Conversation
|
|
||
| ## member? | ||
|
|
||
| def do_member?(:stop, _, _) do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't these funcs be defined as private (defp) like the others?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, Please send a PR of they are still public!
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016, Oskar Boethius Lissheim <
[email protected]> wrote:
In lib/elixir/lib/enum.ex
#992 (comment):@@ -1549,6 +1571,20 @@ defmodule Enum do
{ :lists.reverse(list_acc), acc }
end
member?
- def do_member?(:stop, _, _) do
Shouldn't these funcs be defined as private (defp) like the others?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/pull/992/files#r54798954.
José Valimwww.plataformatec.com.br
http://www.plataformatec.com.br/Founder and Director of R&D
3 participants
No description provided.