-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
fix: A referenced default package must be a plugin package #152134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ Map<String, List<Plugin>> _resolvePluginImplementations( | |
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| globals.printWarning( | ||
| 'Package ${plugin.name}:$platformKey references $defaultImplPluginName:$platformKey as the default plugin, but the package does not exist.\n' | ||
| 'Package ${plugin.name}:$platformKey references $defaultImplPluginName:$platformKey as the default plugin, but the package does not exist, or is not a plugin package.\n' | ||
| 'Ask the maintainers of ${plugin.name} to either avoid referencing a default implementation via `platforms: $platformKey: default_package: $defaultImplPluginName` ' | ||
| 'or create a plugin named $defaultImplPluginName.\n', | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Let's also change this to "or ensure that $defaultImplPluginName
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See the other comment. |
||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, this may also be slightly wrong. Is this check based on post-platform-filtering, or pre-platform-filtering? I.e., if
$defaultImplPluginNameexists, and is a plugin package, but does not have aflutter:plugin:platforms:entry forplatformKey, will we still hit this codepath?If so, we need to rephrase to "or is not a plugin package that provides a $platformKey implementation."
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@stuartmorgan
This check involves all plugins, which have this condition. So it's pre-platform-filtering. Means, all with the
flutter: plugin:in the pubspec are considered. So I think the error message is correct that way.We test the specific platform implementation a few lines above, which should cover your mentioned case (if I understood your concern right): https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/152134/files#diff-68361f6fc9aafa5fa7de042eec4603dd4f321eb783a00edd57780ef78c1094bbR1259
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, thanks. Ideally the check should be stricter and require a platform implementation, but we can revisit that if it ever actually matters in practice.