Merged
Conversation
2 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
Process: take current code, paste into Typora, copy from Typora and paste back here. |
Arachnid
reviewed
May 23, 2018
|
|
||
| - An **Informational EIP** describes an Ethereum design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the Ethereum community, but does not propose a new feature. Informational EIPs do not necessarily represent Ethereum community consensus or a recommendation, so users and implementers are free to ignore Informational EIPs or follow their advice. | ||
| - A **Meta EIP** describes a process surrounding Ethereum or proposes a change to (or an event in) a process. Process EIPs are like Standards Track EIPs but apply to areas other than the Ethereum protocol itself. They may propose an implementation, but not to Ethereum's codebase; they often require community consensus; unlike Informational EIPs, they are more than recommendations, and users are typically not free to ignore them. Examples include procedures, guidelines, changes to the decision-making process, and changes to the tools or environment used in Ethereum development. Any meta-EIP is also considered a Process EIP. | ||
| - A **Standard Track EIP** describes any change that affects most or all Ethereum implementations, such as a change to the the network protocol, a change in block or transaction validity rules, proposed application standards/conventions, or any change or addition that affects the interoperability of applications using Ethereum. Furthermore Standard EIPs can be broken down into the following categories. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are only some of these bullet points indented?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Core, Networking, Interface, ERC are sub categories of Standards Track EIPs. The indentation is subordinated.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you are seeing something else, please you are welcome to make a commit here in this PR.
EIPS/eip-1.md
Outdated
| The possible paths of the status of EIPs are as follows: | ||
|
|
||
|  | ||
| ![EIP Process]() |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are you deleting the process chart?
Contributor
Author
|
Hello team, are there any other remaining comments? I believe all the above reviews are addressed, can this please be merged. |
Arachnid
approved these changes
May 24, 2018
Arachnid
pushed a commit
to Arachnid/EIPs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2018
* Fix formatting * Correct EIP process
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When opening a pull request to submit a new EIP, please use the suggested template: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-X.md
We have a GitHub bot that automatically merges some PRs. It will merge yours immediately if certain criteria are met: