Skip to content

🔒️ Add strict_content_type checking for JSON requests#14978

Merged
tiangolo merged 7 commits intomasterfrom
strict-content-type
Feb 23, 2026
Merged

🔒️ Add strict_content_type checking for JSON requests#14978
tiangolo merged 7 commits intomasterfrom
strict-content-type

Conversation

@tiangolo
Copy link
Member

🔒️ Add strict_content_type checking for JSON requests

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 23, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 20 untouched benchmarks


Comparing strict-content-type (6b6c648) with master (248d7fb)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on master (94a1ee7) during the generation of this report, so 248d7fb was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@tiangolo tiangolo marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2026 17:45
@tiangolo tiangolo merged commit 22354a2 into master Feb 23, 2026
42 of 43 checks passed
@tiangolo tiangolo deleted the strict-content-type branch February 23, 2026 17:45
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gracias

bcollet added a commit to bcollet/step-ca-inspector that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2026
…content-type for SCEP challenge verifications
bcollet added a commit to bcollet/step-ca-inspector that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants