feat: no-useless-backreference support v flag#17408
Merged
mdjermanovic merged 2 commits intoeslint:mainfrom Jul 25, 2023
Merged
feat: no-useless-backreference support v flag#17408mdjermanovic merged 2 commits intoeslint:mainfrom
no-useless-backreference support v flag#17408mdjermanovic merged 2 commits intoeslint:mainfrom
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-eslint canceled.
|
mdjermanovic
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2023
Member
mdjermanovic
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks!
Merging this should wait for #17404 to be merged first.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)
[X] Changes an existing rule (template)
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Refs #17223
This PR modifies the
no-useless-backreferencerule and adds support for regexpvflag.Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?