Skip to content

Bump actions/checkout from 2 to 3#2

Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intounstablefrom
dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3
Closed

Bump actions/checkout from 2 to 3#2
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intounstablefrom
dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 7, 2022

Bumps actions/checkout from 2 to 3.

Release notes

Sourced from actions/checkout's releases.

v3.0.0

  • Update default runtime to node16

v2.4.0

  • Convert SSH URLs like org-<ORG_ID>@github.com: to https://github.com/ - pr

v2.3.5

Update dependencies

v2.3.4

v2.3.3

v2.3.2

Add Third Party License Information to Dist Files

v2.3.1

Fix default branch resolution for .wiki and when using SSH

v2.3.0

Fallback to the default branch

v2.2.0

Fetch all history for all tags and branches when fetch-depth=0

v2.1.1

Changes to support GHES (here and here)

v2.1.0

Changelog

Sourced from actions/checkout's changelog.

Changelog

v2.3.1

v2.3.0

v2.2.0

v2.1.1

  • Changes to support GHES (here and here)

v2.1.0

v2.0.0

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
> **Note** > Automatic rebases have been disabled on this pull request as it has been open for over 30 days.

@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Mar 7, 2022
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 23, 2022

OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting @dependabot ignore this major version or @dependabot ignore this minor version. You can also ignore all major, minor, or patch releases for a dependency by adding an ignore condition with the desired update_types to your config file.

If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it.

@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3 branch March 23, 2022 01:37
enjoy-binbin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2023
…is missed cases to redis-server. (redis#12322)

Observed that the sanitizer reported memory leak as clean up is not done
before the process termination in negative/following cases:

**- when we passed '--invalid' as option to redis-server.**

```
 -vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --invalid

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'invalid'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments

=================================================================
==865778==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f0985f65867 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
    #1 0x558ec86686ec in ztrymalloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:117
    #2 0x558ec86686ec in ztrymalloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:135
    #3 0x558ec86686ec in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:276
    #4 0x558ec86686ec in zrealloc /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:327
    #5 0x558ec865dd7e in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1172
    #6 0x558ec87a1be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #7 0x558ec87a13b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #8 0x558ec85e6f15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #9 0x7f09856e5d8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 8 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).

```

**- when we pass '--port' as option and missed to add port number to redis-server.**

```
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --port

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'port'
wrong number of arguments

=================================================================
==865846==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fdcdbb1f867 in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
    #1 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztrymalloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:117
    #2 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztrymalloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:135
    #3 0x557e8b04f6ec in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:276
    #4 0x557e8b04f6ec in zrealloc /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:327
    #5 0x557e8b044d7e in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1172
    #6 0x557e8b188be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #7 0x557e8b1883b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #8 0x557e8afcdf15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #9 0x7fdcdb29fd8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

Indirect leak of 10 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fdcdbb1fc18 in __interceptor_realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:164
    #1 0x557e8b04f9aa in ztryrealloc_usable_internal /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:287
    #2 0x557e8b04f9aa in ztryrealloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:317
    #3 0x557e8b04f9aa in zrealloc_usable /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/zmalloc.c:342
    #4 0x557e8b033f90 in _sdsMakeRoomFor /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:271
    #5 0x557e8b033f90 in sdsMakeRoomFor /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:295
    #6 0x557e8b033f90 in sdscatlen /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:486
    #7 0x557e8b044e1f in sdssplitargs /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/sds.c:1165
    #8 0x557e8b188be7 in loadServerConfigFromString /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:472
    #9 0x557e8b1883b3 in loadServerConfig /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/config.c:718
    #10 0x557e8afcdf15 in main /home/ubuntu/mem-leak-issue/redis/src/server.c:7258
    #11 0x7fdcdb29fd8f in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 18 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).

```

As part analysis found that the sdsfreesplitres is not called when this condition checks are being hit.

Output after the fix:


```
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --invalid

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'invalid'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$

===========================================
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --jdhg

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'jdhg'
Bad directive or wrong number of arguments

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
vm:~/mem-leak-issue/redis$ ./src/redis-server --port

*** FATAL CONFIG FILE ERROR (Redis 255.255.255) ***
Reading the configuration file, at line 2
>>> 'port'
wrong number of arguments
```

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <[email protected]>
@enjoy-binbin enjoy-binbin restored the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3 branch July 31, 2023 16:06
@enjoy-binbin enjoy-binbin reopened this Jul 31, 2023
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 31, 2023

Looks like actions/checkout is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Jul 31, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3 branch July 31, 2023 16:06
@enjoy-binbin enjoy-binbin restored the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3 branch July 31, 2023 16:09
@enjoy-binbin enjoy-binbin reopened this Jul 31, 2023
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 31, 2023

Looks like actions/checkout is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Jul 31, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3 branch July 31, 2023 16:10
@enjoy-binbin enjoy-binbin restored the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3 branch July 31, 2023 16:12
@enjoy-binbin enjoy-binbin reopened this Jul 31, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3 branch from 7e4b65c to b0421ad Compare July 31, 2023 16:13
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-3 branch September 4, 2023 11:41
enjoy-binbin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2024
## Issues and solutions from redis#12817
1. Touch ProcessingEventsWhileBlocked and calling moduleCount() without
GIL in afterSleep()
    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.0.0
       PR: redis#9963

   - Harm Level: Very High
If the module thread calls `RM_Yield()` before the main thread enters
afterSleep(),
and modifies `ProcessingEventsWhileBlocked`(+1), it will cause the main
thread to not wait for GIL,
which can lead to all kinds of unforeseen problems, including memory
data corruption.

   - Initial / Abandoned Solution:
      * Added `__thread` specifier for ProcessingEventsWhileBlocked.
`ProcessingEventsWhileBlocked` is used to protect against nested event
processing, but event processing
in the main thread and module threads should be completely independent
and unaffected, so it is safer
         to use TLS.
* Adding a cached module count to keep track of the current number of
modules, to avoid having to use `dictSize()`.
    
    - Related Warnings:
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=1136)
  Write of size 4 at 0x0001045990c0 by thread T4 (mutexes: write M0):
    #0 processEventsWhileBlocked networking.c:4135 (redis-server:arm64+0x10006d124)
    #1 RM_Yield module.c:2410 (redis-server:arm64+0x10018b66c)
    #2 bg_call_worker <null>:83232836 (blockedclient.so:arm64+0x16a8)

  Previous read of size 4 at 0x0001045990c0 by main thread:
    #0 afterSleep server.c:1861 (redis-server:arm64+0x100024f98)
    #1 aeProcessEvents ae.c:408 (redis-server:arm64+0x10000fd64)
    #2 aeMain ae.c:496 (redis-server:arm64+0x100010f0c)
    #3 main server.c:7220 (redis-server:arm64+0x10003f38c)
```

2. aeApiPoll() is not thread-safe
When using RM_Yield to handle events in a module thread, if the main
thread has not yet
entered `afterSleep()`, both the module thread and the main thread may
touch `server.el` at the same time.

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.0.0
       PR: redis#9963

   - Old / Abandoned Solution:
Adding a new mutex to protect timing between after beforeSleep() and
before afterSleep().
Defect: If the main thread enters the ae loop without any IO events, it
will wait until
the next timeout or until there is any event again, and the module
thread will
always hang until the main thread leaves the event loop.

    - Related Warnings:
```
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race ae_kqueue.c:55 in addEventMask
==================
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=14682)
  Write of size 4 at 0x000100b54000 by thread T9 (mutexes: write M0):
    #0 aeApiPoll ae_kqueue.c:175 (redis-server:arm64+0x100010588)
    #1 aeProcessEvents ae.c:399 (redis-server:arm64+0x10000fb84)
    #2 processEventsWhileBlocked networking.c:4138 (redis-server:arm64+0x10006d3c4)
    #3 RM_Yield module.c:2410 (redis-server:arm64+0x10018b66c)
    #4 bg_call_worker <null>:16042052 (blockedclient.so:arm64+0x169c)

  Previous write of size 4 at 0x000100b54000 by main thread:
    #0 aeApiPoll ae_kqueue.c:175 (redis-server:arm64+0x100010588)
    #1 aeProcessEvents ae.c:399 (redis-server:arm64+0x10000fb84)
    #2 aeMain ae.c:496 (redis-server:arm64+0x100010da8)
    #3 main server.c:7238 (redis-server:arm64+0x10003f51c)
```

## The final fix as the comments:
redis#12817 (comment)
Optimized solution based on the above comment:

First, we add `module_gil_acquring` to indicate whether the main thread
is currently in the acquiring GIL state.

When the module thread starts to yield, there are two possibilities(we
assume the caller keeps the GIL):
1. The main thread is in the mid of beforeSleep() and afterSleep(), that
is, `module_gil_acquring` is not 1 now.
At this point, the module thread will wake up the main thread through
the pipe and leave the yield,
waiting for the next yield when the main thread may already in the
acquiring GIL state.
    
2. The main thread is in the acquiring GIL state.
The module thread release the GIL, yielding CPU to give the main thread
an opportunity to start
event processing, and then acquire the GIL again until the main thread
releases it.
This is what
redis#12817 (comment)
mentioned direction.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <[email protected]>
enjoy-binbin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
fix some issues that come from sanitizer thread report.

1. when the main thread is updating daylight_active, other threads (bio,
module thread) may be writing logs at the same time.
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=661064)
  Read of size 4 at 0x55c9a4d11c70 by thread T2:
    #0 serverLogRaw /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:116 (redis-server+0x8d797) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #1 _serverLog.constprop.2 /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:146 (redis-server+0x2a3b14) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #2 bioProcessBackgroundJobs /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/bio.c:329 (redis-server+0x1c24ca) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)

  Previous write of size 4 at 0x55c9a4d11c70 by main thread (mutexes: write M0, write M1, write M2, write M3):
    #0 updateCachedTimeWithUs /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:1102 (redis-server+0x925e7) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #1 updateCachedTimeWithUs /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:1087 (redis-server+0x925e7)
    #2 updateCachedTime /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:1118 (redis-server+0x925e7)
    #3 afterSleep /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:1811 (redis-server+0x925e7)
    #4 aeProcessEvents /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:389 (redis-server+0x85ae0) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #5 aeProcessEvents /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:342 (redis-server+0x85ae0)
    #6 aeMain /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:477 (redis-server+0x85ae0)
    #7 main /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:7211 (redis-server+0x7168c) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
```

2. thread leaks in module tests
```
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: thread leak (pid=668683)
  Thread T13 (tid=670041, finished) created by main thread at:
    #0 pthread_create ../../../../src/libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1036 (libtsan.so.2+0x3d179) (BuildId: 28a9f70061dbb2dfa2cef661d3b23aff4ea13536)
    #1 HelloBlockNoTracking_RedisCommand /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/tests/modules/blockonbackground.c:200 (blockonbackground.so+0x97fd) (BuildId: 9cd187906c57e88cdf896d121d1d96448b37a136)
    #2 HelloBlockNoTracking_RedisCommand /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/tests/modules/blockonbackground.c:169 (blockonbackground.so+0x97fd)
    #3 call /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:3546 (redis-server+0x9b7fb) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #4 processCommand /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:4176 (redis-server+0xa091c) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #5 processCommandAndResetClient /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/networking.c:2468 (redis-server+0xd2b8e) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #6 processInputBuffer /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/networking.c:2576 (redis-server+0xd2b8e)
    #7 readQueryFromClient /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/networking.c:2722 (redis-server+0xd358f) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #8 callHandler /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/connhelpers.h:58 (redis-server+0x288a7b) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #9 connSocketEventHandler /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/socket.c:277 (redis-server+0x288a7b)
    #10 aeProcessEvents /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:417 (redis-server+0x85b45) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
    #11 aeProcessEvents /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:342 (redis-server+0x85b45)
    #12 aeMain /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/ae.c:477 (redis-server+0x85b45)
    #13 main /home/sundb/data/redis_fork/src/server.c:7211 (redis-server+0x7168c) (BuildId: dca0b1945ba30010e36129bdb296e488dd2b32d0)
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant