Skip to content

Can't access element attributes by array index #27

Closed

Description

@fortes

I'm having issues iterating over the list of attributes on an element. Here's sample code:

domino = require('domino');

window = domino.createWindow("<h1 lang='en'>Hello</h1>");
h1 = window.document.body.firstChild;

// Outputs 1
console.log(h1.attributes.length);
// Returns undefined, expected an object
console.log(h1.attributes[0]);

Activity

  1. cscott commented on Apr 5, 2013

    @cscott
    Collaborator
    h1.attributes.item(0)

    should work fine. The attributes array is very hard to emulate in pure JavaScript; we'd need to use ES6 proxies in order to implement direct array access to attributes. See https://github.com/andreasgal/dom.js/blob/master/src/impl/Element.js#L241 for a long description of why exactly DOM attributes are hard.

  2. fortes commented on Apr 5, 2013

    @fortes
    ContributorAuthor

    @cscott Understood, and I was already using that workaround, filed just in case. How are you able to get around this for childNodes and other collections?

  3. cscott commented on Apr 5, 2013

    @cscott
    Collaborator

    See https://github.com/fgnass/domino/blob/master/lib/NodeList.js (for example). We return an actual JavaScript array with an item() method added. This works when the single array can be the canonical storage for the values. Attributes are a funny case because they are mirrored and reflected all over the place, as described in that link above.

    That said, it seems like it might be possible to re-engineer the representation of attributes such that Element.attributes is the One True Place to find attribute information, rewriting all the other ways to access attributes to use it. This would be a pretty invasive change, though, and if users tried to mutate the attributes array directly (in theory it is read-only, but in practice it would have to be writable) then Bad Things would happen.

  4. fortes commented on Apr 5, 2013

    @fortes
    ContributorAuthor

    Understood. Thanks for the explanation.

  5. cscott commented on Apr 9, 2013

    @cscott
    Collaborator

    I'm leaving this bug open to remind me to add a note to the documentation explaining that array accesses on Element.attributes are not supported (use .item() instead).

  6. cscott commented on Feb 14, 2018

    @cscott
    Collaborator

    If we ever bump the node minimum version to >= 6 (it's currently >= 4) then we could actually use ES6 proxies for attributes...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions