/evlist.c:1242 #3 0x0000000000453404 in __run_perf_stat (argc=3, argc@entry=1, argv=0x30, argv@entry=0xfffffaea2f90, run_idx=119, run_idx@entry=1701998435) at builtin-stat.c:929 #4 0x0000000000455058 in run_perf_stat (run_idx=1701998435, argv=0xfffffaea2f90, argc=1) at builtin-stat.c:947 #5 cmd_stat (argc=1, argv=0xfffffaea2f90) at builtin-stat.c:2357 #6 0x00000000004bb888 in run_builtin (p=p@entry=0x9764b8 <commands+288>, argc=argc@entry=4, argv=argv@entry=0xfffffaea2f90) at perf.c:312 #7 0x00000000004bbb54 in handle_internal_command (argc=argc@entry=4, argv=argv@entry=0xfffffaea2f90) at perf.c:364 #8 0x0000000000435378 in run_argv (argcp=<synthetic pointer>, argv=<synthetic pointer>) at perf.c:408 #9 main (argc=4, argv=0xfffffaea2f90) at perf.c:538 To fix this, I simply used the given cpu map unless the evsel actually is not a system-wide event (like uncore events). Fixes: 7736627 ("perf stat: Use affinity for closing file descriptors") Reported-by: Wei Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Tested-by: Barry Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit 6617dfd ] Commit 4fc427e ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index") tried to fix the issue where seq_file pos is not increased if a NULL element is returned with seq_ops->next(). See bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 The commit effectively does: - increase pos for all seq_ops->start() - increase pos for all seq_ops->next() For ipv6_route, increasing pos for all seq_ops->next() is correct. But increasing pos for seq_ops->start() is not correct since pos is used to determine how many items to skip during seq_ops->start(): iter->skip = *pos; seq_ops->start() just fetches the *current* pos item. The item can be skipped only after seq_ops->show() which essentially is the beginning of seq_ops->next(). For example, I have 7 ipv6 route entries, root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next dd if=/proc/net/ipv6_route bs=4096 00000000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000400 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 fe800000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 00000000000000000000000000000001 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000003 00000000 80200001 lo fe800000000000002050e3fffebd3be8 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001 eth0 ff000000000000000000000000000000 08 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000100 00000004 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 0+1 records in 0+1 records out 1050 bytes (1.0 kB, 1.0 KiB) copied, 0.00707908 s, 148 kB/s root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next In the above, I specify buffer size 4096, so all records can be returned to user space with a single trip to the kernel. If I use buffer size 128, since each record size is 149, internally kernel seq_read() will read 149 into its internal buffer and return the data to user space in two read() syscalls. Then user read() syscall will trigger next seq_ops->start(). Since the current implementation increased pos even for seq_ops->start(), it will skip record #2, #4 and #6, assuming the first record is #1. root@arch-fb-vm1:~/net-next dd if=/proc/net/ipv6_route bs=128 00000000000000000000000000000000 40 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000400 00000001 00000000 00000001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo fe800000000000002050e3fffebd3be8 80 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000002 00000000 80200001 eth0 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 00 00000000000000000000000000000000 ffffffff 00000001 00000000 00200200 lo 4+1 records in 4+1 records out 600 bytes copied, 0.00127758 s, 470 kB/s To fix the problem, create a fake pos pointer so seq_ops->start() won't actually increase seq_file pos. With this fix, the above `dd` command with `bs=128` will show correct result. Fixes: 4fc427e ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index") Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Vasily Averin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vasily Averin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit 71a174b ] b6da31b "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> #3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> #2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> #1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] #1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] #2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] #3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] #4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ #3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit e5e179a ] At memory hot-remove time we can retrieve an LMB's nid from its corresponding memory_block. There is no need to store the nid in multiple locations. Note that lmb_to_memblock() uses find_memory_block() to get the corresponding memory_block. As find_memory_block() runs in sub-linear time this approach is negligibly slower than what we do at present. In exchange for this lookup at hot-remove time we no longer need to call memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() during drmem_init() for each LMB. On powerpc, memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() is a linear search, so this spares us an O(n^2) initialization during boot. On systems with many LMBs that initialization overhead is palpable and disruptive. For example, on a box with 249854 LMBs we're seeing drmem_init() take upwards of 30 seconds to complete: [ 53.721639] drmem: initializing drmem v2 [ 80.604346] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#65 stuck for 23s! [swapper/0:1] [ 80.604377] Modules linked in: [ 80.604389] CPU: 65 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2+ #4 [ 80.604397] NIP: c0000000000a4980 LR: c0000000000a4940 CTR: 0000000000000000 [ 80.604407] REGS: c0002dbff8493830 TRAP: 0901 Not tainted (5.6.0-rc2+) [ 80.604412] MSR: 8000000002009033 <SF,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 44000248 XER: 0000000d [ 80.604431] CFAR: c0000000000a4a38 IRQMASK: 0 [ 80.604431] GPR00: c0000000000a4940 c0002dbff8493ac0 c000000001904400 c0003cfffffede30 [ 80.604431] GPR04: 0000000000000000 c000000000f4095a 000000000000002f 0000000010000000 [ 80.604431] GPR08: c0000bf7ecdb7fb8 c0000bf7ecc2d3c8 0000000000000008 c00c0002fdfb2001 [ 80.604431] GPR12: 0000000000000000 c00000001e8ec200 [ 80.604477] NIP [c0000000000a4980] hot_add_scn_to_nid+0xa0/0x3e0 [ 80.604486] LR [c0000000000a4940] hot_add_scn_to_nid+0x60/0x3e0 [ 80.604492] Call Trace: [ 80.604498] [c0002dbff8493ac0] [c0000000000a4940] hot_add_scn_to_nid+0x60/0x3e0 (unreliable) [ 80.604509] [c0002dbff8493b20] [c000000000087c10] memory_add_physaddr_to_nid+0x20/0x60 [ 80.604521] [c0002dbff8493b40] [c0000000010d4880] drmem_init+0x25c/0x2f0 [ 80.604530] [c0002dbff8493c10] [c000000000010154] do_one_initcall+0x64/0x2c0 [ 80.604540] [c0002dbff8493ce0] [c0000000010c4aa0] kernel_init_freeable+0x2d8/0x3a0 [ 80.604550] [c0002dbff8493db0] [c000000000010824] kernel_init+0x2c/0x148 [ 80.604560] [c0002dbff8493e20] [c00000000000b648] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74 [ 80.604567] Instruction dump: [ 80.604574] 392918e8 e9490000 e90a000a e92a0000 80ea000c 1d080018 3908ffe8 7d094214 [ 80.604586] 7fa94040 419d00dc e9490010 714a0088 <2faa0008> 409e00ac e9490000 7fbe5040 [ 89.047390] drmem: 249854 LMB(s) With a patched kernel on the same machine we're no longer seeing the soft lockup. drmem_init() now completes in negligible time, even when the LMB count is large. Fixes: b2d3b5e ("powerpc/pseries: Track LMB nid instead of using device tree") Signed-off-by: Scott Cheloha <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2020
commit 66d204a upstream. Very sporadically I had test case btrfs/069 from fstests hanging (for years, it is not a recent regression), with the following traces in dmesg/syslog: [162301.160628] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started [162301.181196] BTRFS info (device sdc): scrub: finished on devid 4 with status: 0 [162301.287162] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg finished [162513.513792] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1356167 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.514318] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.514522] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.514747] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid:1356167 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [162513.514751] Call Trace: [162513.514761] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.514765] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.514771] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.514844] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.514850] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.514864] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.514879] transaction_kthread+0xa4/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.514891] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x660/0x660 [btrfs] [162513.514894] kthread+0x153/0x170 [162513.514897] ? kthread_stop+0x2c0/0x2c0 [162513.514902] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [162513.514916] INFO: task fsstress:1356184 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.515192] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.515431] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.515680] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356184 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.515682] Call Trace: [162513.515688] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.515691] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.515697] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.515712] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.515716] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.515729] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.515743] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.515753] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.515758] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.515761] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.515765] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.515768] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.515771] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.515774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.515781] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.515782] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.515784] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.515786] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.515788] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 000000000daf0e74 RDI: 000000000000003a [162513.515789] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.515791] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000000003a [162513.515792] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.515804] INFO: task fsstress:1356185 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.516064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.516329] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.516617] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356185 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.516620] Call Trace: [162513.516625] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.516628] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.516634] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.516647] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.516650] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.516662] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.516679] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x3c/0x100 [btrfs] [162513.516686] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 [162513.516691] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 [162513.516697] vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 [162513.516703] setxattr+0x125/0x240 [162513.516709] ? lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480 [162513.516712] ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.516721] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0 [162513.516723] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516725] ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290 [162513.516727] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516732] path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 [162513.516739] __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 [162513.516741] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.516743] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.516745] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f56d5a [162513.516746] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.516748] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97868 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc [162513.516750] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f5238f56d5a [162513.516751] RDX: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 RSI: 00007fff67b978a0 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.516753] RBP: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff67b97700 [162513.516754] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 [162513.516756] R13: 0000000000000024 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fff67b978a0 [162513.516767] INFO: task fsstress:1356196 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.517064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.517365] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.517763] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356196 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.517780] Call Trace: [162513.517786] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.517789] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.517796] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.517810] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.517814] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.517829] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.517845] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.517857] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.517862] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.517865] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.517869] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.517872] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.517875] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.517878] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.517881] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.517883] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.517885] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.517887] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.517889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000007660add2 RDI: 0000000000000053 [162513.517891] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000000000000067 R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.517893] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000053 [162513.517895] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.517908] INFO: task fsstress:1356197 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.518298] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.518672] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.519157] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356197 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.519160] Call Trace: [162513.519165] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.519168] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.519174] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.519190] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.519193] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.519206] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.519222] btrfs_create+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [162513.519230] lookup_open+0x522/0x650 [162513.519246] path_openat+0x2b8/0xa50 [162513.519270] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 [162513.519275] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.519280] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.519285] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [162513.519287] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [162513.519295] do_sys_openat2+0x20d/0x2d0 [162513.519300] do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 [162513.519304] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.519307] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.519309] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f4a903 [162513.519310] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.519312] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 [162513.519314] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007f5238f4a903 [162513.519316] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001b6 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.519317] RBP: 00007fff67b978c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000002 [162513.519319] R10: 00007fff67b974f7 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000013 [162513.519320] R13: 00000000000001b6 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1c620 [162513.519332] INFO: task btrfs:1356211 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.519727] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.520115] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.520508] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid:1356211 ppid:1356178 flags:0x00004002 [162513.520511] Call Trace: [162513.520516] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.520519] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.520525] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.520544] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x11f/0x180 [btrfs] [162513.520548] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.520562] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45a/0xc30 [btrfs] [162513.520574] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520596] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6d8/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520619] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold+0x1cc/0x1fd [btrfs] [162513.520639] btrfs_ioctl+0x2a25/0x36f0 [btrfs] [162513.520643] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520645] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.520648] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520651] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.520655] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [162513.520657] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [162513.520660] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x35/0x50 [162513.520662] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520671] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520672] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520677] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.520679] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.520681] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3cd307d87 [162513.520682] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.520684] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30a56bb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [162513.520686] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fc3cd307d87 [162513.520687] RDX: 00007ffe30a57a30 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003 [162513.520689] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [162513.520690] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [162513.520692] R13: 0000557323a212e0 R14: 00007ffe30a5a520 R15: 0000000000000001 [162513.520703] Showing all locks held in the system: [162513.520712] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54: [162513.520713] #0: ffffffffb40a91a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x197 [162513.520728] 1 lock held by in:imklog/596: [162513.520729] #0: ffff8f3f0d781400 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 [162513.520782] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/1356167: [162513.520784] #0: ffff8f3d810cc848 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0x4a/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.520798] 1 lock held by btrfs/1356190: [162513.520800] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0x60 [162513.520805] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356184: [162513.520806] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520811] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356185: [162513.520812] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520815] #1: ffff8f3d80a650b8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x50/0x120 [162513.520820] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520833] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356196: [162513.520834] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520838] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356197: [162513.520839] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520843] #1: ffff8f3d506465e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x2a7/0xa50 [162513.520846] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520858] 2 locks held by btrfs/1356211: [162513.520859] #0: ffff8f3d810cde30 (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x52/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520877] #1: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] This was weird because the stack traces show that a transaction commit, triggered by a device replace operation, is blocking trying to pause any running scrubs but there are no stack traces of blocked tasks doing a scrub. After poking around with drgn, I noticed there was a scrub task that was constantly running and blocking for shorts periods of time: >>> t = find_task(prog, 1356190) >>> prog.stack_trace(t) #0 __schedule+0x5ce/0xcfc #1 schedule+0x46/0xe4 #2 schedule_timeout+0x1df/0x475 #3 btrfs_reada_wait+0xda/0x132 #4 scrub_stripe+0x2a8/0x112f #5 scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x134 #6 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x29e/0x5ee #7 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2d5/0x91b #8 btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36e7 #9 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 #10 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x77 #11 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x156 Which corresponds to: int btrfs_reada_wait(void *handle) { struct reada_control *rc = handle; struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rc->fs_info; while (atomic_read(&rc->elems)) { if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt)) reada_start_machine(fs_info); wait_event_timeout(rc->wait, atomic_read(&rc->elems) == 0, (HZ + 9) / 10); } (...) So the counter "rc->elems" was set to 1 and never decreased to 0, causing the scrub task to loop forever in that function. Then I used the following script for drgn to check the readahead requests: $ cat dump_reada.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) def dump_re(re): nzones = re.nzones.value_() print(f're at {hex(re.value_())}') print(f'\t logical {re.logical.value_()}') print(f'\t refcnt {re.refcnt.value_()}') print(f'\t nzones {nzones}') for i in range(nzones): dev = re.zones[i].device name = dev.name.str.string_() print(f'\t\t dev id {dev.devid.value_()} name {name}') print() for _, e in radix_tree_for_each(fs_info.reada_tree): re = cast('struct reada_extent *', e) dump_re(re) $ drgn dump_reada.py re at 0xffff8f3da9d25ad8 logical 38928384 refcnt 1 nzones 1 dev id 0 name b'/dev/sdd' $ So there was one readahead extent with a single zone corresponding to the source device of that last device replace operation logged in dmesg/syslog. Also the ID of that zone's device was 0 which is a special value set in the source device of a device replace operation when the operation finishes (constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID set at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()), confirming again that device /dev/sdd was the source of a device replace operation. Normally there should be as many zones in the readahead extent as there are devices, and I wasn't expecting the extent to be in a block group with a 'single' profile, so I went and confirmed with the following drgn script that there weren't any single profile block groups: $ cat dump_block_groups.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA = (1 << 0) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM = (1 << 1) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA = (1 << 2) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 = (1 << 3) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 = (1 << 4) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP = (1 << 5) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 = (1 << 6) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 = (1 << 7) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 = (1 << 8) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 = (1 << 9) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 = (1 << 10) def bg_flags_string(bg): flags = bg.flags.value_() ret = '' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA: ret = 'data' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'meta' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'system' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0: ret += ' raid0' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1: ret += ' raid1' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP: ret += ' dup' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10: ret += ' raid10' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5: ret += ' raid5' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6: ret += ' raid6' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3: ret += ' raid1c3' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4: ret += ' raid1c4' else: ret += ' single' return ret def dump_bg(bg): print() print(f'block group at {hex(bg.value_())}') print(f'\t start {bg.start.value_()} length {bg.length.value_()}') print(f'\t flags {bg.flags.value_()} - {bg_flags_string(bg)}') bg_root = fs_info.block_group_cache_tree.address_of_() for bg in rbtree_inorder_for_each_entry('struct btrfs_block_group', bg_root, 'cache_node'): dump_bg(bg) $ drgn dump_block_groups.py block group at 0xffff8f3d673b0400 start 22020096 length 16777216 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d53ddb400 start 38797312 length 536870912 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4d9c00 start 575668224 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d08189000 start 2723151872 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3db70ff000 start 2790260736 length 1073741824 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4dd800 start 3864002560 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d67037000 start 3931111424 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 $ So there were only 2 reasons left for having a readahead extent with a single zone: reada_find_zone(), called when creating a readahead extent, returned NULL either because we failed to find the corresponding block group or because a memory allocation failed. With some additional and custom tracing I figured out that on every further ocurrence of the problem the block group had just been deleted when we were looping to create the zones for the readahead extent (at reada_find_extent()), so we ended up with only one zone in the readahead extent, corresponding to a device that ends up getting replaced. So after figuring that out it became obvious why the hang happens: 1) Task A starts a scrub on any device of the filesystem, except for device /dev/sdd; 2) Task B starts a device replace with /dev/sdd as the source device; 3) Task A calls btrfs_reada_add() from scrub_stripe() and it is currently starting to scrub a stripe from block group X. This call to btrfs_reada_add() is the one for the extent tree. When btrfs_reada_add() calls reada_add_block(), it passes the logical address of the extent tree's root node as its 'logical' argument - a value of 38928384; 4) Task A then enters reada_find_extent(), called from reada_add_block(). It finds there isn't any existing readahead extent for the logical address 38928384, so it proceeds to the path of creating a new one. It calls btrfs_map_block() to find out which stripes exist for the block group X. On the first iteration of the for loop that iterates over the stripes, it finds the stripe for device /dev/sdd, so it creates one zone for that device and adds it to the readahead extent. Before getting into the second iteration of the loop, the cleanup kthread deletes block group X because it was empty. So in the iterations for the remaining stripes it does not add more zones to the readahead extent, because the calls to reada_find_zone() returned NULL because they couldn't find block group X anymore. As a result the new readahead extent has a single zone, corresponding to the device /dev/sdd; 4) Before task A returns to btrfs_reada_add() and queues the readahead job for the readahead work queue, task B finishes the device replace and at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() swaps the device /dev/sdd with the new device /dev/sdg; 5) Task A returns to reada_add_block(), which increments the counter "->elems" of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add(). Then it returns back to btrfs_reada_add() and calls reada_start_machine(). This queues a job in the readahead work queue to run the function reada_start_machine_worker(), which calls __reada_start_machine(). At __reada_start_machine() we take the device list mutex and for each device found in the current device list, we call reada_start_machine_dev() to start the readahead work. However at this point the device /dev/sdd was already freed and is not in the device list anymore. This means the corresponding readahead for the extent at 38928384 is never started, and therefore the "->elems" counter of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add() never goes down to 0, causing the call to btrfs_reada_wait(), done by the scrub task, to wait forever. Note that the readahead request can be made either after the device replace started or before it started, however in pratice it is very unlikely that a device replace is able to start after a readahead request is made and is able to complete before the readahead request completes - maybe only on a very small and nearly empty filesystem. This hang however is not the only problem we can have with readahead and device removals. When the readahead extent has other zones other than the one corresponding to the device that is being removed (either by a device replace or a device remove operation), we risk having a use-after-free on the device when dropping the last reference of the readahead extent. For example if we create a readahead extent with two zones, one for the device /dev/sdd and one for the device /dev/sde: 1) Before the readahead worker starts, the device /dev/sdd is removed, and the corresponding btrfs_device structure is freed. However the readahead extent still has the zone pointing to the device structure; 2) When the readahead worker starts, it only finds device /dev/sde in the current device list of the filesystem; 3) It starts the readahead work, at reada_start_machine_dev(), using the device /dev/sde; 4) Then when it finishes reading the extent from device /dev/sde, it calls __readahead_hook() which ends up dropping the last reference on the readahead extent through the last call to reada_extent_put(); 5) At reada_extent_put() it iterates over each zone of the readahead extent and attempts to delete an element from the device's 'reada_extents' radix tree, resulting in a use-after-free, as the device pointer of the zone for /dev/sdd is now stale. We can also access the device after dropping the last reference of a zone, through reada_zone_release(), also called by reada_extent_put(). And a device remove suffers the same problem, however since it shrinks the device size down to zero before removing the device, it is very unlikely to still have readahead requests not completed by the time we free the device, the only possibility is if the device has a very little space allocated. While the hang problem is exclusive to scrub, since it is currently the only user of btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_reada_wait(), the use-after-free problem affects any path that triggers readhead, which includes btree_readahead_hook() and __readahead_hook() (a readahead worker can trigger readahed for the children of a node) for example - any path that ends up calling reada_add_block() can trigger the use-after-free after a device is removed. So fix this by waiting for any readahead requests for a device to complete before removing a device, ensuring that while waiting for existing ones no new ones can be made. This problem has been around for a very long time - the readahead code was added in 2011, device remove exists since 2008 and device replace was introduced in 2013, hard to pick a specific commit for a git Fixes tag. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit ca10845 ] While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x: f3cd2c5: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: [email protected] # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2020
commit 6f117cb upstream. When requeueing all requests on the device request queue to the blocklayer we might get to an ERP (error recovery) request that is a copy of an original CQR. Those requests do not have blocklayer request information or a pointer to the dasd_queue set. When trying to access those data it will lead to a null pointer dereference in dasd_requeue_all_requests(). Fix by checking if the request is an ERP request that can simply be ignored. The blocklayer request will be requeued by the original CQR that is on the device queue right behind the ERP request. Fixes: 9487cfd ("s390/dasd: fix handling of internal requests") Cc: <[email protected]> #4.16 Signed-off-by: Stefan Haberland <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jan Hoeppner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit e773ca7 ] Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2020
[ Upstream commit a0faaa2 ] adapter->tx_scrq and adapter->rx_scrq could be NULL if the previous reset did not complete after freeing sub crqs. Check for NULL before dereferencing them. Snippet of call trace: ibmvnic 30000006 env6: Releasing sub-CRQ ibmvnic 30000006 env6: Releasing CRQ ... ibmvnic 30000006 env6: Got Control IP offload Response ibmvnic 30000006 env6: Re-setting tx_scrq[0] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000000 Faulting instruction address: 0xc008000003dea7cc Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 nft_compat nft_counter nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_tables xsk_diag tcp_diag udp_diag raw_diag inet_diag unix_diag af_packet_diag netlink_diag tun bridge stp llc rfkill sunrpc pseries_rng xts vmx_crypto uio_pdrv_genirq uio binfmt_misc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sd_mod t10_pi sg ibmvscsi ibmvnic ibmveth scsi_transport_srp dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod CPU: 80 PID: 1856 Comm: kworker/80:2 Tainted: G W 5.8.0+ #4 Workqueue: events __ibmvnic_reset [ibmvnic] NIP: c008000003dea7cc LR: c008000003dea7bc CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c0000007ef7db860 TRAP: 0380 Tainted: G W (5.8.0+) MSR: 800000000280b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28002422 XER: 0000000d CFAR: c000000000bd9520 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c008000003dea7bc c0000007ef7dbaf0 c008000003df7400 c0000007fa26ec00 GPR04: c0000007fcd0d008 c0000007fcd96350 0000000000000027 c0000007fcd0d010 GPR08: 0000000000000023 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR12: 0000000000002000 c00000001ec18e00 c0000000001982f8 c0000007bad6e840 GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 fffffffffffffef7 GPR24: 0000000000000402 c0000007fa26f3a8 0000000000000003 c00000016f8ec048 GPR28: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000007fa26ec00 NIP [c008000003dea7cc] ibmvnic_reset_init+0x15c/0x258 [ibmvnic] LR [c008000003dea7bc] ibmvnic_reset_init+0x14c/0x258 [ibmvnic] Call Trace: [c0000007ef7dbaf0] [c008000003dea7bc] ibmvnic_reset_init+0x14c/0x258 [ibmvnic] (unreliable) [c0000007ef7dbb80] [c008000003de8860] __ibmvnic_reset+0x408/0x970 [ibmvnic] [c0000007ef7dbc50] [c00000000018b7cc] process_one_work+0x2cc/0x800 [c0000007ef7dbd20] [c00000000018bd78] worker_thread+0x78/0x520 [c0000007ef7dbdb0] [c0000000001984c4] kthread+0x1d4/0x1e0 [c0000007ef7dbe20] [c00000000000cea8] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74 Fixes: 57a4943 ("ibmvnic: Reset sub-crqs during driver reset") Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2021
…st[] commit 6808965 upstream. of_match_node() calls __of_match_node() which loops though the entries of matches array. It stops when condition: (matches->name[0] || matches->type[0] || matches->compatible[0]) is false. Thus, add a null entry at the end of at91_soc_allowed_list[] array. Fixes: caab13b ("drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs") Cc: [email protected] #4.12+ Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2021
[ Upstream commit c1c3ba1 ] If dobj->control is not initialized we end up in an OOPs during skl_tplg_complete: [ 26.553358] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000078 [ 26.561151] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 26.566897] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 26.572642] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 26.575479] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 26.580158] CPU: 2 PID: 2082 Comm: udevd Tainted: G C 5.4.81 #4 [ 26.588232] Hardware name: HP Soraka/Soraka, BIOS Google_Soraka.10431.106.0 12/03/2019 [ 26.597082] RIP: 0010:skl_tplg_complete+0x70/0x144 [snd_soc_skl] Fixes: 2d744ec ("ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Automatic DMIC format configuration according to information from NHL") Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski <[email protected]> Tested-by: Lukasz Majczak <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2021
The two commits below add up to a cpuset might_sleep() splat for RT: 8447a0f cpuset: convert callback_mutex to a spinlock 344736f cpuset: simplify cpuset_node_allowed API BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:995 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 11718, name: cset CPU: 135 PID: 11718 Comm: cset Tainted: G E 4.10.0-rt1-rt #4 Hardware name: Intel Corporation BRICKLAND/BRICKLAND, BIOS BRHSXSD1.86B.0056.R01.1409242327 09/24/2014 Call Trace: ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81 ? ___might_sleep+0xf4/0x170 ? rt_spin_lock+0x1c/0x50 ? __cpuset_node_allowed+0x66/0xc0 ? ___slab_alloc+0x390/0x570 <disables IRQs> ? anon_vma_fork+0x8f/0x140 ? copy_page_range+0x6cf/0xb00 ? anon_vma_fork+0x8f/0x140 ? __slab_alloc.isra.74+0x5a/0x81 ? anon_vma_fork+0x8f/0x140 ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b5/0x1f0 ? anon_vma_fork+0x8f/0x140 ? copy_process.part.35+0x1670/0x1ee0 ? _do_fork+0xdd/0x3f0 ? _do_fork+0xdd/0x3f0 ? do_syscall_64+0x61/0x170 ? entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 The later ensured that a NUMA box WILL take callback_lock in atomic context by removing the allocator and reclaim path __GFP_HARDWALL usage which prevented such contexts from taking callback_mutex. One option would be to reinstate __GFP_HARDWALL protections for RT, however, as the 8447a0f changelog states: The callback_mutex is only used to synchronize reads/updates of cpusets' flags and cpu/node masks. These operations should always proceed fast so there's no reason why we can't use a spinlock instead of the mutex. Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2021
[ Upstream commit 7f9942c ] Building with the clang integrated assembler produces a couple of errors for the s3c24xx fiq support: arch/arm/mach-s3c/irq-s3c24xx-fiq.S:52:2: error: instruction 'subne' can not set flags, but 's' suffix specified subnes pc, lr, #4 @@ return, still have work to do arch/arm/mach-s3c/irq-s3c24xx-fiq.S:64:1: error: invalid symbol redefinition s3c24xx_spi_fiq_txrx: There are apparently two problems: one with extraneous or duplicate labels, and one with old-style opcode mnemonics. Stefan Agner has previously fixed other problems like this, but missed this particular file. Fixes: bec0806 ("spi_s3c24xx: add FIQ pseudo-DMA support") Cc: Stefan Agner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2021
[ Upstream commit c5c97ca ] The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the array after it. The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data. 27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment 0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ #0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13 #1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8 #2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9 #3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9 #4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9 #5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4 #6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9 #7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11 #8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8 #9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2 #10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3 #11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc) #12 0x561532596828 in _start ... SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2021
[ Upstream commit 7f9942c ] Building with the clang integrated assembler produces a couple of errors for the s3c24xx fiq support: arch/arm/mach-s3c/irq-s3c24xx-fiq.S:52:2: error: instruction 'subne' can not set flags, but 's' suffix specified subnes pc, lr, #4 @@ return, still have work to do arch/arm/mach-s3c/irq-s3c24xx-fiq.S:64:1: error: invalid symbol redefinition s3c24xx_spi_fiq_txrx: There are apparently two problems: one with extraneous or duplicate labels, and one with old-style opcode mnemonics. Stefan Agner has previously fixed other problems like this, but missed this particular file. Fixes: bec0806 ("spi_s3c24xx: add FIQ pseudo-DMA support") Cc: Stefan Agner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2021
[ Upstream commit c5c97ca ] The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the array after it. The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data. 27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment 0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ #0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13 #1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8 #2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9 #3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9 #4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9 #5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4 #6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9 #7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11 #8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8 #9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2 #10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3 #11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc) #12 0x561532596828 in _start ... SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2021
commit 4d14c5c upstream Calling btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata can result in flushing delalloc while holding a transaction and delayed node locks. This is deadlock prone. In the past multiple commits: * ae5e070 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't try to wait flushing if we're already holding a transaction") * 6f23277 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle") Tried to solve various aspects of this but this was always a whack-a-mole game. Unfortunately those 2 fixes don't solve a deadlock scenario involving btrfs_delayed_node::mutex. Namely, one thread can call btrfs_dirty_inode as a result of reading a file and modifying its atime: PID: 6963 TASK: ffff8c7f3f94c000 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "test" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffa52a1bdd #3 wait_for_completion at ffffffffa529eeea <-- sleeps with delayed node mutex held #4 start_delalloc_inodes at ffffffffc0380db5 #5 btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot at ffffffffc0393836 #6 try_flush_qgroup at ffffffffc03f04b2 #7 __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta at ffffffffc03f5bb6 <-- tries to reserve space and starts delalloc inodes. #8 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e31aa <-- acquires delayed node mutex #9 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 #10 btrfs_dirty_inode at ffffffffc038627b <-- TRANSACTIION OPENED #11 touch_atime at ffffffffa4cf0000 #12 generic_file_read_iter at ffffffffa4c1f123 #13 new_sync_read at ffffffffa4ccdc8a #14 vfs_read at ffffffffa4cd0849 #15 ksys_read at ffffffffa4cd0bd1 #16 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa4a052eb #17 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa540008c This will cause an asynchronous work to flush the delalloc inodes to happen which can try to acquire the same delayed_node mutex: PID: 455 TASK: ffff8c8085fa4000 CPU: 5 COMMAND: "kworker/u16:30" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa529e80a #3 __mutex_lock at ffffffffa529fdcb <-- goes to sleep, never wakes up. #4 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e3143 <-- tries to acquire the mutex #5 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 <-- this is the same inode that pid 6963 is holding #6 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.78 at ffffffffc0386be7 #7 cow_file_range at ffffffffc03879c1 #8 btrfs_run_delalloc_range at ffffffffc038894c #9 writepage_delalloc at ffffffffc03a3c8f #10 __extent_writepage at ffffffffc03a4c01 #11 extent_write_cache_pages at ffffffffc03a500b #12 extent_writepages at ffffffffc03a6de2 #13 do_writepages at ffffffffa4c277eb #14 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffa4c1e5bb #15 btrfs_run_delalloc_work at ffffffffc0380987 <-- starts running delayed nodes #16 normal_work_helper at ffffffffc03b706c #17 process_one_work at ffffffffa4aba4e4 #18 worker_thread at ffffffffa4aba6fd #19 kthread at ffffffffa4ac0a3d #20 ret_from_fork at ffffffffa54001ff To fully address those cases the complete fix is to never issue any flushing while holding the transaction or the delayed node lock. This patch achieves it by calling qgroup_reserve_meta directly which will either succeed without flushing or will fail and return -EDQUOT. In the latter case that return value is going to be propagated to btrfs_dirty_inode which will fallback to start a new transaction. That's fine as the majority of time we expect the inode will have BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY flag set which will result in directly copying the in-memory state. Fixes: c53e965 ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT") CC: [email protected] # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> [sudip: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2021
commit ac0bbf5 upstream. The digital input subdevice supports Comedi asynchronous commands that read interrupt status information. This uses 16-bit Comedi samples (of which only the bottom 8 bits contain status information). However, the interrupt handler is calling `comedi_buf_write_samples()` with the address of a 32-bit variable `unsigned int status`. On a bigendian machine, this will copy 2 bytes from the wrong end of the variable. Fix it by changing the type of the variable to `unsigned short`. Fixes: a8c66b6 ("staging: comedi: addi_apci_1500: rewrite the subdevice support functions") Cc: <[email protected]> #4.0+ Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2021
commit 90bd070 upstream. The following deadlock is detected: truncate -> setattr path is waiting for pending direct IO to be done (inode->i_dio_count become zero) with inode->i_rwsem held (down_write). PID: 14827 TASK: ffff881686a9af80 CPU: 20 COMMAND: "ora_p005_hrltd9" #0 __schedule at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule at ffffffff81866de6 #2 inode_dio_wait at ffffffff812a2d04 #3 ocfs2_setattr at ffffffffc05f322e [ocfs2] #4 notify_change at ffffffff812a5a09 #5 do_truncate at ffffffff812808f5 #6 do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.18 at ffffffff81280cf2 #7 sys_ftruncate at ffffffff81280d8e #8 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81003949 #9 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81a001ad dio completion path is going to complete one direct IO (decrement inode->i_dio_count), but before that it hung at locking inode->i_rwsem: #0 __schedule+700 at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule+54 at ffffffff81866de6 #2 rwsem_down_write_failed+536 at ffffffff8186aa28 #3 call_rwsem_down_write_failed+23 at ffffffff8185a1b7 #4 down_write+45 at ffffffff81869c9d #5 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write+180 at ffffffffc05d5444 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_dio_end_io+85 at ffffffffc05d5a85 [ocfs2] #7 dio_complete+140 at ffffffff812c873c #8 dio_aio_complete_work+25 at ffffffff812c89f9 #9 process_one_work+361 at ffffffff810b1889 #10 worker_thread+77 at ffffffff810b233d #11 kthread+261 at ffffffff810b7fd5 #12 ret_from_fork+62 at ffffffff81a0035e Thus above forms ABBA deadlock. The same deadlock was mentioned in upstream commit 28f5a8a ("ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()"). It seems that that commit only removed the cluster lock (the victim of above dead lock) from the ABBA deadlock party. End-user visible effects: Process hang in truncate -> ocfs2_setattr path and other processes hang at ocfs2_dio_end_io_write path. This is to fix the deadlock itself. It removes inode_lock() call from dio completion path to remove the deadlock and add ip_alloc_sem lock in setattr path to synchronize the inode modifications. [[email protected]: remove the "had_alloc_lock" as suggested] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Gang He <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2021
commit ac0bbf5 upstream. The digital input subdevice supports Comedi asynchronous commands that read interrupt status information. This uses 16-bit Comedi samples (of which only the bottom 8 bits contain status information). However, the interrupt handler is calling `comedi_buf_write_samples()` with the address of a 32-bit variable `unsigned int status`. On a bigendian machine, this will copy 2 bytes from the wrong end of the variable. Fix it by changing the type of the variable to `unsigned short`. Fixes: a8c66b6 ("staging: comedi: addi_apci_1500: rewrite the subdevice support functions") Cc: <[email protected]> #4.0+ Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2021
commit 90bd070 upstream. The following deadlock is detected: truncate -> setattr path is waiting for pending direct IO to be done (inode->i_dio_count become zero) with inode->i_rwsem held (down_write). PID: 14827 TASK: ffff881686a9af80 CPU: 20 COMMAND: "ora_p005_hrltd9" #0 __schedule at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule at ffffffff81866de6 #2 inode_dio_wait at ffffffff812a2d04 #3 ocfs2_setattr at ffffffffc05f322e [ocfs2] #4 notify_change at ffffffff812a5a09 #5 do_truncate at ffffffff812808f5 #6 do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.18 at ffffffff81280cf2 #7 sys_ftruncate at ffffffff81280d8e #8 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81003949 #9 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81a001ad dio completion path is going to complete one direct IO (decrement inode->i_dio_count), but before that it hung at locking inode->i_rwsem: #0 __schedule+700 at ffffffff818667cc #1 schedule+54 at ffffffff81866de6 #2 rwsem_down_write_failed+536 at ffffffff8186aa28 #3 call_rwsem_down_write_failed+23 at ffffffff8185a1b7 #4 down_write+45 at ffffffff81869c9d #5 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write+180 at ffffffffc05d5444 [ocfs2] #6 ocfs2_dio_end_io+85 at ffffffffc05d5a85 [ocfs2] #7 dio_complete+140 at ffffffff812c873c #8 dio_aio_complete_work+25 at ffffffff812c89f9 #9 process_one_work+361 at ffffffff810b1889 #10 worker_thread+77 at ffffffff810b233d #11 kthread+261 at ffffffff810b7fd5 #12 ret_from_fork+62 at ffffffff81a0035e Thus above forms ABBA deadlock. The same deadlock was mentioned in upstream commit 28f5a8a ("ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock in ocfs2_setattr()"). It seems that that commit only removed the cluster lock (the victim of above dead lock) from the ABBA deadlock party. End-user visible effects: Process hang in truncate -> ocfs2_setattr path and other processes hang at ocfs2_dio_end_io_write path. This is to fix the deadlock itself. It removes inode_lock() call from dio completion path to remove the deadlock and add ip_alloc_sem lock in setattr path to synchronize the inode modifications. [[email protected]: remove the "had_alloc_lock" as suggested] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Gang He <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit b5332a9 ] We are not changing anything in the TCP connection state so we should not take a write_lock but rather a read lock. This caused a deadlock when running nvmet-tcp and nvme-tcp on the same system, where state_change callbacks on the host and on the controller side have causal relationship and made lockdep report on this with blktests: ================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 5.12.0-rc3 #1 Tainted: G I -------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-R} usage. nvme/1324 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: ffff888363151000 (clock-AF_INET){++-?}-{2:2}, at: nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: __lock_acquire+0x79b/0x18d0 lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480 _raw_write_lock_bh+0x39/0x80 nvmet_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x170 [nvmet_tcp] tcp_fin+0x2a8/0x780 tcp_data_queue+0xf94/0x1f20 tcp_rcv_established+0x6ba/0x1f00 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x502/0x760 tcp_v4_rcv+0x257e/0x3430 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x69/0x6a0 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x1e2/0x2f0 ip_local_deliver+0x1a2/0x420 ip_rcv+0x4fb/0x6b0 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x162/0x1b0 process_backlog+0x1ff/0x770 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xa9/0x5c0 net_rx_action+0x7b3/0xb30 __do_softirq+0x1f0/0x940 do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xd8/0x100 ip_finish_output2+0x6b7/0x18a0 __ip_queue_xmit+0x706/0x1aa0 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2068/0x2e20 tcp_write_xmit+0xc9e/0x2bb0 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x92/0x310 inet_shutdown+0x158/0x300 __nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x36/0x270 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x87/0xb0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_teardown_admin_queue+0x69/0xe0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0x100/0x10c [nvme_core] nvme_sysfs_delete.cold+0x8/0xd [nvme_core] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c7/0x460 new_sync_write+0x36c/0x610 vfs_write+0x5c0/0x870 ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae irq event stamp: 10687 hardirqs last enabled at (10687): [<ffffffff9ec376bd>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40 hardirqs last disabled at (10686): [<ffffffff9ec374d8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x68/0x90 softirqs last enabled at (10684): [<ffffffff9f000608>] __do_softirq+0x608/0x940 softirqs last disabled at (10649): [<ffffffff9cdedd31>] do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(clock-AF_INET); <Interrupt> lock(clock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by nvme/1324: #0: ffff8884a01fe470 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0 #1: ffff8886e435c090 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x216/0x460 #2: ffff888104d90c38 (kn->active#255){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_remove_self+0x22d/0x330 #3: ffff8884634538d0 (&queue->queue_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x52/0xb0 [nvme_tcp] #4: ffff888363150d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: inet_shutdown+0x59/0x300 stack backtrace: CPU: 26 PID: 1324 Comm: nvme Tainted: G I 5.12.0-rc3 #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/06NR82, BIOS 2.10.0 11/12/2020 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x93/0xc2 mark_lock_irq.cold+0x2c/0xb3 ? verify_lock_unused+0x390/0x390 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x160/0x160 ? lock_downgrade+0x100/0x100 ? save_trace+0x88/0x5e0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40 mark_lock+0x530/0x1470 ? mark_lock_irq+0x1d10/0x1d10 ? enqueue_timer+0x660/0x660 mark_usage+0x215/0x2a0 __lock_acquire+0x79b/0x18d0 ? tcp_schedule_loss_probe.part.0+0x38c/0x520 lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480 ? nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40 ? tcp_mtu_probe+0x1ae0/0x1ae0 ? kmalloc_reserve+0xa0/0xa0 ? sysfs_file_ops+0x170/0x170 _raw_read_lock+0x3d/0xa0 ? nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp] ? sysfs_file_ops+0x170/0x170 inet_shutdown+0x189/0x300 __nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x36/0x270 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x87/0xb0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_tcp_teardown_admin_queue+0x69/0xe0 [nvme_tcp] nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0x100/0x10c [nvme_core] nvme_sysfs_delete.cold+0x8/0xd [nvme_core] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c7/0x460 new_sync_write+0x36c/0x610 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600 ? lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480 ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9a/0x110 vfs_write+0x5c0/0x870 ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0 ? __ia32_sys_read+0xa0/0xa0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x198/0x340 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Fixes: 872d26a ("nvmet-tcp: add NVMe over TCP target driver") Reported-by: Yi Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2021
[ Upstream commit bbd6f0a ] In bnxt_rx_pkt(), the RX buffers are expected to complete in order. If the RX consumer index indicates an out of order buffer completion, it means we are hitting a hardware bug and the driver will abort all remaining RX packets and reset the RX ring. The RX consumer index that we pass to bnxt_discard_rx() is not correct. We should be passing the current index (tmp_raw_cons) instead of the old index (raw_cons). This bug can cause us to be at the wrong index when trying to abort the next RX packet. It can crash like this: #0 [ffff9bbcdf5c39a8] machine_kexec at ffffffff9b05e007 #1 [ffff9bbcdf5c3a00] __crash_kexec at ffffffff9b111232 #2 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ad0] panic at ffffffff9b07d61e #3 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b50] oops_end at ffffffff9b030978 #4 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b78] no_context at ffffffff9b06aaf0 #5 [ffff9bbcdf5c3bd8] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06ae2e #6 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c28] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06af24 #7 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c38] __do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06b67e #8 [ffff9bbcdf5c3cb0] do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06bb12 #9 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ce0] page_fault at ffffffff9bc015c5 [exception RIP: bnxt_rx_pkt+237] RIP: ffffffffc0259cdd RSP: ffff9bbcdf5c3d98 RFLAGS: 00010213 RAX: 000000005dd8097f RBX: ffff9ba4cb11b7e0 RCX: ffffa923cf6e9000 RDX: 0000000000000fff RSI: 0000000000000627 RDI: 0000000000001000 RBP: ffff9bbcdf5c3e60 R8: 0000000000420003 R9: 000000000000020d R10: ffffa923cf6ec138 R11: ffff9bbcdf5c3e83 R12: ffff9ba4d6f928c0 R13: ffff9ba4cac28080 R14: ffff9ba4cb11b7f0 R15: ffff9ba4d5a30000 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 Fixes: a1b0e4e ("bnxt_en: Improve RX consumer index validity check.") Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2021
…xtent [ Upstream commit 6416954 ] When cloning an inline extent there are a few cases, such as when we have an implicit hole at file offset 0, where we start a transaction while holding a read lock on a leaf. Starting the transaction results in a call to sb_start_intwrite(), which results in doing a read lock on a percpu semaphore. Lockdep doesn't like this and complains about it: [46.580704] ====================================================== [46.580752] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [46.580799] 5.13.0-rc1 #28 Not tainted [46.580832] ------------------------------------------------------ [46.580877] cloner/3835 is trying to acquire lock: [46.580918] c00000001301d638 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.581167] [46.581167] but task is already holding lock: [46.581217] c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581293] [46.581293] which lock already depends on the new lock. [46.581293] [46.581351] [46.581351] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [46.581410] [46.581410] -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [46.581464] down_read_nested+0x68/0x200 [46.581536] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581577] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x88/0x200 [46.581623] btrfs_search_slot+0x298/0xb70 [46.581665] btrfs_set_inode_index+0xfc/0x260 [46.581708] btrfs_new_inode+0x26c/0x950 [46.581749] btrfs_create+0xf4/0x2b0 [46.581782] lookup_open.isra.57+0x55c/0x6a0 [46.581855] path_openat+0x418/0xd20 [46.581888] do_filp_open+0x9c/0x130 [46.581920] do_sys_openat2+0x2ec/0x430 [46.581961] do_sys_open+0x90/0xc0 [46.581993] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582037] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582078] [46.582078] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [46.582135] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.582176] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.582263] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.582308] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.582353] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.582388] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.582434] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.582481] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.582558] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.582605] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.582651] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.582697] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.582733] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582777] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582822] [46.582822] other info that might help us debug this: [46.582822] [46.582888] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [46.582888] [46.582942] CPU0 CPU1 [46.582984] ---- ---- [46.583028] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583062] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583119] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583174] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583212] [46.583212] *** DEADLOCK *** [46.583212] [46.583266] 6 locks held by cloner/3835: [46.583299] #0: c00000001301d448 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.583382] #1: c00000000f6d3768 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x58/0xc0 [46.583477] #2: c00000000f6d72a8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x9c/0xc0 [46.583574] #3: c00000000f6d7138 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xd0/0x590 [46.583657] #4: c00000000f6d35f8 (&ei->i_mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xe0/0x590 [46.583743] #5: c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.583828] [46.583828] stack backtrace: [46.583872] CPU: 1 PID: 3835 Comm: cloner Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1 #28 [46.583931] Call Trace: [46.583955] [c0000000167c7200] [c000000000c1ee78] dump_stack+0xec/0x144 (unreliable) [46.584052] [c0000000167c7240] [c000000000274058] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x3a8/0x400 [46.584123] [c0000000167c72e0] [c0000000002741f4] check_noncircular+0x144/0x190 [46.584191] [c0000000167c73b0] [c000000000278fc0] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.584259] [c0000000167c74f0] [c00000000027aa94] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.584317] [c0000000167c75e0] [c000000000a0d6cc] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.584388] [c0000000167c7690] [c000000000af47a4] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.584457] [c0000000167c77c0] [c000000000af525c] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.584514] [c0000000167c7990] [c000000000af5698] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.584583] [c0000000167c7a00] [c000000000af5b58] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.584652] [c0000000167c7ae0] [c0000000005d81dc] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.584722] [c0000000167c7b40] [c0000000005d84f0] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.584793] [c0000000167c7bb0] [c00000000058bf80] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.584861] [c0000000167c7c10] [c00000000058c894] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.584922] [c0000000167c7d10] [c00000000058db4c] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.584978] [c0000000167c7d60] [c0000000000364a4] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.585046] [c0000000167c7e10] [c00000000000d45c] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.585114] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585160] NIP: 00007ffff7e22990 LR: 00000001000010ec CTR: 0000000000000000 [46.585224] REGS: c0000000167c7e80 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted (5.13.0-rc1) [46.585280] MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000244 XER: 00000000 [46.585374] IRQMASK: 0 [46.585374] GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffffffdec0 00007ffff7f17100 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR04: 000000008020940d 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR08: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007ffff7ffa940 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR20: 0000000000000000 000000009123683e 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR28: 0000000100030260 0000000100030280 0000000000000003 000000000000005f [46.585919] NIP [00007ffff7e22990] 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585964] LR [00000001000010ec] 0x1000010ec [46.586010] --- interrupt: c00 This should be a false positive, as both locks are acquired in read mode. Nevertheless, we don't need to hold a leaf locked when we start the transaction, so just release the leaf (path) before starting it. Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210513214404.xks77p566fglzgum@riteshh-domain/ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
vanmaegima
pushed a commit
to vanmaegima/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2021
Add Over sample ratio kcontrol interface, allow user to specify over sample ratio amixer -c1 cget numid=1 numid=1,iface=MIXER,name='over sampling ratio' ; type=ENUMERATED,access=rw------,values=1,items=5 ; Item #0 'OSR_4x12' ; Item foundriesio#1 'OSR_4x16' ; Item foundriesio#2 'OSR_4x24' ; Item foundriesio#3 'OSR_4x32' ; Item foundriesio#4 'OSR_4x48' : values=0 Set different OSR amixer -c1 cset numid=1 2 Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Viorel Suman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2021
commit 376565b upstream. KMSAN complains that the vmci_use_ppn64() == false path in vmci_dbell_register_notification_bitmap() left upper 32bits of bitmap_set_msg.bitmap_ppn64 member uninitialized. ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in kmsan_check_memory+0xd/0x10 CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #4 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 02/27/2020 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x21c/0x280 kmsan_report+0xfb/0x1e0 kmsan_internal_check_memory+0x484/0x520 kmsan_check_memory+0xd/0x10 iowrite8_rep+0x86/0x380 vmci_send_datagram+0x150/0x280 vmci_dbell_register_notification_bitmap+0x133/0x1e0 vmci_guest_probe_device+0xcab/0x1e70 pci_device_probe+0xab3/0xe70 really_probe+0xd16/0x24d0 driver_probe_device+0x29d/0x3a0 device_driver_attach+0x25a/0x490 __driver_attach+0x78c/0x840 bus_for_each_dev+0x210/0x340 driver_attach+0x89/0xb0 bus_add_driver+0x677/0xc40 driver_register+0x485/0x8e0 __pci_register_driver+0x1ff/0x350 vmci_guest_init+0x3e/0x41 vmci_drv_init+0x1d6/0x43f do_one_initcall+0x39c/0x9a0 do_initcall_level+0x1d7/0x259 do_initcalls+0x127/0x1cb do_basic_setup+0x33/0x36 kernel_init_freeable+0x29a/0x3ed kernel_init+0x1f/0x840 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Local variable ----bitmap_set_msg@vmci_dbell_register_notification_bitmap created at: vmci_dbell_register_notification_bitmap+0x50/0x1e0 vmci_dbell_register_notification_bitmap+0x50/0x1e0 Bytes 28-31 of 32 are uninitialized Memory access of size 32 starts at ffff88810098f570 ===================================================== Fixes: 83e2ec7 ("VMCI: doorbell implementation.") Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2021
commit b2192cf upstream. KMSAN complains that vmci_check_host_caps() left the payload part of check_msg uninitialized. ===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in kmsan_check_memory+0xd/0x10 CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G B 5.11.0-rc7+ #4 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 02/27/2020 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x21c/0x280 kmsan_report+0xfb/0x1e0 kmsan_internal_check_memory+0x202/0x520 kmsan_check_memory+0xd/0x10 iowrite8_rep+0x86/0x380 vmci_guest_probe_device+0xf0b/0x1e70 pci_device_probe+0xab3/0xe70 really_probe+0xd16/0x24d0 driver_probe_device+0x29d/0x3a0 device_driver_attach+0x25a/0x490 __driver_attach+0x78c/0x840 bus_for_each_dev+0x210/0x340 driver_attach+0x89/0xb0 bus_add_driver+0x677/0xc40 driver_register+0x485/0x8e0 __pci_register_driver+0x1ff/0x350 vmci_guest_init+0x3e/0x41 vmci_drv_init+0x1d6/0x43f do_one_initcall+0x39c/0x9a0 do_initcall_level+0x1d7/0x259 do_initcalls+0x127/0x1cb do_basic_setup+0x33/0x36 kernel_init_freeable+0x29a/0x3ed kernel_init+0x1f/0x840 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Uninit was created at: kmsan_internal_poison_shadow+0x5c/0xf0 kmsan_slab_alloc+0x8d/0xe0 kmem_cache_alloc+0x84f/0xe30 vmci_guest_probe_device+0xd11/0x1e70 pci_device_probe+0xab3/0xe70 really_probe+0xd16/0x24d0 driver_probe_device+0x29d/0x3a0 device_driver_attach+0x25a/0x490 __driver_attach+0x78c/0x840 bus_for_each_dev+0x210/0x340 driver_attach+0x89/0xb0 bus_add_driver+0x677/0xc40 driver_register+0x485/0x8e0 __pci_register_driver+0x1ff/0x350 vmci_guest_init+0x3e/0x41 vmci_drv_init+0x1d6/0x43f do_one_initcall+0x39c/0x9a0 do_initcall_level+0x1d7/0x259 do_initcalls+0x127/0x1cb do_basic_setup+0x33/0x36 kernel_init_freeable+0x29a/0x3ed kernel_init+0x1f/0x840 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Bytes 28-31 of 36 are uninitialized Memory access of size 36 starts at ffff8881675e5f00 ===================================================== Fixes: 1f16643 ("VMCI: guest side driver implementation.") Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2c48441 ] lz4 compatible decompressor is simple. The format is underspecified and relies on EOF notification to determine when to stop. Initramfs buffer format[1] explicitly states that it can have arbitrary number of zero padding. Thus when operating without a fill function, be extra careful to ensure that sizes less than 4, or apperantly empty chunksizes are treated as EOF. To test this I have created two cpio initrds, first a normal one, main.cpio. And second one with just a single /test-file with content "second" second.cpio. Then i compressed both of them with gzip, and with lz4 -l. Then I created a padding of 4 bytes (dd if=/dev/zero of=pad4 bs=1 count=4). To create four testcase initrds: 1) main.cpio.gzip + extra.cpio.gzip = pad0.gzip 2) main.cpio.lz4 + extra.cpio.lz4 = pad0.lz4 3) main.cpio.gzip + pad4 + extra.cpio.gzip = pad4.gzip 4) main.cpio.lz4 + pad4 + extra.cpio.lz4 = pad4.lz4 The pad4 test-cases replicate the initrd load by grub, as it pads and aligns every initrd it loads. All of the above boot, however /test-file was not accessible in the initrd for the testcase #4, as decoding in lz4 decompressor failed. Also an error message printed which usually is harmless. Whith a patched kernel, all of the above testcases now pass, and /test-file is accessible. This fixes lz4 initrd decompress warning on every boot with grub. And more importantly this fixes inability to load multiple lz4 compressed initrds with grub. This patch has been shipping in Ubuntu kernels since January 2021. [1] ./Documentation/driver-api/early-userspace/buffer-format.rst BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835660 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ # v0 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <[email protected]> Cc: Kyungsik Lee <[email protected]> Cc: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> Cc: Bongkyu Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Sven Schmidt <[email protected]> Cc: Rajat Asthana <[email protected]> Cc: Nick Terrell <[email protected]> Cc: Gao Xiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2021
commit 4385539 upstream. The ordering of MSI-X enable in hardware is dysfunctional: 1) MSI-X is disabled in the control register 2) Various setup functions 3) pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs() is invoked which ends up accessing the MSI-X table entries 4) MSI-X is enabled and masked in the control register with the comment that enabling is required for some hardware to access the MSI-X table Step #4 obviously contradicts #3. The history of this is an issue with the NIU hardware. When #4 was introduced the table access actually happened in msix_program_entries() which was invoked after enabling and masking MSI-X. This was changed in commit d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts") which removed the table write from msix_program_entries(). Interestingly enough nobody noticed and either NIU still works or it did not get any testing with a kernel 3.19 or later. Nevertheless this is inconsistent and there is no reason why MSI-X can't be enabled and masked in the control register early on, i.e. move step #4 above to step #1. This preserves the NIU workaround and has no side effects on other hardware. Fixes: d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2021
commit 67069a1 upstream. ASan reported a memory leak caused by info_linear not being deallocated. The info_linear was allocated during in perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog(). This patch adds the corresponding free() when bpf_prog_info_node is freed in perf_env__purge_bpf(). $ sudo ./perf record -- sleep 5 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.025 MB perf.data (8 samples) ] ================================================================= ==297735==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 7688 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4f420f in malloc (/home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x4f420f) #1 0xc06a74 in bpf_program__get_prog_info_linear /home/user/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:11113:16 #2 0xb426fe in perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c:191:16 #3 0xb42008 in perf_event__synthesize_bpf_events /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c:410:9 #4 0x594596 in record__synthesize /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1490:8 #5 0x58c9ac in __cmd_record /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1798:8 #6 0x58990b in cmd_record /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2901:8 #7 0x7b2a20 in run_builtin /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #8 0x7b12ff in handle_internal_command /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #9 0x7b2583 in run_argv /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #10 0x7b0d79 in main /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 #11 0x7fa357ef6b74 in __libc_start_main /usr/src/debug/glibc-2.33-8.fc34.x86_64/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:332:16 Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Cc: KP Singh <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]> Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2021
commit 41d5854 upstream. I got several memory leak reports from Asan with a simple command. It was because VDSO is not released due to the refcount. Like in __dsos_addnew_id(), it should put the refcount after adding to the list. $ perf record true [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.030 MB perf.data (10 samples) ] ================================================================= ==692599==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 439 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fea52341037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154 #1 0x559bce4aa8ee in dso__new_id util/dso.c:1256 #2 0x559bce59245a in __machine__addnew_vdso util/vdso.c:132 #3 0x559bce59245a in machine__findnew_vdso util/vdso.c:347 #4 0x559bce50826c in map__new util/map.c:175 #5 0x559bce503c92 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1787 #6 0x559bce512f6b in machines__deliver_event util/session.c:1481 #7 0x559bce515107 in perf_session__deliver_event util/session.c:1551 #8 0x559bce51d4d2 in do_flush util/ordered-events.c:244 #9 0x559bce51d4d2 in __ordered_events__flush util/ordered-events.c:323 #10 0x559bce519bea in __perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2268 #11 0x559bce519bea in perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2297 #12 0x559bce2e7a52 in process_buildids /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1017 #13 0x559bce2e7a52 in record__finish_output /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1234 #14 0x559bce2ed4f6 in __cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2026 #15 0x559bce2ed4f6 in cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2858 #16 0x559bce422db4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313 #17 0x559bce2acac8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365 #18 0x559bce2acac8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409 #19 0x559bce2acac8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539 #20 0x7fea51e76d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Indirect leak of 32 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fea52341037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154 #1 0x559bce520907 in nsinfo__copy util/namespaces.c:169 #2 0x559bce50821b in map__new util/map.c:168 #3 0x559bce503c92 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1787 #4 0x559bce512f6b in machines__deliver_event util/session.c:1481 #5 0x559bce515107 in perf_session__deliver_event util/session.c:1551 #6 0x559bce51d4d2 in do_flush util/ordered-events.c:244 #7 0x559bce51d4d2 in __ordered_events__flush util/ordered-events.c:323 #8 0x559bce519bea in __perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2268 #9 0x559bce519bea in perf_session__process_events util/session.c:2297 #10 0x559bce2e7a52 in process_buildids /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1017 #11 0x559bce2e7a52 in record__finish_output /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1234 #12 0x559bce2ed4f6 in __cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2026 #13 0x559bce2ed4f6 in cmd_record /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2858 #14 0x559bce422db4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313 #15 0x559bce2acac8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365 #16 0x559bce2acac8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409 #17 0x559bce2acac8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539 #18 0x7fea51e76d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 471 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
[ Upstream commit 21e3980 ] vctrl_enable() and vctrl_disable() call regulator_enable() and regulator_disable(), respectively. However, vctrl_* are regulator ops and should not be calling the locked regulator APIs. Doing so results in a lockdep warning. Instead of exporting more internal regulator ops, model the ctrl supply as an actual supply to vctrl-regulator. At probe time this driver still needs to use the consumer API to fetch its constraints, but otherwise lets the regulator core handle the upstream supply for it. The enable/disable/is_enabled ops are not removed, but now only track state internally. This preserves the original behavior with the ops being available, but one could argue that the original behavior was already incorrect: the internal state would not match the upstream supply if that supply had another consumer that enabled the supply, while vctrl-regulator was not enabled. The lockdep warning is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc6 #2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffc011306d00 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) but task is already holding lock: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) ww_mutex_lock (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1199) regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) regulator_lock_dependent (drivers/regulator/core.c:343) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536) regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486) devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196) reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289) platform_probe (drivers/base/platform.c:1427) [...] -> #1 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: regulator_lock_dependent (include/linux/ww_mutex.h:129 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) set_machine_constraints (drivers/regulator/core.c:1536) regulator_register (drivers/regulator/core.c:5486) devm_regulator_register (drivers/regulator/devres.c:196) reg_fixed_voltage_probe (drivers/regulator/fixed.c:289) [...] -> #0 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4)) lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627) __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125) regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400) _regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617) _regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308 drivers/regulator/core.c:2809) _set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164) set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62) __cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271) cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2)) cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563) subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?) cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819) dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344) [...] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: regulator_list_mutex --> regulator_ww_class_acquire --> regulator_ww_class_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex); lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire); lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex); lock(regulator_list_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by swapper/0/1: #0: ffffff8002d32188 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_driver_lock (drivers/base/dd.c:1030) #1: ffffffc0111a0520 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2792 (discriminator 2)) #2: ffffff8002a8d918 (subsys mutex#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:1033) #3: ffffff800341bb90 (&policy->rwsem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpufreq_online (include/linux/bitmap.h:285 include/linux/cpumask.h:405 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1399) #4: ffffffc011f0b7b8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) #5: ffffff8004a77160 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_recursive (drivers/regulator/core.c:156 drivers/regulator/core.c:263) stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6 #2 7c8f8996d021ed0f65271e6aeebf7999de74a9fa Hardware name: Google Scarlet (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:161) show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:218) dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:106 (discriminator 2)) dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:113) print_circular_bug (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) check_noncircular (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:?) __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3052 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 (discriminator 4) kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 (discriminator 4)) lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:39 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:438 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5627) __mutex_lock_common (include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:606 include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:29 kernel/locking/mutex.c:103 kernel/locking/mutex.c:144 kernel/locking/mutex.c:963) mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:1125) regulator_lock_dependent (arch/arm64/include/asm/current.h:19 include/linux/ww_mutex.h:111 drivers/regulator/core.c:329) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2808) vctrl_enable (drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c:400) _regulator_do_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2617) _regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:2764) regulator_enable (drivers/regulator/core.c:308 drivers/regulator/core.c:2809) _set_opp (drivers/opp/core.c:819 drivers/opp/core.c:1072) dev_pm_opp_set_rate (drivers/opp/core.c:1164) set_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:62) __cpufreq_driver_target (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2216 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2271) cpufreq_online (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1488 (discriminator 2)) cpufreq_add_dev (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1563) subsys_interface_register (drivers/base/bus.c:?) cpufreq_register_driver (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2819) dt_cpufreq_probe (drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c:344) [...] Reported-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]> Fixes: f8702f9 ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking") Fixes: e915331 ("regulator: vctrl-regulator: Avoid deadlock getting and setting the voltage") Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
commit 57f0ff0 upstream. It's later supposed to be either a correct address or NULL. Without the initialization, it may contain an undefined value which results in the following segmentation fault: # perf top --sort comm -g --ignore-callees=do_idle terminates with: #0 0x00007ffff56b7685 in __strlen_avx2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff55e3802 in strdup () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00005555558cb139 in hist_entry__init (callchain_size=<optimized out>, sample_self=true, template=0x7fffde7fb110, he=0x7fffd801c250) at util/hist.c:489 #3 hist_entry__new (template=template@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:564 #4 0x00005555558cb4ba in hists__findnew_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, entry=entry@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:657 #5 0x00005555558cba1b in __hists__add_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, al=0x7fffde7fb420, sym_parent=<optimized out>, bi=bi@entry=0x0, mi=mi@entry=0x0, sample=sample@entry=0x7fffde7fb4b0, sample_self=true, ops=0x0, block_info=0x0) at util/hist.c:288 #6 0x00005555558cbb70 in hists__add_entry (sample_self=true, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, mi=0x0, bi=0x0, sym_parent=<optimized out>, al=<optimized out>, hists=0x5555561d9e38) at util/hist.c:1056 #7 iter_add_single_cumulative_entry (iter=0x7fffde7fb460, al=<optimized out>) at util/hist.c:1056 #8 0x00005555558cc8a4 in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=iter@entry=0x7fffde7fb460, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, max_stack_depth=<optimized out>, arg=arg@entry=0x7fffffff7db0) at util/hist.c:1231 #9 0x00005555557cdc9a in perf_event__process_sample (machine=<optimized out>, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, evsel=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, tool=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:842 #10 deliver_event (qe=<optimized out>, qevent=<optimized out>) at builtin-top.c:1202 #11 0x00005555558a9318 in do_flush (show_progress=false, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:244 #12 __ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=timestamp@entry=0) at util/ordered-events.c:323 #13 0x00005555558a9789 in __ordered_events__flush (timestamp=<optimized out>, how=<optimized out>, oe=<optimized out>) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #14 ordered_events__flush (how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:341 #15 ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #16 0x00005555557cd631 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:1114 #17 0x00007ffff7bb817a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #18 0x00007ffff5656dc3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 If you look at the frame #2, the code is: 488 if (he->srcline) { 489 he->srcline = strdup(he->srcline); 490 if (he->srcline == NULL) 491 goto err_rawdata; 492 } If he->srcline is not NULL (it is not NULL if it is uninitialized rubbish), it gets strdupped and strdupping a rubbish random string causes the problem. Also, if you look at the commit 1fb7d06, it adds the srcline property into the struct, but not initializing it everywhere needed. Committer notes: Now I see, when using --ignore-callees=do_idle we end up here at line 2189 in add_callchain_ip(): 2181 if (al.sym != NULL) { 2182 if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent && 2183 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex)) 2184 *parent = al.sym; 2185 else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al && 2186 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) { 2187 /* Treat this symbol as the root, 2188 forgetting its callees. */ 2189 *root_al = al; 2190 callchain_cursor_reset(cursor); 2191 } 2192 } And the al that doesn't have the ->srcline field initialized will be copied to the root_al, so then, back to: 1211 int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct addr_location *al, 1212 int max_stack_depth, void *arg) 1213 { 1214 int err, err2; 1215 struct map *alm = NULL; 1216 1217 if (al) 1218 alm = map__get(al->map); 1219 1220 err = sample__resolve_callchain(iter->sample, &callchain_cursor, &iter->parent, 1221 iter->evsel, al, max_stack_depth); 1222 if (err) { 1223 map__put(alm); 1224 return err; 1225 } 1226 1227 err = iter->ops->prepare_entry(iter, al); 1228 if (err) 1229 goto out; 1230 1231 err = iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); 1232 if (err) 1233 goto out; 1234 That al at line 1221 is what hist_entry_iter__add() (called from sample__resolve_callchain()) saw as 'root_al', and then: iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); will go on with al->srcline with a bogus value, I'll add the above sequence to the cset and apply, thanks! Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <[email protected]> CC: Milian Wolff <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Fixes: 1fb7d06 ("perf report Use srcline from callchain for hist entries") Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
[ Upstream commit 8f96a5b ] We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that blkid knows the device changed. However we do this by re-opening the block device and calling filp_update_time. This is more correct because it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev inodes do not do this. Instead call generic_update_time() on the bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock: ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 file_open_name+0xc7/0x170 filp_open+0x2c/0x50 btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11596: #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
commit 13be2ef upstream. As previously noted in commit 66e4f4a ("rtc: cmos: Use spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"): <4>[ 254.192378] WARNING: inconsistent lock state <4>[ 254.192384] 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1 Not tainted <4>[ 254.192396] -------------------------------- <4>[ 254.192400] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. <4>[ 254.192409] rtcwake/5309 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: <4>[ 254.192429] ffffffff8263c5f8 (rtc_lock){?...}-{2:2}, at: cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.192481] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: <4>[ 254.192488] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.192504] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 <4>[ 254.192519] cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.192536] rtc_handler+0x1f/0xc0 <4>[ 254.192553] acpi_ev_fixed_event_detect+0x109/0x13c <4>[ 254.192574] acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0xb/0x28 <4>[ 254.192596] acpi_irq+0x13/0x30 <4>[ 254.192620] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0 <4>[ 254.192641] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70 <4>[ 254.192661] handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50 <4>[ 254.192680] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9e/0x150 <4>[ 254.192693] __common_interrupt+0x76/0x140 <4>[ 254.192715] common_interrupt+0x96/0xc0 <4>[ 254.192732] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 <4>[ 254.192750] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x38/0x60 <4>[ 254.192767] resume_irqs+0xba/0xf0 <4>[ 254.192786] dpm_resume_noirq+0x245/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.192811] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x230/0xaa0 <4>[ 254.192835] pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a <4>[ 254.192859] state_store+0x7b/0xe0 <4>[ 254.192879] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.192899] new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0 <4>[ 254.192916] vfs_write+0x265/0x390 <4>[ 254.192933] ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.192949] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 <4>[ 254.192965] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae <4>[ 254.192986] irq event stamp: 43775 <4>[ 254.192994] hardirqs last enabled at (43775): [<ffffffff81c00c42>] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 <4>[ 254.193023] hardirqs last disabled at (43774): [<ffffffff81aa691a>] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0xb0 <4>[ 254.193049] softirqs last enabled at (42548): [<ffffffff81e00342>] __do_softirq+0x342/0x48e <4>[ 254.193074] softirqs last disabled at (42543): [<ffffffff810b45fd>] irq_exit_rcu+0xad/0xd0 <4>[ 254.193101] other info that might help us debug this: <4>[ 254.193107] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4>[ 254.193112] CPU0 <4>[ 254.193117] ---- <4>[ 254.193121] lock(rtc_lock); <4>[ 254.193137] <Interrupt> <4>[ 254.193142] lock(rtc_lock); <4>[ 254.193156] *** DEADLOCK *** <4>[ 254.193161] 6 locks held by rtcwake/5309: <4>[ 254.193174] #0: ffff888104861430 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.193232] #1: ffff88810f823288 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xe7/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.193282] #2: ffff888100cef3c0 (kn->active#285 <7>[ 254.192706] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_modeset_setup_hw_state [i915]] [CRTC:51:pipe A] hw state readout: disabled <4>[ 254.193307] ){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf0/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.193333] #3: ffffffff82649fa8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend.cold.8+0xce/0x34a <4>[ 254.193387] #4: ffffffff827a2108 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x47/0x70 <4>[ 254.193433] #5: ffff8881019ea178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_resume+0x68/0x1e0 <4>[ 254.193485] stack backtrace: <4>[ 254.193492] CPU: 1 PID: 5309 Comm: rtcwake Not tainted 5.12.0-rc1-CI-CI_DRM_9834+ #1 <4>[ 254.193514] Hardware name: Google Soraka/Soraka, BIOS MrChromebox-4.10 08/25/2019 <4>[ 254.193524] Call Trace: <4>[ 254.193536] dump_stack+0x7f/0xad <4>[ 254.193567] mark_lock.part.47+0x8ca/0xce0 <4>[ 254.193604] __lock_acquire+0x39b/0x2590 <4>[ 254.193626] ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 <4>[ 254.193660] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 <4>[ 254.193677] ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193716] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 <4>[ 254.193735] ? cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193758] cmos_interrupt+0x18/0x100 <4>[ 254.193785] cmos_resume+0x2ac/0x2d0 <4>[ 254.193813] ? acpi_pm_set_device_wakeup+0x1f/0x110 <4>[ 254.193842] ? pnp_bus_suspend+0x10/0x10 <4>[ 254.193864] pnp_bus_resume+0x5e/0x90 <4>[ 254.193885] dpm_run_callback+0x5f/0x240 <4>[ 254.193914] device_resume+0xb2/0x1e0 <4>[ 254.193942] ? pm_dev_err+0x25/0x25 <4>[ 254.193974] dpm_resume+0xea/0x3f0 <4>[ 254.194005] dpm_resume_end+0x8/0x10 <4>[ 254.194030] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x29b/0xaa0 <4>[ 254.194066] pm_suspend.cold.8+0x301/0x34a <4>[ 254.194094] state_store+0x7b/0xe0 <4>[ 254.194124] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x1c0 <4>[ 254.194151] new_sync_write+0x11d/0x1b0 <4>[ 254.194183] vfs_write+0x265/0x390 <4>[ 254.194207] ksys_write+0x5a/0xd0 <4>[ 254.194232] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 <4>[ 254.194251] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae <4>[ 254.194274] RIP: 0033:0x7f07d79691e7 <4>[ 254.194293] Code: 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bb 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24 <4>[ 254.194312] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9cc2c768 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 <4>[ 254.194337] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f07d79691e7 <4>[ 254.194352] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000556ebfc63590 RDI: 000000000000000b <4>[ 254.194366] RBP: 0000556ebfc63590 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000004 <4>[ 254.194379] R10: 0000556ebf0ec2a6 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 which breaks S3-resume on fi-kbl-soraka presumably as that's slow enough to trigger the alarm during the suspend. Fixes: 6950d04 ("rtc: cmos: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ") References: 66e4f4a ("rtc: cmos: Use spin_lock_irqsave() in cmos_interrupt()"): Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Xiaofei Tan <[email protected]> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
commit 57f0ff0 upstream. It's later supposed to be either a correct address or NULL. Without the initialization, it may contain an undefined value which results in the following segmentation fault: # perf top --sort comm -g --ignore-callees=do_idle terminates with: #0 0x00007ffff56b7685 in __strlen_avx2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff55e3802 in strdup () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00005555558cb139 in hist_entry__init (callchain_size=<optimized out>, sample_self=true, template=0x7fffde7fb110, he=0x7fffd801c250) at util/hist.c:489 #3 hist_entry__new (template=template@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:564 #4 0x00005555558cb4ba in hists__findnew_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, entry=entry@entry=0x7fffde7fb110, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, sample_self=sample_self@entry=true) at util/hist.c:657 #5 0x00005555558cba1b in __hists__add_entry (hists=hists@entry=0x5555561d9e38, al=0x7fffde7fb420, sym_parent=<optimized out>, bi=bi@entry=0x0, mi=mi@entry=0x0, sample=sample@entry=0x7fffde7fb4b0, sample_self=true, ops=0x0, block_info=0x0) at util/hist.c:288 #6 0x00005555558cbb70 in hists__add_entry (sample_self=true, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, mi=0x0, bi=0x0, sym_parent=<optimized out>, al=<optimized out>, hists=0x5555561d9e38) at util/hist.c:1056 #7 iter_add_single_cumulative_entry (iter=0x7fffde7fb460, al=<optimized out>) at util/hist.c:1056 #8 0x00005555558cc8a4 in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=iter@entry=0x7fffde7fb460, al=al@entry=0x7fffde7fb420, max_stack_depth=<optimized out>, arg=arg@entry=0x7fffffff7db0) at util/hist.c:1231 #9 0x00005555557cdc9a in perf_event__process_sample (machine=<optimized out>, sample=0x7fffde7fb4b0, evsel=<optimized out>, event=<optimized out>, tool=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:842 #10 deliver_event (qe=<optimized out>, qevent=<optimized out>) at builtin-top.c:1202 #11 0x00005555558a9318 in do_flush (show_progress=false, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:244 #12 __ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=timestamp@entry=0) at util/ordered-events.c:323 #13 0x00005555558a9789 in __ordered_events__flush (timestamp=<optimized out>, how=<optimized out>, oe=<optimized out>) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #14 ordered_events__flush (how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, oe=0x7fffffff80e0) at util/ordered-events.c:341 #15 ordered_events__flush (oe=oe@entry=0x7fffffff80e0, how=how@entry=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:339 #16 0x00005555557cd631 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff7db0) at builtin-top.c:1114 #17 0x00007ffff7bb817a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #18 0x00007ffff5656dc3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 If you look at the frame #2, the code is: 488 if (he->srcline) { 489 he->srcline = strdup(he->srcline); 490 if (he->srcline == NULL) 491 goto err_rawdata; 492 } If he->srcline is not NULL (it is not NULL if it is uninitialized rubbish), it gets strdupped and strdupping a rubbish random string causes the problem. Also, if you look at the commit 1fb7d06, it adds the srcline property into the struct, but not initializing it everywhere needed. Committer notes: Now I see, when using --ignore-callees=do_idle we end up here at line 2189 in add_callchain_ip(): 2181 if (al.sym != NULL) { 2182 if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent && 2183 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex)) 2184 *parent = al.sym; 2185 else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al && 2186 symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) { 2187 /* Treat this symbol as the root, 2188 forgetting its callees. */ 2189 *root_al = al; 2190 callchain_cursor_reset(cursor); 2191 } 2192 } And the al that doesn't have the ->srcline field initialized will be copied to the root_al, so then, back to: 1211 int hist_entry_iter__add(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, struct addr_location *al, 1212 int max_stack_depth, void *arg) 1213 { 1214 int err, err2; 1215 struct map *alm = NULL; 1216 1217 if (al) 1218 alm = map__get(al->map); 1219 1220 err = sample__resolve_callchain(iter->sample, &callchain_cursor, &iter->parent, 1221 iter->evsel, al, max_stack_depth); 1222 if (err) { 1223 map__put(alm); 1224 return err; 1225 } 1226 1227 err = iter->ops->prepare_entry(iter, al); 1228 if (err) 1229 goto out; 1230 1231 err = iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); 1232 if (err) 1233 goto out; 1234 That al at line 1221 is what hist_entry_iter__add() (called from sample__resolve_callchain()) saw as 'root_al', and then: iter->ops->add_single_entry(iter, al); will go on with al->srcline with a bogus value, I'll add the above sequence to the cset and apply, thanks! Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <[email protected]> CC: Milian Wolff <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Fixes: 1fb7d06 ("perf report Use srcline from callchain for hist entries") Link: https //lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
[ Upstream commit 8f96a5b ] We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that blkid knows the device changed. However we do this by re-opening the block device and calling filp_update_time. This is more correct because it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev inodes do not do this. Instead call generic_update_time() on the bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock: ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 file_open_name+0xc7/0x170 filp_open+0x2c/0x50 btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11596: #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
[ Upstream commit 3fa421d ] When removing the device we call blkdev_put() on the device once we've removed it, and because we have an EXCL open we need to take the ->open_mutex on the block device to clean it up. Unfortunately during device remove we are holding the sb writers lock, which results in the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11595 is trying to acquire lock: ffff973ac35dd138 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_put+0x3a/0x220 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x62/0xe5 btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11595: #0: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11595 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fc21255d4cb So instead save the bdev and do the put once we've dropped the sb writers lock in order to avoid the lockdep recursion. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ricardosalveti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2021
[ Upstream commit dfbb340 ] If CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP && CONFIG_MTD (at least; there might be other combinations), lockdep complains circular locking dependency at __loop_clr_fd(), for major_names_lock serves as a locking dependency aggregating hub across multiple block modules. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0+ #757 Tainted: G E ------------------------------------------------------ systemd-udevd/7568 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88800f334d48 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 but task is already holding lock: ffff888014a7d4a0 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x4d/0x400 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x17/0x20 lo_open+0x23/0x50 [loop] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x199/0x540 blkdev_open+0x58/0x90 do_dentry_open+0x144/0x3a0 path_openat+0xa57/0xda0 do_filp_open+0x9f/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0x150 __x64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #5 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 bd_register_pending_holders+0x20/0x100 device_add_disk+0x1ae/0x390 loop_add+0x29c/0x2d0 [loop] blk_request_module+0x5a/0xb0 blkdev_get_no_open+0x27/0xa0 blkdev_get_by_dev+0x5f/0x540 blkdev_open+0x58/0x90 do_dentry_open+0x144/0x3a0 path_openat+0xa57/0xda0 do_filp_open+0x9f/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0x150 __x64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (major_names_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 blkdev_show+0x19/0x80 devinfo_show+0x52/0x60 seq_read_iter+0x2d5/0x3e0 proc_reg_read_iter+0x41/0x80 vfs_read+0x2ac/0x330 ksys_read+0x6b/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 seq_read_iter+0x37/0x3e0 generic_file_splice_read+0xf3/0x170 splice_direct_to_actor+0x14e/0x350 do_splice_direct+0x84/0xd0 do_sendfile+0x263/0x430 __se_sys_sendfile64+0x96/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 lo_write_bvec+0x96/0x280 [loop] loop_process_work+0xa68/0xc10 [loop] process_one_work+0x293/0x480 worker_thread+0x23d/0x4b0 kthread+0x163/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 process_one_work+0x280/0x480 worker_thread+0x23d/0x4b0 kthread+0x163/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: validate_chain+0x1f0d/0x33e0 __lock_acquire+0x92d/0x1030 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 flush_workqueue+0x8c/0x560 drain_workqueue+0x80/0x140 destroy_workqueue+0x47/0x4f0 __loop_clr_fd+0xb4/0x400 [loop] blkdev_put+0x14a/0x1d0 blkdev_close+0x1c/0x20 __fput+0xfd/0x220 task_work_run+0x69/0xc0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1ce/0x1f0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by systemd-udevd/7568: #0: ffff888012554128 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x4c/0x1d0 #1: ffff888014a7d4a0 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x4d/0x400 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7568 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G E 5.14.0+ #757 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 02/27/2020 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x79/0xbf print_circular_bug+0x5d6/0x5e0 ? stack_trace_save+0x42/0x60 ? save_trace+0x3d/0x2d0 check_noncircular+0x10b/0x120 validate_chain+0x1f0d/0x33e0 ? __lock_acquire+0x953/0x1030 ? __lock_acquire+0x953/0x1030 __lock_acquire+0x92d/0x1030 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 flush_workqueue+0x8c/0x560 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xe/0x1a0 ? drain_workqueue+0x41/0x140 drain_workqueue+0x80/0x140 destroy_workqueue+0x47/0x4f0 ? blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0xac/0xd0 __loop_clr_fd+0xb4/0x400 [loop] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x35/0x230 blkdev_put+0x14a/0x1d0 blkdev_close+0x1c/0x20 __fput+0xfd/0x220 task_work_run+0x69/0xc0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1ce/0x1f0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f0fd4c661f7 Code: 00 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 c3 48 83 ec 18 89 7c 24 0c e8 13 fc ff ff RSP: 002b:00007ffd1c9e9fd8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f0fd46be6c8 RCX: 00007f0fd4c661f7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 0000000000000006 R08: 000055fff1eaf400 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f0fd46be6c8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000002f08 R15: 00007ffd1c9ea050 Commit 1c500ad ("loop: reduce the loop_ctl_mutex scope") is for breaking "loop_ctl_mutex => &lo->lo_mutex" dependency chain. But enabling a different block module results in forming circular locking dependency due to shared major_names_lock mutex. The simplest fix is to call probe function without holding major_names_lock [1], but Christoph Hellwig does not like such idea. Therefore, instead of holding major_names_lock in blkdev_show(), introduce a different lock for blkdev_show() in order to break "sb_writers#$N => &p->lock => major_names_lock" dependency chain. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [1] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.