Repository navigation
Fix supports_decal check in framebuffer_blend.frag - #196227
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request modifies the framebuffer_blend.frag shader to check if supports_decal > 0.0 instead of > 1 to ensure correct behavior when hardware decal is supported, and adds a corresponding unit test in aiks_dl_blend_unittests.cc. The review feedback suggests adding assertions to ensure that created device buffers and readback contents are not null before they are accessed in the test, and recommends using supports_decal > 0.5 in the shader to avoid potential floating-point precision issues.
|
Golden file changes have been found for this pull request. Click here to view and triage (e.g. because this is an intentional change). If you are still iterating on this change and are not ready to resolve the images on the Flutter Gold dashboard, consider marking this PR as a draft pull request above. You will still be able to view image results on the dashboard, commenting will be silenced, and the check will not try to resolve itself until marked ready for review. For more guidance, visit Writing a golden file test for Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. |
|
Golden file changes are available for triage from new commit, Click here to view. For more guidance, visit Writing a golden file test for Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. |
gaaclarke
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you link an issue in the description please =)
Done! |
gaaclarke
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't find that the provided test or golden changes provide a clear demonstration of correct behavior. I worry that we don't have an appropriate backstop for this change.
Also, Gemini suggest that while the branch was dead code it locked in desirable behavior. It made it so DrawImage with kScreen and kSrcOver have the same sharpness. It recommends keeping the old bias:
if (supports_decal > 0.0) {
return texture(texture_sampler, texture_coords, kDefaultMipBias);
}The bot also suggests that drawing those 2 things side by side will be a good golden test to show that they have the same crispness. I'm not sure how easy that will be to actually see, but worth a try.
Can we land a PR before this that enables malioc for this shader so we can show that this is an improvement?
Comments in the build files indicate that we can't? |
| // Mip 0 (8x8) is transparent black (0); mip 1 (4x4) is opaque white (255). | ||
| // Drawing at 0.5x scale selects LOD = 1.0 (white) when framebuffer_blend.frag | ||
| // takes the unbiased hardware decal path (`supports_decal > 0.0`). With the | ||
| // old `supports_decal > 1` check, `1.0 > 1` was false and `IPSampleDecal` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
old will only get older after this PR lands. Can you link to the "before" hash/line for future code archivists?
jtmcdole
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm, assuming Aaron doesn't have anything else.
|
Welp. Our bots agree with each other. #196343 seems to work. |
…ter#196343) Analyze framebuffer_blend with malioc. For review comment flutter#196227 (review) ## Pre-launch Checklist - [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs. - [x] I read the [AI contribution guidelines] and understand my responsibilities, or I am not using AI tools. - [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities. - [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement]. - [x] I signed the [CLA]. - [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above. - [x] I updated/added relevant in-code documentation (doc comments with `///`). - [x] If this PR introduces a new feature or capability, I created and linked a website documentation issue or PR in [flutter/website] (or verified none is needed). - [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is [test-exempt]. - [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven Fixes] where supported. - [x] All existing and new tests are passing. If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on [Discord]. If this change needs to override an active code freeze, provide a comment explaining why. The code freeze workflow can be overridden by code reviewers. See pinned issues for any active code freezes with guidance. **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. <!-- Links --> [Contributor Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview [AI contribution guidelines]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.ai.md [Tree Hygiene]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md [test-exempt]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests [Flutter Style Guide]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md [Features we expect every widget to implement]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement [CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/ [flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests [flutter/website]: https://github.com/flutter/website [breaking change policy]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes [Discord]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md [Data Driven Fixes]: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
fa5cb29 to
cbd566a
Compare
|
It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests or get an explicit test exemption before merging. If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix? Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. If both you and the PR author believe this PR qualifies for a test exemption, escalate to the tech lead for the changed area to review and apply the |
|
Changed to: Malioc diff is here: https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8665389924786194881/+/u/test:_malioc_diff/stdout Everything appears to be moving in the right direction except two things Gemini says don't matter:
|
yea those are fine |
cbd566a to
971b1af
Compare
|
Golden file changes are available for triage from new commit, Click here to view. For more guidance, visit Writing a golden file test for Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. |
|
The golden diffs are expected: IPSampleDecal vs. hardware SamplerAddressMode::kDecal at v = 1.001984:
|
gaaclarke
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm!
test-exempt: improvement in static performance evaluation
|
auto label is removed for flutter/flutter/196227, Failed to enqueue flutter/flutter/196227 with HTTP 400: Pull request Required status check "Check Code Freeze" is queued.. |
…13653) Manual roll Flutter from 9c427b5d7b1c to 1b9585481095 (32 revisions) Manual roll requested by [email protected] flutter/flutter@9c427b5...1b95854 2026-11-13 [email protected] Roll pub packages (flutter/flutter#196541) 2026-11-13 [email protected] Do not route PRs for review without cla, convert to draft (flutter/flutter#196341) 2026-11-13 [email protected] Roll Skia from d87a6c04da74 to 11f46cfe8838 (13 revisions) (flutter/flutter#196533) 2026-11-13 [email protected] [flutter_tools, flutter_test] Deprecate --experimental-faster-testing (flutter/flutter#196123) 2026-11-13 [email protected] [flutter_tools] Handle RPCError in ScreenshotCommand.runSkia (flutter/flutter#196132) 2026-11-13 [email protected] Roll Dart SDK from a8b961fd48bb to c91e8b6674e2 (2 revisions) (flutter/flutter#196502) 2026-11-13 [email protected] Roll Skia from 0c5ce4960cef to d87a6c04da74 (12 revisions) (flutter/flutter#196497) 2026-11-13 [email protected] Don't call `skia_image()` for raster-owned images in `DlImage::Equals` (flutter/flutter#196473) 2026-11-13 [email protected] [flutter_tools] Require FlutterCommandRunner DI fields and extract findCommandName (flutter/flutter#196331) 2026-11-13 [email protected] [web] Unify ui.Canvas behind a shared EngineCanvas frontend (flutter/flutter#196348) 2026-11-13 [email protected] Link to MediaQuery.displayFeaturesOf from DisplayFeatures (flutter/flutter#193728) 2026-11-13 [email protected] Removes reference to unnecessary ensureSemantics call in doc (flutter/flutter#195831) 2026-11-13 [email protected] [flutter_tools] Register trackWidgetCreation in AppleBuildOptionsBundle (flutter/flutter#196078) 2026-11-12 [email protected] [Android] Skip the HardwareBuffer defect fallback for platform views (flutter/flutter#193441) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Fix supports_decal check in framebuffer_blend.frag (flutter/flutter#196227) 2026-11-12 [email protected] [ios] Update the screen in didUpdateEffectiveGeometry (flutter/flutter#195508) 2026-11-12 [email protected] [flutter_tools] Add `Cache-Control` headers for web test assets (flutter/flutter#196414) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Roll Skia from 3b71ec08218f to 0c5ce4960cef (16 revisions) (flutter/flutter#196472) 2026-11-12 [email protected] [web] Render bounded ImageFilter.blur on wimp (flutter/flutter#196081) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Roll Dart SDK from 69567bd3c427 to a8b961fd48bb (2 revisions) (flutter/flutter#196464) 2026-11-12 [email protected] [engine] Release the Skia OpenGL resource context on shutdown (flutter/flutter#193592) 2026-11-12 [email protected] [web] Fix decoding of still AVIF images on Chrome (flutter/flutter#195958) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Gate SurfaceControl context setting on API 34+ (flutter/flutter#196394) 2026-11-12 [email protected] [flutter_tools] Only pass on a valid root tool in DASH__TOOL (flutter/flutter#196228) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Support GL_TEXTURE_EXTERNAL_OES embedder textures in Impeller (flutter/flutter#195857) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Stop building linux/wasm_release in local_engine_builds (flutter/flutter#196345) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Split flame out of Linux customer_testing (flutter/flutter#196347) 2026-11-12 Jiwon Lee [Windows] Fix Space input after Alt+Space with previous Microsoft IME (flutter/flutter#192105) 2026-11-12 [email protected] [flutter_tools] Add ToolExtensionException, exit() guard, graceful shutdown, and base modifiers (flutter/flutter#195908) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Roll Packages from 653628e to 14f9933 (9 revisions) (flutter/flutter#196450) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Roll Dart SDK from e5add7a25b32 to 69567bd3c427 (2 revisions) (flutter/flutter#196437) 2026-11-12 [email protected] Roll Skia from 9aa2513a4ac9 to 3b71ec08218f (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#196436) If this roll has caused a breakage, revert this CL and set the roller to dry run mode using the controls here: https://autoroll.skia.org/r/flutter-packages Please CC [email protected],[email protected] on the revert to ensure that a human is aware of the problem. To file a bug in Packages: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/new/choose To report a problem with the AutoRoller itself, please file a bug: https://issues.skia.org/issues/new?component=1389291&template=1850622 ...

The callers of this shader only ever pass 0.0 or 1.0 for supports_decal, so prior to this change
supports_decal > 1was always false. Even when the hardware sampler was configured withSamplerAddressMode::kDecal, the shader always took the fallback branch and calledIPSampleDecal.Prior to this change, a user-visible difference could only occur when all of the following happen at once:
TextureContents::RenderToSnapshot's passthrough fast-path.FilterQuality.medium.Fixes #196266
Pre-launch Checklist
///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.
If this change needs to override an active code freeze, provide a comment explaining why. The code freeze workflow can be overridden by code reviewers. See pinned issues for any active code freezes with guidance.
Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of Gemini Code Assist for GitHub. Comments from the
gemini-code-assistbot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed.