Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@ColdPaleLight
Copy link
Member

@ColdPaleLight ColdPaleLight commented Jun 23, 2022

fix flutter/flutter#100176

Pre-launch Checklist

  • I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
  • I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide] and the [C++, Objective-C, Java style guides].
  • I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
  • I added new tests to check the change I am making or feature I am adding, or Hixie said the PR is test-exempt. See [testing the engine] for instructions on
    writing and running engine tests.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • I signed the [CLA].
  • All existing and new tests are passing.

@ColdPaleLight ColdPaleLight requested review from chinmaygarde and flar and removed request for flar June 23, 2022 09:43
Copy link
Contributor

@flar flar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@chinmaygarde chinmaygarde added waiting for tree to go green This PR is approved and tested, but waiting for the tree to be green to land. autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App labels Jun 23, 2022
@auto-submit auto-submit bot merged commit a9c6233 into flutter:main Jun 23, 2022
engine-flutter-autoroll added a commit to engine-flutter-autoroll/flutter that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

autosubmit Merge PR when tree becomes green via auto submit App waiting for tree to go green This PR is approved and tested, but waiting for the tree to be green to land.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DisplayList DispatchHelpers should protect against extra restore calls

3 participants