-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 464
Closed
Labels
ACDType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusExecutionLayer: Issues that affect the execution layerLayer: Issues that affect the execution layer
Description
All Core Devs Meeting 16 Agenda
Meeting Date/Time: Friday 5/19/17 at 14:00 UTC
Meeting Duration 1.5 hours
YouTube Live Stream Link
Agenda
- ERC-20 Token Standard Finalization [Fabian, Nick, or Hudson]
- Metropolis updates/EIPs.
- a. Details and implementations of EIPs.
- "Agreeing on gas costs for MODEXP, ECADD, ECMUL, ECPAIRING. For MODEXP specifically, are we going to modify it to somehow incorporate bit length or not?" [Vitalik]
- Concerns around the REVERT opcode introducing an economic change that may break things and revisiting cost/benefit analysis of the opcode. [Vitalik]
- "Regarding EIP 96: should the gas price of
BLOCKHASHalready change from the beginning of the Metropolis, or from the block where the behavior ofBLOCKHASHchanges?" More info: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/210/files#r117211219 [Yoichi] - "Regarding EIP96 (BLOCKHASH contract): should the blockhash-maintainance call at the beginning of each block increment the nonce of
SYSTEM_ACCOUNT? https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/210/files#r117260179" [Yoichi] - "Regarding EIP98 (med state removal): this should start at (inclusive) METROPOLIS_FORK_BLKNUM instead of one block after that (as written in the EIP). Pointed out by @gumb0 Remove medstate from receipts EIPs#98 (comment)" [Yoichi]
- "Regarding EIP 211 (RETURNDATACOPY): the behavior of reading out-of-bounds from the returndata buffer is under discussion." [Yoichi]
- b. Updates to testing.
- c. Any "subtleties" we need to work out.
- d. Review time estimate for testing/release.
- [Time permitting] "If we have time (no high priority), I would like to get some feedback about adding functionality that allows dapps to be notified whenever a certain address was touched by a transaction (including internal calls). This information does not necessarily have to be part of the block, but could be an isolated index database." [Christian R.]
Please provide comments to add or correct agenda topics.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
ACDType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusExecutionLayer: Issues that affect the execution layerLayer: Issues that affect the execution layer