Add consV, snocV for building NonEmptyVector#8
Merged
emilypi merged 1 commit intoemilypi:masterfrom Nov 18, 2020
Merged
Conversation
from an A and a Vector. Also, cons and snoc can be defined in terms of consV and snocV now
1aee298 to
670a586
Compare
emilypi
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
from an A and a Vector.
Also, cons and snoc can be defined in terms of consV and snocV now.
Closes #7
An alternative way to think about (and name) these would be as construction functions ie.
mkNonEmptyVector :: a -> Vector a -> NonEmptyVector a. I suppose once youconsVyou then have aNonEmptyVector, so you wouldn't chain multipleconsV.