Dev Images are failing to build

Expected Behavior

Dev images should pass

Current Behavior

Dev Images are failing

Steps to reproduce

Adding docling + PyTorch made the GA run out of disk space.

Possible Solution

@ntkathole

FYI @ntkathole https://github.com/feast-dev/feast/actions/runs/13567600791/job/37924135982

recent addition of pytorch appears problematic ... adding at least 755mb

Downloading torch-2.2.2-cp311-cp311-manylinux1_x86_64.whl (755.6 MB)

Yeah, it's big. So we want to keep pytorch and docling but we need to free up disk space. Probably there may be some other options outside of removing those packages.

@franciscojavierarceo

@franciscojavierarceo will see what i can figure out

@franciscojavierarceo

@franciscojavierarceo the pytorch additions have ballooned the dev image size to nearly 9gb -

$ podman images
REPOSITORY                                  TAG         IMAGE ID      CREATED        SIZE
localhost/feastdev/feature-server           dev         855c0c7f8cbd  2 minutes ago  8.92 GB

What was it before?

But this is a generally known thing FWIW.

@franciscojavierarceo

@franciscojavierarceo previously it was just over 3gb -

$ podman images
REPOSITORY                                  TAG         IMAGE ID      CREATED        SIZE
localhost/feastdev/feature-server           dev         1acbedb677e5  4 seconds ago  3.35 GB

makes sense!

@franciscojavierarceo

@franciscojavierarceo my previous comment was showing you how large it used to be. i've yet to figure out how to reduce it from 9gb since the pytorch changes. still trying a few things

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Dev Images are failing to build #5108

Expected Behavior

Current Behavior

Steps to reproduce

Possible Solution

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Dev Images are failing to build #5108

Description

Expected Behavior

Current Behavior

Steps to reproduce

Possible Solution

Activity

franciscojavierarceo commented on Feb 28, 2025

tchughesiv commented on Mar 3, 2025

franciscojavierarceo commented on Mar 3, 2025

tchughesiv commented on Mar 3, 2025

tchughesiv commented on Mar 3, 2025

franciscojavierarceo commented on Mar 3, 2025

franciscojavierarceo commented on Mar 3, 2025

tchughesiv commented on Mar 3, 2025

franciscojavierarceo commented on Mar 3, 2025

tchughesiv commented on Mar 3, 2025

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions