Skip to content

Conversation

@srawlins
Copy link
Contributor

@srawlins srawlins commented Jun 30, 2019

Description

This is necessary for those who wish to comply with static analysis like strict-raw-types: true, which includes generated code within their package. strict-raw-types disallows declarations like StreamChannel channel where upper-bound type arguments are inferred, in this case dynamic.

Related Issues

none

Tests

I added no tests.

Checklist

Before you create this PR confirm that it meets all requirements listed below by checking the relevant checkboxes ([x]). This will ensure a smooth and quick review process.

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I signed the CLA.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide, including Features we expect every widget to implement.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • All existing and new tests are passing.
  • The analyzer (flutter analyze --flutter-repo) does not report any problems on my PR.
  • I am willing to follow-up on review comments in a timely manner.

Breaking Change

Does your PR require Flutter developers to manually update their apps to accommodate your change?

  • Yes, this is a breaking change (Please read Handling breaking changes). Replace this with a link to the e-mail where you asked for input on this proposed change.
  • No, this is not a breaking change.

This is necessary for those who wish to comply with static analysis like
`strict-raw-types: true`, which includes generated code within their package.
@Piinks Piinks added the tool Affects the "flutter" command-line tool. See also t: labels. label Jul 1, 2019
Copy link
Member

@goderbauer goderbauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@jonahwilliams jonahwilliams left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@goderbauer goderbauer merged commit 5b6ebf1 into flutter:master Jul 3, 2019
tango5614 added a commit to tango5614/flutter that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2019
* commit 'a0c47e2216a2b50b70c478001cf5652f31a783af': (187 commits)
  Do not use ideographic baseline for RenderPargraph baseline (flutter#35493)
  Add type to StreamChannel in generated test code. (flutter#35367)
  Fix RenderFittedBox when child.size.isEmpty (flutter#35487)
  add APK build time benchmarks (flutter#35481)
  fix Selection handles position is off (flutter#34665)
  Move usage flutter create tests into memory filesystem. (flutter#35160)
  Include tags in SemanticsNode debug properties (flutter#35491)
  Re-apply 'Add currentSystemFrameTimeStamp to SchedulerBinding' (flutter#35492)
  CupertinoTextField vertical alignment (flutter#34723)
  Mark update-packages as non-experimental (flutter#35467)
  fix default artifacts to exclude ios and android (flutter#35303)
  Roll engine ffba2f6..7d3e722 (59 commits) (flutter#35489)
  Update macrobenchmarks README and app name (flutter#35477)
  mark windows and macos chrome dev mode as flaky (flutter#35495)
  Use the new service protocol message names (flutter#35482)
  Manual roll of engine 45b66b7...ffba2f6 (flutter#35464)
  more ui-as-code (flutter#35393)
  update reassemble doc (flutter#35164)
  New parameter for RawGestureDetector to customize semantics mapping (flutter#33936)
  Add --target support for Windows and Linux (flutter#34660)
  ...
johnsonmh pushed a commit to johnsonmh/flutter that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2019
This is necessary for those who wish to comply with static analysis like
`strict-raw-types: true`, which includes generated code within their package.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 5, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

tool Affects the "flutter" command-line tool. See also t: labels.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants