Skip to content

Conversation

@sigmundch
Copy link
Contributor

This changes the ddm builds to be part of the merge queue so they are available on every commit and can be used for internal testing.

To be honest, I can't recall the meaning of bringup, but I updated it together with backfill to match what I see in the other ci configurations. Let me know if those changes still make sense or if we should do something else here.

cc @jiahaog @jtmcdole

b/393719931

Pre-launch Checklist

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

@sigmundch sigmundch requested a review from matanlurey May 2, 2025 19:02
@github-actions github-actions bot added the engine flutter/engine related. See also e: labels. label May 2, 2025
@jtmcdole
Copy link
Member

jtmcdole commented May 2, 2025

"bringup: true" means "use non-prod" - so removing that is the correct thing.

Copy link
Member

@jtmcdole jtmcdole left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

infrastructure bridge sunset outrun 2 lgtm_640_24

@sigmundch sigmundch enabled auto-merge May 2, 2025 21:24
@sigmundch sigmundch added this pull request to the merge queue May 2, 2025
Merged via the queue into flutter:master with commit 8cffc5a May 2, 2025
179 of 180 checks passed
@sigmundch sigmundch deleted the ddm_in_merge_queue branch May 2, 2025 22:48
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 3, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 3, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 4, 2025
@zanderso
Copy link
Member

zanderso commented May 5, 2025

DBC

The prod build has not yet shown up on the dashboard. Is it correctly running in the merge queue?

@sigmundch
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh weird. And using bring-up in the dashboard shows only the old builds before my PR.

@matanlurey @jtmcdole - any clues?

@sigmundch
Copy link
Contributor Author

For what it's worth, I do see them running in LUCI

@jtmcdole
Copy link
Member

jtmcdole commented May 5, 2025

We're talking about this in chat already and investigating

@matanlurey
Copy link
Contributor

tl;dr: It's correct they are not showing up.

See #168323.

engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
mboetger pushed a commit to mboetger/flutter that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
This changes the ddm builds to be part of the merge queue so they are
available on every commit and can be used for internal testing.

To be honest, I can't recall the meaning of bringup, but I updated it
together with backfill to match what I see in the other ci
configurations. Let me know if those changes still make sense or if we
should do something else here.

cc @jiahaog @jtmcdole 

b/393719931


## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [ ] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].

<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md

Co-authored-by: Sigmund Cherem < [email protected]>
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2025
Similar to #168233, but this time
for iOS
Follow-up to #168717

As we start to work more seriously with ddm we'd like to have these
builds always available instead of on demand only.
danilozhang pushed a commit to danilozhang/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
Similar to flutter#168233, but this time
for iOS
Follow-up to flutter#168717

As we start to work more seriously with ddm we'd like to have these
builds always available instead of on demand only.
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2025
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/packages that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2025
ksokolovskyi pushed a commit to ksokolovskyi/flutter that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2025
Similar to flutter#168233, but this time
for iOS
Follow-up to flutter#168717

As we start to work more seriously with ddm we'd like to have these
builds always available instead of on demand only.
mboetger pushed a commit to mboetger/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
Similar to flutter#168233, but this time
for iOS
Follow-up to flutter#168717

As we start to work more seriously with ddm we'd like to have these
builds always available instead of on demand only.
korca0220 pushed a commit to korca0220/flutter that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
Similar to flutter#168233, but this time
for iOS
Follow-up to flutter#168717

As we start to work more seriously with ddm we'd like to have these
builds always available instead of on demand only.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2025
Follow-up to #177252.
Towards b/452833651.
Similar to #168233.

This changes the ddm host build to be part of the merge queue so they
are available on every commit because we want to use them for internal
testing and use them on CI internally.
flutter-zl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2025
Follow-up to #177252.
Towards b/452833651.
Similar to #168233.

This changes the ddm host build to be part of the merge queue so they
are available on every commit because we want to use them for internal
testing and use them on CI internally.
lucaantonelli pushed a commit to lucaantonelli/flutter that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2025
Similar to flutter#168233, but this time
for iOS
Follow-up to flutter#168717

As we start to work more seriously with ddm we'd like to have these
builds always available instead of on demand only.
reidbaker pushed a commit to AbdeMohlbi/flutter that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
Follow-up to flutter#177252.
Towards b/452833651.
Similar to flutter#168233.

This changes the ddm host build to be part of the merge queue so they
are available on every commit because we want to use them for internal
testing and use them on CI internally.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

engine flutter/engine related. See also e: labels.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants