Skip to content

move eip-2464 from "stagnant" to "review"#4367

Closed
poojaranjan wants to merge 1 commit intoethereum:masterfrom
poojaranjan:BR32
Closed

move eip-2464 from "stagnant" to "review"#4367
poojaranjan wants to merge 1 commit intoethereum:masterfrom
poojaranjan:BR32

Conversation

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@eth-bot eth-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) October 14, 2021 15:42
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Oct 14, 2021

Hi! I'm a bot, and I wanted to automerge your PR, but couldn't because of the following issue(s):


eip-2464.md

Copy link
Contributor

@abcoathup abcoathup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like Peter is two authors rather than providing email and GitHub contact details

@MicahZoltu
Copy link

This looks like Peter is two authors rather than providing email and GitHub contact details

This is the mechanism we use when one author would like both their GitHub handle and email address listed. Doing it any other way breaks our automation/tooling.

Copy link

@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test Cases section should be removed if there are no test cases. It is an optional section.

Security Considerations section is missing but is required for all EIPs.

Recommend moving all but the last paragraph of the Abstract into the Motivation. The abstract should just be a succinct human readable summary of the specification and should not go into the why at all.

Implementation isn't an EIP section so should be removed (also, external links should be removed). Reference Implementation is a section, but should include an inline implementation (usually pseudocode) or a link to something in ../assets/eip-2464. In this case, I recommend just removing the section entirely.

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
---
eip: 2464
title: "eth/65: transaction announcements and retrievals"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
title: "eth/65: transaction announcements and retrievals"
title: "eth/65: transaction announcements and retrievals"
description: Introduces `NewPooledTransactionHashes`, `GetPooledTransactions`, and `PooledTransactions`.

description is a new required field (replaces Simple Summary).

@timbeiko
Copy link
Contributor

@poojaranjan @MicahZoltu I've tried to address all concerns in #4395 so we can have a single PR to merge.

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #4395

@poojaranjan poojaranjan closed this Nov 2, 2021
auto-merge was automatically disabled November 2, 2021 16:57

Pull request was closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants