Update maintenance goals by 4383 · Pull Request #850 · eventlet/eventlet

4383 · 2023-12-19T15:04:25Z

See the commit message for more details.

codecov · 2023-12-19T15:06:36Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6441021) 53% compared to head (a674d89) 61%.
Report is 23 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #850     +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage      53%     61%     +7%     
========================================
  Files          88      89      +1     
  Lines        9869   12075   +2206     
  Branches     1848    2825    +977     
========================================
+ Hits         5325    7449   +2124     
- Misses       4156    4205     +49     
- Partials      388     421     +33

Flag	Coverage Δ
ipv6	`27% <ø> (+4%)`	⬆️
py310asyncio	`51% <ø> (?)`
py310epolls	`59% <ø> (+7%)`	⬆️
py310poll	`52% <ø> (ø)`
py310selects	`59% <ø> (+7%)`	⬆️
py311epolls	`59% <ø> (+7%)`	⬆️
py312asyncio	`49% <ø> (?)`
py312epolls	`57% <ø> (+6%)`	⬆️
py37epolls	`57% <ø> (+7%)`	⬆️
py38epolls	`59% <ø> (+7%)`	⬆️
py38openssl	`50% <ø> (+<1%)`	⬆️
py38poll	`?`
py38selects	`52% <ø> (+<1%)`	⬆️
py39dnspython1	`50% <ø> (-1%)`	⬇️
py39epolls	`?`
py39poll	`52% <ø> (-1%)`	⬇️
py39selects	`59% <ø> (+7%)`	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

4383 · 2023-12-19T15:11:45Z

README.rst

 The built html files can be found in doc/_build/html afterward.

-
-Twisted


This section was added in 2014 and the twisted support have been removed since eventlet 0.14.0. We are now close to 2024, I think we can safely remove this section. The message have been passed.

4383 · 2023-12-19T15:12:37Z

README.rst


 Python 3.7-3.12 are currently supported.

-Flair


badges are more useful at the beginning of README files

4383 · 2023-12-19T15:15:01Z

README.rst

+.. image:: https://codecov.io/gh/eventlet/eventlet/branch/master/graph/badge.svg
+    :target: https://codecov.io/gh/eventlet/eventlet
+
+.. warning::


Looks like rst notes and warnings [1] are not recognized by github's rendering engine. Do you think we should simply bold the following sentence?

[1] https://sublime-and-sphinx-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/notes_warnings.html

How about a) make "Warning" a chapter header? b) move this even in front of the "Eventlet" chapter? After all, this likely is the most important information on this page for anyone reading this doc for the first time.

Good idea. I'll update the patch to match your proposal. Will do that after my PTO.

itamarst · 2023-12-19T15:16:39Z

README.rst


-.. image:: https://img.shields.io/github/actions/workflow/status/eventlet/eventlet/test.yaml?branch=master
-    :target: https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/actions?query=workflow%3Atest+branch%3Amaster
+Eventlet was created almost 18 years ago, at a time where async features


This is important enough that I would either move it to the top, or add a sentence to the top saying "New usages of eventlet are now heavily discouraged, see below for details."

I agree, I'll rework that part.

itamarst · 2023-12-19T15:16:59Z

I assume you only want to merge this in January, per comments on the issue?

4383 · 2023-12-19T15:44:19Z

I assume you only want to merge this in January, per comments on the issue?

Absolutely, however, I prefer to publicly designing this pull request starting now, to allow people to see our intentions well before merging this patch.

I'll drop the WIP flag early in January. Is it ok for you?

itamarst · 2024-01-11T15:29:42Z

If you do another pass we can include this in next release?

4383 · 2024-01-11T16:05:38Z

Yes, that's what I was thinking.

I was thinking that the next release would be related to the hub and to our new maintenance goals.

May, with the next release, we can provide a major version. A version 1.0. That would highlight the stable character related to our new maintenance goal (only bugfixes, and security stuffs allowed). Also that would provide a strong signal at destination to the community to socialize the new asyncio hub.

@itamarst : Any opinion?

4383 · 2024-01-12T10:20:28Z

I'm currently updating this pull request. I take account of your remarks and I'm now rewriting sentences to speak about the new asyncio hub. I'll push my changes today.

4383 · 2024-01-12T11:03:51Z

I'm currently updating this pull request. I take account of your remarks and I'm now rewriting sentences to speak about the new asyncio hub. I'll push my changes today.

done

itamarst

A few minor suggestions, then merge — thank you!

itamarst · 2024-01-12T13:54:17Z

README.rst

+and if you do not yet use eventlet, then, we encourage you to use `asyncio`_,
+which is the official async library of the CPython stdlib.
+
+If you already use eventlet, a new asyncio hub has been recently added to


I would omit this paragraph for now, since:

This hub is still very minimally tested. I would like e.g. a few OpenStack projects to run their test suites, at an absolute minimum.

Merely using the hub doesn't help with migration, there's a bunch of additional infrastructure (in progress) and documentation needed.

Some users can't realistically migrate this way. In particular there's projects like Celery that specifically rely on having an API that looks blocking, so "rewrite with asyncio" doesn't meet that use case. Might be a bad desire, but it's still a different case than OpenStack. So I suspect we'll want different advice for different users ("you can use gevent, although we believe it will have similar issues" for celery-like users I guess).

Good points, let me drop that sentence.

What do you think if we reword this sentence to simply indicate that we are thinking about a migration plan?
Maybe would should less formal about the existence of this feature, but we could simply indicate that we are looking for a solution to allow user migrating from eventlet to asyncio without much details for now, thoughts?

itamarst · 2024-01-12T13:55:03Z

doc/index.rst

+and if you do not yet use eventlet, then, we encourage you to use `asyncio`_,
+which is the official async library of the CPython stdlib.
+
+If you already use eventlet, a new asyncio hub has been recently added to


Same thing, I would delete this paragraph for now.

itamarst · 2024-01-12T13:55:39Z

README.rst

@@ -1,3 +1,55 @@
+Warning


GitHub actually has syntax for this: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/16925

That's not a markdown file, it is a restructredText file, and I don't think this syntaxe is supported by Pypi ...

I'd suggest keeping a compatible solution. The current proposed one.

- Discourage new eventlet usages - Encourage usages of asyncio for network programming - Speak about our intentions to allow transitions from eventlet to asyncio - Highlight our plan to retire eventlet - Maintenance only for bugfixes and security purposes - New features are not accepted

4383 · 2024-01-12T15:57:47Z

@itamarst: Let me know if the latest version of this patch is ok for you, especially the reword of the asyncio hub sentence.

osfrickler

I'm fine with this as is and I think it is more important to get this merged than to discuss details of formatting and wording, so please read my comments more as ideas for a possible followup.

osfrickler · 2024-01-15T06:14:19Z

README.rst

+
+**Eventlet is now switching to legacy mode**. **Only maintenance for stability
+and bug fixing** will be provided. **No new features will be accepted**, except
+those related to the asyncio migration. **Usage in new projects are


Either "Usage in new projects is ..." or "Usages in new projects are ..."

osfrickler · 2024-01-15T06:16:24Z

README.rst

+This gap is now too high and can lead you to unexpected side effects and bugs
+in your applications.
+
+**Eventlet is now switching to legacy mode**. **Only maintenance for stability


"Eventlet has now been switched to legacy mode"?

osfrickler · 2024-01-15T06:20:12Z

README.rst


 Quick Example
-===============
+=============


IMO this example only serves to attract new uses, so I'd suggest to drop it completely, too.

Gunicorn should discourage new usages accordingly, see eventlet/eventlet#850

4383 commented Dec 19, 2023

View reviewed changes

README.rst

Python 3.7-3.12 are currently supported.

Flair

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Member Author

4383 Dec 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

badges are more useful at the beginning of README files

4383 commented Dec 19, 2023

View reviewed changes

itamarst reviewed Dec 19, 2023

View reviewed changes

4383 force-pushed the maintenance-goals branch from 8e3704b to 95108e2 Compare December 19, 2023 15:23

4383 force-pushed the maintenance-goals branch from 95108e2 to 43c7130 Compare December 19, 2023 15:55

4383 mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2024

Asyncio integration for eventlet #868

Open

10 tasks

4383 force-pushed the maintenance-goals branch from 43c7130 to 74c9aa9 Compare January 12, 2024 10:58

4383 changed the title ~~[WIP] Update maintenance goals~~ Update maintenance goals Jan 12, 2024

4383 force-pushed the maintenance-goals branch from 74c9aa9 to 290fda6 Compare January 12, 2024 11:03

4383 requested review from itamarst and osfrickler January 12, 2024 12:50

itamarst approved these changes Jan 12, 2024

View reviewed changes

4383 force-pushed the maintenance-goals branch from 290fda6 to a674d89 Compare January 12, 2024 15:46

osfrickler approved these changes Jan 15, 2024

View reviewed changes

4383 merged commit 7662654 into eventlet:master Jan 15, 2024

4383 deleted the maintenance-goals branch January 15, 2024 08:58

4383 mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2024

[release] eventlet 0.35.0 #897

Closed

pajod added a commit to pajod/gunicorn that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025

eventlet upstream has changed maintenance goals

3ed0dbb

Gunicorn should discourage new usages accordingly, see eventlet/eventlet#850

pajod added a commit to pajod/gunicorn that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2026

eventlet upstream has changed maintenance goals

cd57734

Gunicorn should discourage new usages accordingly, see eventlet/eventlet#850

		The built html files can be found in doc/_build/html afterward.


		Twisted

Conversation

4383 commented Dec 19, 2023

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

itamarst commented Dec 19, 2023

Uh oh!

4383 commented Dec 19, 2023

Uh oh!

itamarst commented Jan 11, 2024

Uh oh!

4383 commented Jan 11, 2024

Uh oh!

4383 commented Jan 12, 2024

Uh oh!

4383 commented Jan 12, 2024

Uh oh!

itamarst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

4383 commented Jan 12, 2024

Uh oh!

osfrickler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading