Documentation · not source
What this repository is. Documentation for EvAGI — what it does, how it is organised, and what state it is in.
What it is not. This is not the source repository. No implementation code, configuration, prompts or infrastructure lives here, and none will.
Zero measured forgetting in both published runs — and the reason matters. Each task owns disjoint parameters, so there is no shared weight for one task to overwrite. Isolation removes interference by construction. That is a real result with a narrow claim, not a solution to catastrophic forgetting.
- Routes each input to the expert set that should handle it
- Keeps experts and their parameter pools disjoint, so no weights are shared
- Predicts how much capacity a task needs rather than activating everything
- Learns facts live and re-checks them in a fresh session
- Reports measured accuracy, forgetting and capacity alongside every run
Input
↓
Router ← decides from a live support set
↓
┌─────────┼─────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
Expert A Expert B Expert C ← disjoint, no shared parameters
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Pool A Pool B Pool C ← each owns its own parameters
│ │ │
└─────────┼─────────┘
↓
Merge
↓
Result
| Maturity | Experimental — see STATUS.md |
| Version | research prototype |
| Public page | https://evsphere.vercel.app/research/evagi |
- Catastrophic forgetting is NOT solved by this work
- Zero measured forgetting arises because each task gets disjoint parameters — interference is removed by construction, not by improving retention
- Both published runs are single runs — no seeds, repeats or error bars
- Neither task set is a standard continual-learning benchmark
- Nothing is released publicly, so results cannot be independently reproduced
- The efficiency comparison is against full fine-tuning, the weakest available baseline
Full detail, including what is not claimed, is in docs/STATUS.md.
| Document | Covers |
|---|---|
| ARCHITECTURE.md | Conceptual structure and subsystem responsibilities |
| docs/HOW-IT-WORKS.md | Stage by stage, and where the boundaries are |
| docs/STATUS.md | Maturity, requirements and what is not claimed |
| docs/FAQ.md | Common questions and honest answers |
| NOTICE.md | What is deliberately absent, and licensing |
🌐 Website · GitHub · npm · LinkedIn · X
Machine-readable: llms.txt · llms-full.txt
Internal implementation detail is not published here. No credential, endpoint, key, dataset or client material is included — see NOTICE.md.
If you find any of those here, it is an error. Report it privately through the enquiry page rather than opening a public issue.