Blanket: terminal output distinguishes annotated functions#2267
Merged
bors-ferrocene[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom Apr 3, 2026
Merged
Blanket: terminal output distinguishes annotated functions#2267bors-ferrocene[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bors-ferrocene[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Before, this was possible to distinguish in the generated HTML doc, but hard to figure out from CI logs.
Hoverbear
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2026
Member
|
bors merge |
bors-ferrocene Bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2026
2265: blanket: Report all unused annotations at once r=Hoverbear a=jyn514 Cherry-picked from #2180. 2266: Fix `-C metadata` documentation r=Hoverbear a=jyn514 Fixes #8. Our docs: https://public-docs.ferrocene.dev/main/user-manual/rustc/cli.html#um_rustc_C_metadata Upstream's docs: https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/codegen-options/index.html#metadata 2267: Blanket: terminal output distinguishes annotated functions r=Hoverbear a=jyn514 Before, this was possible to distinguish in the generated HTML doc, but hard to figure out from CI logs. I verified locally that running `x test --coverage=library` shows the same output for fully/partially/untested in the terminal as shown in the HTML. Co-authored-by: Jynn Nelson <[email protected]>
Contributor
|
Build failed (retrying...):
|
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before, this was possible to distinguish in the generated HTML doc, but hard to figure out from CI logs.
I verified locally that running
x test --coverage=libraryshows the same output for fully/partially/untested in the terminal as shown in the HTML.