📝 Docs preview for commit 16f352b at: https://b927d9bc.fastapitiangolo.pages.dev

📝 Docs preview for commit 39f2ebc at: https://384c2bce.fastapitiangolo.pages.dev

NOTE: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/alternatives/#starlette
– ASGI hover reads "The new standard for building asynchronous Python web" – shouldn't it end with "applications" or it is left like this intentionally?

Looks like "plug-ins" is used across the docs, and it is a common plural form in general.

P.S.: somebody with native English please check the next paragraph, namely "way that allow" – shouldn't there be "allowS" (or "will allow" alternatively)?

Yeah, should be way that allows. Can you make that change too ?

Looks like "plug-ins" is used across the docs, and it is a common plural form in general.
P.S.: somebody with native English please check the next paragraph, namely "way that allow" – shouldn't there be "allowS" (or "will allow" alternatively)?

Yeah, should be way that allows. Can you make that change too ?

Done:339e5bc

Nice, thank you @s111d! 🔍

And thanks for the reviews @hasansezertasan, @alejsdev 🙇

NOTE: fastapi.tiangolo.com/alternatives/#starlette
– ASGI hover reads "The new standard for building asynchronous Python web" – shouldn't it end with "applications" or it is left like this intentionally?

This was intentional, thinking that it would refer to both application frameworks and servers, but it makes sense that it sounds clearer with "applications" there, I just added it here! 🤓