-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
[CP] Update vm_snapshot_analysis to 0.7.6 on stable #133657
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CP] Update vm_snapshot_analysis to 0.7.6 on stable #133657
Conversation
|
This pull request was opened from and to a release candidate branch. This should only be done as part of the official Flutter release process. If you are attempting to make a regular contribution to the Flutter project, please close this PR and follow the instructions at Tree Hygiene for detailed instructions on contributing to Flutter. Reviewers: Use caution before merging pull requests to release branches. Ensure the proper procedure has been followed. |
| path: 1.8.3 | ||
| process: 4.2.4 | ||
| vm_snapshot_analysis: 0.7.2 | ||
| vm_snapshot_analysis: 0.7.6 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given this is bumping from 0.7.2 -> 0.7.6, I'm guessing it's picking up other changes than the fix? Can you publish a special hotfix release of vm_snapshot_analysis, like a version 0.7.2+1, that way we can minimize the diff in the Flutter SDK?
I'll be writing up a pub dependency cherrypick to Flutter SDK playbook so that hopefully in the future there will be a clear steps to do this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All the non-dev versions from 0.7.2 to 0.7.6 were to address the null check failures in 0.7.2, so 0.7.2+1 would basically be the exact same package. I can do that if desired, but it seems a bit silly to do so.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ahh, ok, this sounds good to me then
christopherfujino
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
Hmm, @CaseyHillers do you know why the ci.yaml check is failing? https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/133657/checks?check_run_id=16343588795 it looks to me like the branching is correct. |
There's some weird issue where GitHub doesn't send the right ref. I clicked rerun, which should fix the issue. |
Partially cherry picks 3b8f6c4, in particular it only performs the update of
vm_snapshot_analysisto 0.7.6.Issues fixed:
Pre-launch Checklist
///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.