Skip to content

Conversation

@albertusdev
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR is a follow up of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/42640/files
Some changes of that PR includes redundant changes using FlutterError.fromParts constructor even though it's not necessary
Some minor changes are:

  • Remove one unnecessary todo
  • Fix indent consistencies

Related Issues

none

Tests

  • minor changes that was covered by tests included in the previous change

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]). This will ensure a smooth and quick review process.

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide, including Features we expect every widget to implement.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • The analyzer (flutter analyze --flutter-repo) does not report any problems on my PR.
  • I am willing to follow-up on review comments in a timely manner.

Breaking Change

Does your PR require Flutter developers to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

  • Yes, this is a breaking change (Please read Handling breaking changes). Replace this with a link to the e-mail where you asked for input on this proposed change.
  • No, this is not a breaking change.

@albertusdev albertusdev requested review from Hixie and jacob314 October 29, 2019 03:51
@albertusdev albertusdev self-assigned this Oct 29, 2019
@fluttergithubbot fluttergithubbot added a: tests "flutter test", flutter_test, or one of our tests f: cupertino flutter/packages/flutter/cupertino repository f: material design flutter/packages/flutter/material repository. framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels. labels Oct 29, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@jacob314 jacob314 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm
Thanks for cleaning this up.

@gspencergoog
Copy link
Contributor

@adalberht, are you still planning on landing this PR? It has been approved, but needs to have the file conflicts resolved.

@albertusdev albertusdev force-pushed the flutter-error-consistency branch 2 times, most recently from 72e7bd2 to 24cba57 Compare February 20, 2020 04:49
Albertus Angga Raharja and others added 2 commits February 20, 2020 20:24
@albertusdev albertusdev force-pushed the flutter-error-consistency branch from 0168273 to b1364a6 Compare February 20, 2020 13:28
@albertusdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

albertusdev commented Feb 20, 2020

Hey @gspencergoog, this PR should be ready to be landed once the CI is green now.
Earlier the CI kept failing because I used merge instead of rebase and that caused the version SDK to be stuck at 1.10 instead of the latest version.
Also, I added another commit to fix linter warning (unnecessary string interpolation).

@gspencergoog
Copy link
Contributor

Great, I'll land it!

@gspencergoog gspencergoog merged commit aad941e into flutter:master Feb 20, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 1, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

a: tests "flutter test", flutter_test, or one of our tests f: cupertino flutter/packages/flutter/cupertino repository f: material design flutter/packages/flutter/material repository. framework flutter/packages/flutter repository. See also f: labels.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants