-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
Text field height attempt 2 #29250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Text field height attempt 2 #29250
Conversation
|
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
See #27205 for confirming CLA. |
|
The bug that was causing the image comparison tests to fail was that my new layout algorithm was adding a subtext gap below the subtext when the old one wasn't. My fix is to remove that extra subtext gap. So originally and after my fix, the parent container ends immediately after any subtext with no spacing (see screenshot below). I think this is best because there is also no spacing when there is no subtext at all. Any desired spacing will be up to the user. The same thing with spacing after the subtext looked like this. This is no longer the behavior with my fix. |
|
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
a3654f6 to
955e384
Compare
|
Another bug for other image comparison tests was related to I also didn't lay it out when I should have in a few other cases, which was fixed with the above. |
|
A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good. (Googler, please make sure the reason for overriding the CLA status is clearly documented in these comments.) ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
|
@HansMuller This is ready for review. You've already reviewed this PR when it went in the first time, but now I've added five new commits, starting with f276609. The new things that I've done are:
|
HansMuller
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The new changes LGTM, please take this PR in for a landing!



See #27205
Attempting to get that PR in again after it was reverted due to breaking internal tests after the roll.