reland #31875
revert #32370
added commit d685191

In the RasterizeLayer method, we must use different paint_bounds according to different RasterCacheLayerStrategy

• In the case of kLayer, we use paint_bounds of layer
• In the case of kLayerChildren, we use origin_child_paint_bounds of container_layer

const SkRect& RasterCache::GetPaintBoundsFromLayer(
    Layer* layer,
    RasterCacheLayerStrategy strategy) const {
  switch (strategy) {
    case RasterCacheLayerStrategy::kLayer:
      return layer->paint_bounds();
    case RasterCacheLayerStrategy::kLayerChildren:
      FML_DCHECK(layer->as_container_layer());
      return layer->as_container_layer()->origin_child_paint_bounds();
  }
}

Issue flutter/flutter#101152 occurs because the paint_bounds are not correct, resulting in abnormal rendering (when running the test locally I found that the display and animation of the test are not correct). And worst_frame_rasterizer_time_millis is longer than normal.

After fixing this issue, worst_frame_rasterizer_time_millis of test color_filter_and_fade_perf_test was reduced from 140ms to 105ms on my test device (Nexus 6P, Android 8.1.0)

cc @flar
fyi @zanderso

Pre-launch Checklist

• I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
• I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
• I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide] and the [C++, Objective-C, Java style guides].
• I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
• I added new tests to check the change I am making or feature I am adding, or Hixie said the PR is test-exempt. See [testing the engine] for instructions on
  writing and running engine tests.
• I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
• I signed the [CLA].
• All existing and new tests are passing.