Skip to content

Conversation

@LongCatIsLooong
Copy link
Contributor

@LongCatIsLooong LongCatIsLooong commented Nov 13, 2019

This reverts commit 9aea03f. The said commit introduced a ~4.5% regression in stock_build_iteration microbenchmark.

Related Issues

#39060
Reopens #23873
Reopens #27744

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]). This will ensure a smooth and quick review process.

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide, including Features we expect every widget to implement.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • The analyzer (flutter analyze --flutter-repo) does not report any problems on my PR.
  • I am willing to follow-up on review comments in a timely manner.

Breaking Change

Does your PR require Flutter developers to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

  • Yes, this is a breaking change (Please read Handling breaking changes). Replace this with a link to the e-mail where you asked for input on this proposed change.
  • No, this is not a breaking change.

@fluttergithubbot fluttergithubbot added the framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels. label Nov 13, 2019
@goderbauer
Copy link
Member

Can you add to the PR description why we are reverting this? Also: If we revert this we will have to re-open the bugs that were closed by that PR.

Also: The change has been part of many releases. I am a little afraid that reverting this fix will break people unexpectedly when they upgrade flutter to a release that contains this revert.

}
}

/// This method can be called to filter the list of available semantic actions,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes in this file should not be reverted, I think. They are fixing another unrelated problem, no?

Copy link
Member

@goderbauer goderbauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

expect(tester.getTopLeft(find.text('Hawaii')), const Offset(-100.0, 0.0));
});

testWidgets(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this one a test case that's worth keeping since this is expected to work in either implementation?

@LongCatIsLooong LongCatIsLooong merged commit 851d699 into flutter:master Nov 15, 2019
@LongCatIsLooong LongCatIsLooong deleted the revert-37024 branch November 15, 2019 01:14
LongCatIsLooong added a commit to LongCatIsLooong/flutter that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 3, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants