Repository navigation
fix: Oveview Page Redirect and Contributing Section Redirects Links… - #3365
mattinannt merged 2 commits into
Conversation
|
@iamitpal is attempting to deploy a commit to the formbricks Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the documentation files for the Formbricks project. Specifically, the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/docs/app/developer-docs/contributing/get-started/page.mdx (1)
Line range hint
1-190: Overall: Documentation improvements enhance contributor experience.The changes made to this file effectively address the PR objectives by updating the metadata for better engagement and fixing redirect issues in the contributing documentation. These improvements will enhance the experience for new contributors and align with the goal of maintaining clear and accessible documentation.
A few suggestions for further improvement:
- Consider adding a table of contents at the beginning of the document for easier navigation.
- Review the "Setup Dev Environment" section to ensure it's up-to-date with the latest development practices.
- Add a section on code style and formatting expectations to maintain consistency across contributions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...er** to explore and develop. For junior developers we suggest using either of these, becau...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[formatting] ~41-~41: If the ‘because’ clause is essential to the meaning, do not use a comma before the clause.
Context: ...elopers we suggest using either of these, because you can dive into coding within minutes...(COMMA_BEFORE_BECAUSE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/docs/app/developer-docs/contributing/get-started/page.mdx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/app/developer-docs/overview/page.mdx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/docs/app/developer-docs/overview/page.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/docs/app/developer-docs/contributing/get-started/page.mdx (1)
Line range hint
3-7: LGTM: Metadata updates improve clarity and engagement.The updated title and description in the metadata provide a more comprehensive and engaging overview of the contribution process. These changes align well with the document's content and should improve SEO and user understanding.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...er** to explore and develop. For junior developers we suggest using either of these, becau...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[formatting] ~41-~41: If the ‘because’ clause is essential to the meaning, do not use a comma before the clause.
Context: ...elopers we suggest using either of these, because you can dive into coding within minutes...(COMMA_BEFORE_BECAUSE)
| - [Gitpod](/developer-docs/contributing/gitpod) | ||
| - [GitHub Codespaces](/developer-docs/contributing/codespaces) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue Found: Remaining absolute paths detected.
While the links in apps/docs/app/developer-docs/contributing/get-started/page.mdx have been corrected to relative paths, there are still absolute links present in CONTRIBUTING.md:
CONTRIBUTING.md:1contains absolute paths to Gitpod and Codespaces.
Please update these links to use relative paths to ensure consistent navigation within the documentation.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Link corrections resolve redirect issues.
The updated links for Gitpod and GitHub Codespaces now use relative paths, which should resolve the redirect issues mentioned in the PR objectives. This change improves the navigation within the developer documentation.
To ensure these links are working correctly, please run the following verification script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the linked pages and check for any remaining absolute paths.
# Test 1: Check if the linked pages exist
fd -e mdx -p "developer-docs/contributing/(gitpod|codespaces)" || echo "Error: One or both of the linked pages are missing."
# Test 2: Search for any remaining absolute paths to these pages
rg "/docs/developer-docs/contributing/(gitpod|codespaces)" || echo "No absolute paths found."
Length of output: 477
mattinannt
changed the title
|
Awarding iamitpal: 150 points 🕹️ Well done! Check out your new contribution on oss.gg/iamitpal |
What does this PR do?
I updated the Oveview Page Redirect and Contributing Section Redirects Links in Developer docs.3344
Fixes #3344
How should this be tested?
Checklist
Required
pnpm buildconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated
Summary by CodeRabbit