You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
OIC UI: knowledge explorer and proposal review #230
People must be able to see why a claim exists and correct it. A clear claims-and-evidence view comes before any graph visualization. Uses only the API (#228).
Behavior to implement
Browse and search claims and entities. Filter by scope, type, status, and time.
Claim page: statement, scope, status, valid and recorded time, supporting and contradicting evidence with source links, related claims and entities, version history, why it is stale or disputed, and a link to the investigation that produced or changed it.
Proposal review: approve, reject with a reason, edit or qualify, request more investigation, mark disputed, confirm or correct validity dates. Every action is audited.
Acceptance criteria
From a claim, a user can reach every piece of evidence and the originating investigation in two clicks.
Approving or rejecting a proposal shows up in claim history with who and when.
Activity