Skip to content

[Quarterly Review]: Q4 2026 Partner Team Verification Audit #11

Open

Description

@Piinks

Quarterly Partner Team Verification Audit (Q4 2026)

Audit date: November 4, 2026
Audit quarter: Q4 2026
Target team: @flutter/partners
Proposed roster & report PR: #9
Governance reference: docs/QUARTERLY_REVIEW.md • docs/GOVERNANCE.md

Part of flutter/flutter#186415

This issue tracks quarterly verification for @flutter/partners.
The audit facilitator reaches out to each partner organization to confirm active participation for the members below.

Active partner team members

Contributor Partner team Role 12m activity snapshot Status verification
@knopp @flutter/canonical Maintainer 18 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@mattkae @flutter/canonical Maintainer 51 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@paul-geoghegan @flutter/canonical Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@robert-ancell @flutter/canonical Maintainer 33 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@Saviq @flutter/canonical Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@danielleon-cmd @flutter/cloudsufi Maintainer 5 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@ronit-cloudsufi @flutter/cloudsufi Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@victogomez-cs @flutter/cloudsufi Maintainer 15 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@jokerttu @flutter/codemate Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@mikaelkomu @flutter/codemate Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@samuli-codemate @flutter/codemate Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@utopicnarwhal @flutter/codemate Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@bdero @flutter/flutter_gpu Maintainer 35 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@DanTup @flutter/partners Maintainer 23 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@Hixie @flutter/partners Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@parlough @flutter/partners Maintainer 146 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@schultek @flutter/partners Maintainer 3 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@mbcorona @flutter/tcs Maintainer 10 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@preethi0228-git @flutter/tcs Maintainer 23 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@puneetkukreja98 @flutter/tcs Maintainer 2 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@saurabh-mirajkar @flutter/tcs Maintainer 2 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@suryaKommana2662 @flutter/tcs Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@Dipakkumarjena @flutter/techm Maintainer 1 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@dkbharti-glitch @flutter/techm Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@mmohankrishna-lab @flutter/techm Maintainer 7 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@muralikrishmt @flutter/techm Maintainer 0 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@danxorzum @flutter/virtusa Maintainer 6 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@juan-mora-google @flutter/virtusa Maintainer 9 contributions [ ] Verified Active
@ranbeuer @flutter/virtusa Maintainer 14 contributions [ ] Verified Active

Departures and offboarding

If any listed engineer has concluded their engagement with the partners team:

  1. Confirm offboarding to revoke @flutter/partners write access.
  2. If the departing engineer remains an active open-source contributor, specify their community ladder placement (Committer or Reviewer).
  • All partner memberships confirmed with partner organizations.

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Nov 4, 2026
  2. kenzieschmoll commented on Nov 4, 2026

    @kenzieschmoll
    Member

    One note about the contributors from Codemate - the table lists contributions at 0 but this is incorrect. All their recent contributions have been to the private dash-evals repo so maybe the query is not capturing that. Not sure if this matters, but just wanted to flag.

  3. Piinks commented on Nov 4, 2026

    @Piinks
    CollaboratorAuthor

    One note about the contributors from Codemate - the table lists contributions at 0 but this is incorrect. All their recent contributions have been to the private dash-evals repo so maybe the query is not capturing that. Not sure if this matters, but just wanted to flag.

    Thanks @kenzieschmoll! As members of the partners group, contributions are not counted. They are committed partners, sometimes contributing in ways that are not measured in public PRs and such. Can you confirm all Codemate members are accurate?

  4. Piinks commented on Nov 4, 2026

    @Piinks
    CollaboratorAuthor
  5. Piinks commented on Nov 5, 2026

    @Piinks
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Confirmed all partners from TechM.

  6. kenzieschmoll commented on Nov 6, 2026

    @kenzieschmoll
    Member

    One note about the contributors from Codemate - the table lists contributions at 0 but this is incorrect. All their recent contributions have been to the private dash-evals repo so maybe the query is not capturing that. Not sure if this matters, but just wanted to flag.

    Thanks [@kenzieschmoll](https://github.com/kenzieschmoll)! As members of the partners group, contributions are not counted. They are committed partners, sometimes contributing in ways that are not measured in public PRs and such. Can you confirm all Codemate members are accurate?

    Thanks for the explanation. Yes, all Codemate members are accurate.

  7. github-actions commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    Weekly review period status update

    [Quarterly Review]: Q4 2026 Partner Team Verification Audit is currently in the 30-day review and grace period:

    • Elapsed: 4 day(s) (opened 2026-11-04)
    • Remaining: 26 day(s) until the 30-day review window concludes on 2026-12-04

    If you were tagged above and have not yet replied, please comment on this thread before 2026-12-04 to accept your invitation, share your Discord username for team member role provisioning, or share qualitative contributions (issue triage, reproductions, RFCs, design docs, or mentoring).

  8. DanTup commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @DanTup

    If you were tagged above and have not yet replied, please comment on this thread before 2026-12-04 to accept your invitation

    @Piinks it's not clear to me if I was supposed to do anything here. The original comment said "The audit facilitator reaches out to each partner organization", but this bot comment make it seem like we should be responding here if we were tagged.

    (my company has an active contract with Google, I'm still contributing, and my Discord username is @DanTup which already has roles)

  9. Piinks commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @Piinks
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Thanks @DanTup! Definitely applying some polish to the workflows here going through them the first time. For partner audit, yes the facilitator manages instead of expecting folks to reply. Thanks for flagging!

  10. Hixie commented on Nov 10, 2026

    @Hixie

    I'm still around! Though pretty much my only contribution these days is to run the bot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

partner-auditPartner Team Verification Auditquarterly-reviewQuarterly Contributor Ladder Review

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions