Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@amirh
Copy link
Contributor

@amirh amirh commented May 28, 2019

Description

This updates the sample to adapt to the ImageStream listener API changes
in flutter/flutter#32936

As we cannot use the new API before it makes it to stable I'm commenting
out the sample for now(if we update it now it won't compile on stable,
and if we leave it as is it breaks CI on master).

Related Issues

Tracking issue: flutter/flutter#33438

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]). This will ensure a smooth and quick review process.

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • My PR includes unit or integration tests for all changed/updated/fixed behaviors (See Contributor Guide).
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • The analyzer (flutter analyze) does not report any problems on my PR.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide.
  • The title of the PR starts with the name of the plugin surrounded by square brackets, e.g. [shared_preferences]
  • I updated pubspec.yaml with an appropriate new version according to the pub versioning philosophy.
  • I updated CHANGELOG.md to add a description of the change.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I am willing to follow-up on review comments in a timely manner.

Breaking Change

Does your PR require plugin users to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

  • Yes, this is a breaking change (please indicate a breaking change in CHANGELOG.md and increment major revision).
  • No, this is not a breaking change.

This updates the sample to adapt to the ImageStream listener API changes
in flutter/flutter#32936

As we cannot use the new API before it makes it to stable I'm commenting
out the sample for now(if we update it now it won't compile on stable,
and if we leave it as is it breaks CI on master).
@amirh amirh requested a review from iskakaushik as a code owner May 28, 2019 17:31
@amirh amirh changed the title Update and comment out the 'set marker icon' sample. [google_maps_flutter] Update and comment out the 'set marker icon' sample. May 28, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@cyanglaz cyanglaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@amirh amirh merged commit 607ecf0 into flutter:master May 28, 2019
@amirh amirh deleted the image_stream branch May 28, 2019 17:58
amirh added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2019
This updates the sample to adapt to the ImageStream listener API changes
in flutter/flutter#32936

This is similar to the change we did to Google Maps in #1640, unfortunately in the firebase_ml_vision case where we commented out the sample that used the ImageStream listener API. Unfortunately in the firebase_ml_vision case, there's no point in the sample without the ImageStream listener(you need it to pick an image), so I'm just updating the sample to the new API knowing that it won't compile on stable until the breaking change makes it there.
julianscheel pushed a commit to jusst-engineering/plugins that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2020
This updates the sample to adapt to the ImageStream listener API changes
in flutter/flutter#32936

This is similar to the change we did to Google Maps in flutter#1640, unfortunately in the firebase_ml_vision case where we commented out the sample that used the ImageStream listener API. Unfortunately in the firebase_ml_vision case, there's no point in the sample without the ImageStream listener(you need it to pick an image), so I'm just updating the sample to the new API knowing that it won't compile on stable until the breaking change makes it there.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants