-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
Added opacity note to withValues docstring
#162612
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
withValues docstring
sethladd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you! lgtm
Piinks
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
autosubmit label was removed for flutter/flutter/162612, because - The status or check suite Linux analyze has failed. Please fix the issues identified (or deflake) before re-applying this label. |
|
Sorry, updated it a couple of times to pass analyzer. I got cocky and thought I had the 1 line of code right using the analyzer in my head. This version I actually double checked against the real analyzer. |
|
That's amazing that we have analysis rules for code in dartdocs! |
|
I'm going to submit this to the merge queue despite the infra failure to schedule tool_integration_tests. This change is only a comment so the only important check was the docstring analyzer when happens in "Linux Analyze" which passed. I've reported the failure to the current gardener. |
|
That doesn't work now that we have the merge queue. I'll try merging master to flush out the failures. There doesn't look like a good alternative. |
issue: #162069
This expands the docstring for
withValues()to help people who are migrating from the old nomenclature.Pre-launch Checklist
///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.