Conversation
Meta EIP for tracking Eligibility for Inclusion as defined in the EIP-centric Forking Model.
| title: EIPS eligible for Inclusion | ||
| author: James Hancock (MadeofTin) | ||
| discussions-to: <URL> | ||
| status: Draft |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Didn't we say this is in Active status (e.g. a registry)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should it go directly to Active? Or start as Draft and then be moved to Active?
|
Could we merge this? Have been linking it to multiple people as the "official" resource of EIPs that are being considered. cc: @axic @MadeofTin |
Given that this will be a registry EIP and the informational part will be moved out eventually. It made sense to me for the appropriate discussion about what EIPs are included should happen on the /ethereum/eip gitter channel.
We have agreed in December with @MadeofTin that this EIP should not propose a change in process (as the process just should be part of EIP-1 or EIP-233, because having multiple draft process EIPs is extremely confusing) and be only a listing. Was this change done? |
|
Not yet. Adding it to EIP-1 is part of the plan of the EIPIP work, but Tim mentioned that not having a place to point people to see the registry has made working with it difficult. In my view the process changed when the ACD agreed to move to the EIP-Centric model. The description in 2378 was meant to be informational to those who don't know anything about the model. When I made it just as a registry it was unclear. The description in 2378 isn't sufficient to describe the actual process change which should take place in EIP-1. Pulling the description out of here, before having the process change described in EIP in my view would add more confusion. As EIP-1 progresses we can remove it from here. I am still working on what is the best way to add it to EIP-1. |
|
IMO: we should keep2378 as DRAFT until EIP-1 is updated and then be moved to ACTIVE. |
* EIPS eligible for Inclusion Meta EIP for tracking Eligibility for Inclusion as defined in the EIP-centric Forking Model. * Spelling and formatting updates * Formating Github Markdown * Added number and responded to Feedback * Update and rename EIP-2378.md to eip-2378.md * EFI: Updated Discussion-to URL to the /EIP Given that this will be a registry EIP and the informational part will be moved out eventually. It made sense to me for the appropriate discussion about what EIPs are included should happen on the /ethereum/eip gitter channel.
* EIPS eligible for Inclusion Meta EIP for tracking Eligibility for Inclusion as defined in the EIP-centric Forking Model. * Spelling and formatting updates * Formating Github Markdown * Added number and responded to Feedback * Update and rename EIP-2378.md to eip-2378.md * EFI: Updated Discussion-to URL to the /EIP Given that this will be a registry EIP and the informational part will be moved out eventually. It made sense to me for the appropriate discussion about what EIPs are included should happen on the /ethereum/eip gitter channel.
* EIPS eligible for Inclusion Meta EIP for tracking Eligibility for Inclusion as defined in the EIP-centric Forking Model. * Spelling and formatting updates * Formating Github Markdown * Added number and responded to Feedback * Update and rename EIP-2378.md to eip-2378.md * EFI: Updated Discussion-to URL to the /EIP Given that this will be a registry EIP and the informational part will be moved out eventually. It made sense to me for the appropriate discussion about what EIPs are included should happen on the /ethereum/eip gitter channel.
4 participants
Meta EIP for tracking Eligibility for Inclusion as defined in the EIP-centric Forking Model.