feat: holder attestation #861
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ndr-brt
force-pushed
the
851-holder-attestation
branch
from
21f45f3 to
47f03cb
Compare
paullatzelsperger
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2025
ndr-brt
added
the
breaking-change
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR changes/adds
Implements an
holderattestation, that extracts claims from theHolderpropertiesBREAKING CHANGE new
propertiescolumn in theholderstableWhy it does that
provide a simpler attestation type than
databaseoneFurther notes
stopon credential request manager at shutdownimplementationWho will sponsor this feature?
Please @-mention the committer that will sponsor your feature.
Linked Issue(s)
Closes #851
Please be sure to take a look at the contributing guidelines and our etiquette for pull requests.